Giovanni Savino

Dr. Giovanni Savino

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Firenze, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 January 2020 in Traffic Injury Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GSGiovanni Savino
Giovanni Savino
RLRoberto Lot
Roberto Lot
Matteo MassaroMatteo Massaro
Matteo Massaro
MRMatteo Rizzi
Matteo Rizzi
ISIoannis Symeonidis
Ioannis Symeonidis
Julie BrownJulie Brown
Julie Brown
Objective: Active safety systems, of which antilock braking is a prominent example, are going to play an important role to improve powered two-wheeler (PTW) safety. This paper presents a systematic review of the scientific literature on active safety for PTWs. The aim was to list all systems under development, identify knowledge gaps and recognize promising research areas that require further efforts. Methods: A broad search using “safety” as the main keyword was performed on Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar, followed by manual screening to identify eligible papers that underwent a full-text review. Finally, the selected papers were grouped by general technology type and analyzed via structured form to identify the following: specific active safety system, study type, outcome type, population/sample where applicable, and overall findings. Results: Of the 8,000 papers identified with the initial search, 85 were selected for full-text review and 62 were finally included in the study, of which 34 were journal papers. The general technology types identified included antilock braking system, autonomous emergency braking, collision avoidance, intersection support, intelligent transportation systems, curve warning, human machine interface systems, stability control, traction control, and vision assistance. Approximately one third of the studies considered the design and early stage testing of safety systems (n. 22); almost one fourth (n.15) included evaluations of system effectiveness. Conclusions: Our systematic review shows that a multiplicity of active safety systems for PTWs were examined in the scientific literature, but the levels of development are diverse. A few systems are currently available in the series production, whereas other systems are still at the level of early-stage prototypes. Safety benefit assessments were conducted for single systems, however, organized comparisons between systems that may inform the prioritization of future research are lacking. Another area of future analysis is on the combined effects of different safety systems, that may be capitalized for better performance and to maximize the safety impact of new technologies.

1 October 2014 in Safety Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAvinash P. Penumaka
Avinash P. Penumaka
GSGiovanni Savino
Giovanni Savino
NBNiccolò Baldanzini
Niccolò Baldanzini
MPMarco Pierini
Marco Pierini

1 January 2013 in Traffic Injury Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GSGiovanni Savino
Giovanni Savino
FGFederico Giovannini
Federico Giovannini
NBNiccolò Baldanzini
Niccolò Baldanzini
MPMarco Pierini
Marco Pierini
MRMatteo Rizzi
Matteo Rizzi
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and quantitative potential benefits of a motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) system in fatal rear-end crashes. A further aim was to identify possible criticalities of this safety system in the field of powered 2-wheelers (PTWs; e.g., any additional risk introduced by the system itself). Methods: Seven relevant cases from the Swedish national in-depth fatal crash database were selected. All crashes involved car-following in which a non-anti-lock braking system (ABS)-equipped motorcycle was the bullet vehicle. Those crashes were reconstructed in a virtual environment with Prescan, simulating the road scenario, the vehicles involved, their precrash trajectories, ABS, and, alternatively, MAEB. The MAEB chosen as reference for the investigation was developed within the European Commission–funded Powered Two-Wheeler Integrated Safety (PISa) project and further detailed in later studies, with the addition of the ABS functionality. The boundary conditions of each simulation varied within a range compatible with the uncertainty of the in-depth data and also included a range of possible rider behaviors including the actual one. The benefits of the MAEB were evaluated by comparing the simulated impact speed in each configuration (no ABS/MAEB, ABS only, MAEB). Results: The MAEB proved to be beneficial in a large number of cases. When applicable, the benefits of the system were in line with the expected values. When not applicable, there was no clear evidence of an increased risk for the rider due to the system. Discussion and Limitations: MAEB represents an innovative safety device in the field of PTWs, and the feasibility of such a system was investigated with promising results. Nevertheless, this technology is not mature yet for PTW application. Research in the field of passenger cars does not directly apply to PTWs because the activation logic of a braking system is more challenging on PTWs. The deployment of an autonomous deceleration would affect the vehicle dynamics, thus requesting an additional control action of the rider to keep the vehicle stable. In addition, the potential effectiveness of the MAEB should be investigated on a wider set of crash scenarios in order also to avoid false triggering of the autonomous braking. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Traffic Injury Prevention to view the supplemental file.

18 February 2016 in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GSGiovanni Savino
Giovanni Savino
FGFederico Giovannini
Federico Giovannini
MFMichael Fitzharris
Michael Fitzharris
MPMarco Pierini
Marco Pierini
This paper presents a method to identify inevitable collision states (ICS) specifically for a motorcycle when interacting with an opponent passenger car in typical traffic scenarios. Previous ICS methods were applied to passenger cars or generic vehicles; however, the peculiarities of motorcycles urge the definition of specific methods for these vehicles. The findings extend the applicability of previous algorithms to include all motorcycle-to-car collisions, irrespective of collision configurations. ICS identification can be adopted as a triggering criterion for more invasive safety systems such as motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB), which require a last-resort approach in their initial phases of development. In this regard, this paper also presents an evaluation of an idealized MAEB through experiments simulating real-world crashes in a computer-based virtual environment.

1 May 2019 in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PHPedro Huertas-Leyva
Pedro Huertas-Leyva
MNMarilee Nugent
Marilee Nugent
GSGiovanni Savino
Giovanni Savino
MPMarco Pierini
Marco Pierini
NBNiccolò Baldanzini
Niccolò Baldanzini
SRSimon Rosalie
Simon Rosalie

8 April 2021 in Traffic Injury Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCosimo Lucci
Cosimo Lucci
SIMONE PIANTINISIMONE PIANTINI
SIMONE PIANTINI
GSGiovanni Savino
Giovanni Savino
MPMarco Pierini
Marco Pierini
Motorcycle helmets are the most common and effective protective device to reduce head injuries and mortality in crashes among powered two-wheeler riders. Even if they are globally recognized as eff...