Chinese cancer patients often use Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) herbal medicine during or after active cancer treatments. However, little is known about how TCM herbal medicine impacts cancer outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the association between TCM herbal therapy and survival outcomes in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer. We conducted an eight-center prospective cohort study in China among patients who had undergone radical resection for stage II and III colorectal cancer. All patients received comprehensive conventional treatments according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and follow-up visits were conducted over five years. We defined high exposure as a patient’s use of TCM individualized herbs for more than one year, ascertained via clinical interviews. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS), with overall survival (OS) as a secondary outcome. Between April 2007 and February 2009, we enrolled 312 patients into the cohort; 166 (53.2%) met the definition of high exposure to TCM herbs. Adjusting for covariates, high exposure to TCM was associated with both better DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 0.98) and OS (HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.68). In subgroup exploratory analysis, the effects demonstrated that the differences in outcomes were statistically significant in patients who had received chemotherapy. Longer duration of TCM herbal use is associated with improved survival outcomes in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients in China. More research is needed to evaluate the effects and underlying mechanisms of herbal medicine on colorectal cancer outcomes.

Quxie capsule(QX), a TCM compound, had shown benefit on survival outcomes for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients and could inhibit tumor growth through immune regulation. This study aimed to evaluate whether such effect is associated with gut microbiome modulation. We conducted a randomized double-blinded placebo controlled clinical trial in Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. All patients were randomly assigned into QX or placebo control group. Before and after 1-month interventions, we collected patients’ stool samples for microbiome analysis by 16s rRNA sequencing approaches, as well as blood samples to analyze T lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry methods. Microbiome analysis among groups was done through bioinformation analysis platform. The study had been proved by the ethics committee of Xiyuan Hospital (2016XLA122-1) had been registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2000029599). All patients consented before enrollment. We randomly assigned 40 patients and 34 were finally analyzed. Among them, 29% were female, with an average age of 63 years old, and 74% had liver or lung metastasis. Both CD4 T(TH) cell and CD8 T(TC) cell counts increased after QX treatment, while TH cells were significantly more in QX than in control group (737 vs 449, P = .024). Microbiome community analysis on Class level showed that the proportion of Actinobacteria declined in the control group, but significantly increased after QX treatments (0.83% vs 4.7%, P = .017). LEfSe analysis showed that after treatments, samples from QX group were highly related with Oscillibacter, Eubacterium, and Lachnospiraceae. RDA analysis showed that after QX interventions, stool samples and microbiome species had relevance with TC/TH cells counts but were not statistically significant. Heatmap analysis on Genus level revealed that after QX treatments, higher amounts of TH cells were significantly associated with less abundance of g_Bifidobacterium (coef. −0.76, P = .002), Collinsella (coef.−0.61, P = .02), Ruminiclostridium_9 (coef. −0.64, P = .01). QX capsule could enhance TH cells level among mCRC patients and increase the abundance of gut anticancer bacteria such as Actinobacteria as well as butyrate-producing bacteria such as Lachnospiraceae. These results indicated that QX capsule might have the property of dual effects of antitumor and immunity enhancement, both mediated by the microbiome.

Background: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is widely used among Chinese cancer patients. However, little is known about Chinese patients’ expectations and barriers toward using TCM for cancer. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey within a patient-support group, the Beijing Anti-Cancer Association. We measured the outcome, Chinese cancer survivors’ expectations and barriers toward TCM utilization, using a modified version of ABCAM (Attitudes and Beliefs towards Complementary and Alternative Medicine), the ABTCM (Attitudes and Beliefs towards Traditional Chinese Medicine). We used multivariate models to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic status and clinical factors on their expectations and barriers (including treatment concerns and logistical challenges domain) toward TCM. Results: Among 590 participants, most patients expected TCM to boost their immune system (96%), improve their physical health (96%), and reduce symptoms (94%). Many had logistical challenges (difficulty decocting herbs (58%) and finding a good TCM physician (55%)). A few were concerned that TCM might interfere with conventional treatments (7.6%), and that many TCM treatments are not based on scientific research (9.1%). In the multivariable regression model, age ≤60 years was independently associated with higher expectation score (P = .031). Age ≤60 years (coefficient 5.0, P = .003) and localized disease (coefficient 9.5, P = .001) were both associated with higher treatment concerns. Active employment status (coefficient 9.0, P = .008) and localized disease (coefficient 7.5, P = .030) were related to more logistical challenges. Conclusion: Age and cancer stage were related to Chinese cancer patients’ perceived expectations and barriers toward TCM use. Understanding these attitudes is important for reshaping the role that TCM plays in China’s patient-centered comprehensive cancer care model.