This study investigates the dynamic connectedness and spillovers between Islamic and conventional stock markets to reveal the time- and frequency-domain dynamics of the two asset classes under various market conditions. Using the spillover index of Baruník and Křehlík (2018), supplemented by the time-varying parameter vector autoregressions (TVP-VAR) connectedness model, we employ daily stock market indices for Islamic and conventional (G7) markets from November 23, 2015, to September 8, 2021. The findings explicate that the volatility spillovers across and within Islamic and/or G7 markets are time-varying and frequency-dependent but during market turbulences, the conventional stocks are prone to more volatilities than the Islamic stocks. Our findings additionally divulge contagious spillovers among Islamic and conventional stocks during Brexit and the studied COVID-19 period. Relative to mid-and long-term spillovers, we underscore the supremacy of short-term spillovers between Islamic and G7 markets. In turbulent trading periods, investors should utilise knowledge about market patterns and volatility to hedge their positions against lower stock returns, when spillover is more intense. Regulators should pay close attention to spillovers since they undermine cross-market connections. Intriguing findings and their implications are further discussed.

The study aims to shed new lights on the lead-lag relationships between the financial sector (RFSI) and economic growth (GDP) in the midst of global economic policy uncertainty (GEPU) shocks for BRICS economies. Hence, the bivariate, partial, and wavelet multiple correlations techniques are employed. From the bivariate analysis, we document positive bi-directional causality between the RFSI and economic growth over the sample period. The partial wavelet reveals that GEPU shocks distort the significance and directional comovements between the RFSI and GDP. Moreover, the outcome from the wavelet multiple cross correlations (WMCC) indicates that the RFSI is a first mover at most time scales for the BRICS economies. This is followed by GEPU which either leads or lags for most scales, especially for South Africa. The impact of GEPU on RFSI and GDP is worst for South Africa in about four cases in the medium-, and long-terms. This signifies that South Africa’s financial markets and economic growth are vulnerable to GEPU. However, the impetus for GEPU to drive the comovements between the financial sector and economic activity was less pronounced in the pre-COVID analysis conducted with the WMCC. The study supports both the supply-leading and demand-following hypotheses. Our findings also underscore the need for policymakers, investors and academics alike to incessantly observe the dynamics between finance and growth across time and periodicity while considering adverse shocks from global economic policy uncertainty in tandem.

The purpose of this study is to provide insight into the lead-lag relationships between the BRIC stock index and its constituents. In addition, we assess the comovements between the US volatility index (VIX) as a measure of investor uncertainty and fear and stock returns of BRIC economies. Therefore, the bi-wavelet and wavelet multiple correlations approaches are utilised. Findings from the bi-wavelet technique indicate that there are high interdependencies between the BRIC index and its constituents throughout the time-frequency domain. In addition, comovements between the BRIC index and its constituents was positive and significant. Notwithstanding, we find the BRIC index to be the first variable to respond to shocks when all the study variables were considered in the wavelet multiple cross-correlations. Similarly, the stock market of Brazil is the next to respond to shocks. On the other hand, the stock market of Russia lags in the long-term when the BRIC index was excluded from the wavelet multiple cross-correlations. We also find a uni-directional causality between the VIX and the BRIC stocks in the medium-, and long-terms. Specifically, the US VIX significantly drives the BRIC stocks and considered to be negative. Findings from the study imply that global investors can select any of the stock markets in BRIC to allocate their investments due to their strong interdependencies which may facilitate trade and investments. However, portfolio diversification, safe haven or hedge benefits within this region may be minimal due to their high integration with the BRIC index which demonstrates positive significant comovements. The findings present relevant inferences for portfolio diversification, policy decisions, and risk management schemes. It is recommended that investors hedge against volatilities in the BRIC stock markets using the US VIX.

We present a multi-scale and time-frequency analysis of the degree of integration and the lead-lag relationship between six cryptocurrencies (i.e., Bitcoin, Bitcoincash, Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, and Tether) and the cryptocurrency-implied volatility index (VCRIX). As a result, the wavelet techniques—bi-wavelet, partial wavelet, bivariate contemporary correlations (BCC), wavelet multiple correlations (WMC) and wavelet multiple cross-correlations (WMCC) are applied. Findings from the study provide that the interdependencies between the cryptocurrencies and VCRIX are high and mostly positive across investment horizons. Furthermore, the comovements between the cryptocurrencies designate long memory dynamics. The high comovements between cryptocurrencies are highly influenced by idiosyncratic shocks they possess rather than the VCRIX. In addition, the BCC and the WMC indicate that there is a high integration among all the cryptocurrencies. Categorically, the VCRIX could not lead or lag the interdependencies among the cryptocurrencies in the WMCC analysis. Findings from the study, therefore, divulge that investing in a single or few cryptocurrencies is highly risky due to the adverse impact of the VCRIX on individual cryptocurrencies. In general, investors should effectively hedge against volatilities in the cryptocurrency markets due to the significant predictive ability of VCRIX as an effective proxy.

This study provides an analysis of chaotic information transmission from the COVID-19 pandemic to global equity markets in a novel denoised frequency domain entropy framework. The current length of the pandemic data offers the opportunity to examine its role in the asymmetric behaviour patterns of investors according to time horizons and the diversification potentials available to them. We employ the total daily global confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 27 equity indices from December 31, 2019, to April 18, 2021. Our results corroborate the idea that diversification potentials are stronger in the short to medium term. The Global Index (higher risk) and Canada and New Zealand (lower risk) remain at both ends to pair some other equities to offer diversification prospects because of the transmission of information from COVID-19 to the selected equity markets. In addition, we provide the source of these diversification prospects as information flow rather than transmission of shocks, which is common in the literature. Furthermore, our results suggest detailed levels of risk (lower vis-à-vis higher) in the situation where they have been stripped of the noise in the market. The findings allow both investors and policymakers to make informed decisions based on the time horizons since the pandemic communicates different chaotic information with the lapse of time. This is imperative to avoid the negative consequences of the increasing infection rate on global stock markets.

This paper explores the symmetric and asymmetric dependency structure of decomposed return series of Gold and eight cryptocurrencies to establish the hedging and diversification potentials of these asset classes. Daily data spanning 30 April 2013 to 18 April 2019 are employed within the Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and Quantile-in-Quantile regression techniques. Our empirical results provide evidence that cryptocurrencies and Gold can both hedge and diversify for each other at different conditional distributions of their returns. We also find that cryptocurrencies are not purely speculative but can be driven by medium- and long-term fundamentals. In addition, both Gold and cryptocurrencies can be hedge and diversifiers for other traditional asset classes such as crude oil, fiat currencies, and other commodities.