Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves motor functions in patients suffering from advanced Parkinson’s disease but in some patients, it is also associated with a mild decline in cognitive functioning about one standard deviation from the preoperative state. We assessed the impact of the cortical lead entry point, the subcortical electrode path and the position of the active electrode contacts on neuropsychological changes after subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation compared to a control group of patients receiving best medical treatment. Sixty-eight patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease were randomly assigned to have subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation or best medical treatment for Parkinson’s disease. All patients had a blinded standardized neuropsychological exam (Mattis Dementia Rating scale, backward digit span, verbal fluency and Stroop task performance) at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Patients with subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation were defined as impaired according to a mild decline of one or more standard deviations compared to patients in the best medical treatment group. The cortical entry point of the electrodes, the electrode trajectories and the position of the active electrode contact were transferred into a normalized brain volume by an automated, non-linear registration algorithm to allow accurate statistical group analysis using pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging data. Data of 31 patients of the subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation group and 31 patients of the best medical treatment group were analysed. The subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation group showed impaired semantic fluency compared with the best medical treatment group 6 months after surgery (P = 0.02). Electrode trajectories intersecting with caudate nuclei increased the risk of a decline in global cognition and working memory performance. Statistically, for every 0.1 ml overlap with a caudate nucleus, the odds for a decline >1 standard deviation increased by a factor of 37.4 (odds ratio, confidence interval 2.1–371.8) for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and by a factor of 8.8 (odds ratio, confidence interval 1.0–70.9) for the backward digit span task. Patients with subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation who declined in semantic verbal fluency, Stroop task and the backward digit span task performance showed a position of the active electrode outside the volume built by the active electrodes of stable performers. Passage of the chronic stimulation lead through the head of the caudate increases the risk of global cognitive decline and working memory performance after subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Therefore the electrode path should be planned outside the caudate nuclei, whenever possible. This study also stresses the importance of precise positioning of the active stimulating contact within the subthalamic volume to avoid adverse effects on semantic verbal fluency and response inhibition.

Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal application of electric impulses to brain tissue. Electrodes are placed in the brain in order to modulate neural activity and to correct parameters of pathological oscillation in brain circuits such as their amplitude or frequency. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive alternative with the stimulator generating a magnetic field in a coil over the scalp that induces an electric field in the brain which, in turn, interacts with ongoing brain activity. Depending upon stimulation parameters, excitation and inhibition can be achieved. Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) applies electric fields to the scalp that spread along the skull in order to reach the brain, thus, limiting current strength to avoid skin sensations and cranial muscle pain. Therefore, tES can only modulate brain activity and is considered subthreshold, i.e., it does not directly elicit neuronal action potentials. In this review, we collect hints for neuroplastic changes such as modulation of behavior, the electric activity of the brain, or the evolution of clinical signs and symptoms in response to stimulation. Possible mechanisms are discussed, and future paradigms are suggested.

Objective: To investigate cerebellar gray matter volume in patients with essential tremor (ET). Methods: We used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) based on high-resolution T1-weighted MRI to compare gray and white matter density between 27 patients with ET and 27 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. Fourteen patients had only postural tremor, whereas 13 patients showed additional intention tremor. Results: VBM failed to demonstrate regional decreases in gray and white matter volume in patients with ET. There was, however, an expansion in gray matter depending on the type of tremor. Compared with age-matched control groups, patients with intention tremor showed a relative expansion of gray matter bilaterally in the region of the temporoparietal junction and the right middle occipital cortex. Conclusions: The lack of a consistent decrease in gray and white matter density argues against a progressive neurodegenerative process in essential tremor that leads to a substantial decrease in cerebellar gray matter volume. Patients with predominant intention tremor show a relative expansion of gray matter areas involved in higher order visuospatial processing, which might represent a long-term result of adaptive reorganization compensating the higher demands on the visuospatial control of skilled movements in case of trembling.