Julian Maamari

Dr. Julian Maamari

Mayo Clinic
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 December 2019 in Gastroenterology Report
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EREva Rajha
Eva Rajha
PCPatrick Chaftari
Patrick Chaftari
MKMona Kamal
Mona Kamal
Julian MaamariJulian Maamari
Julian Maamari
CCChristopher Chaftari
Christopher Chaftari
SYSai-Ching Jim Yeung
Sai-Ching Jim Yeung
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer therapy and is now the standard treatment for several different types of cancer, supported by favorable outcomes and good tolerance. However, it is linked to multiple immune manifestations, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events frequently affect the skin, colon, endocrine glands, lungs, and liver. The gastrointestinal system is one of the most commonly affected organ systems and is responsible for the most frequent emergency visits resulting from irAEs. However, because immune checkpoint inhibitors are a recent addition to our arsenal of cancer drugs, many health-care providers remain unfamiliar with the management of irAEs. Gastroenterologists involved in the treatment of oncology patients who have received checkpoint inhibitors are currently encountering cases of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and other nonspecific symptoms that may be challenging to manage. This article reviews the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and provides an approach to their diagnosis and recommended workup. It also highlights the management of irAEs according to their toxicity grading and specifically discusses the instances in which corticosteroids should be administered and/or the immune checkpoint inhibitors should be withheld.

1 February 2019 in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Julian MaamariJulian Maamari
Julian Maamari
SYSai-Ching J. Yeung
Sai-Ching J. Yeung
PCPatrick S Chaftari
Patrick S Chaftari

27 January 2022 in Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Julian MaamariJulian Maamari
Julian Maamari
ATAaron J. Tande
Aaron J. Tande
FDFelix Diehn
Felix Diehn
DTDon Bambino Geno Tai
Don Bambino Geno Tai
EBElie F. Berbari
Elie F. Berbari
Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) is a potentially fatal infection which has seen a gradual increase in its incidence over the past decades. The infection is insidious, presenting with symptoms of back pain. Fever is present in about 60 % of patients. Prompt diagnosis of NVO is important to prevent the development of complications. Numerous laboratory and imaging tools can be deployed to accurately establish the diagnosis. Imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance, nuclear imaging, and computed tomography are essential in diagnosing NVO but can also be useful in image-guided biopsies. Laboratory tools include routine blood tests, inflammatory markers, and routine culture techniques of aspirated specimens. Recent advances in molecular techniques can assist in identifying offending pathogen(s). In this review, we detail the arsenal of techniques that can be utilized to reach a diagnosis of NVO.

7 February 2023 in The Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Julian MaamariJulian Maamari
Julian Maamari
SGStephanie L Grach
Stephanie L Grach
MPMatteo Passerini
Matteo Passerini
EKElissa A. Kinzelman-Vesely
Elissa A. Kinzelman-Vesely
ANAhmad Nassr
Ahmad Nassr
EBElie F. Berbari
Elie F. Berbari

16 November 2022 in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Julian MaamariJulian Maamari
Julian Maamari
ATAaron J Tande
Aaron J Tande
DTDon Bambino Geno Tai
Don Bambino Geno Tai
FDFelix E Diehn
Felix E Diehn
CRCourtney Ross
Courtney Ross
EBElie F. Berbari
Elie F. Berbari
Background: Image-guided biopsies in patients with suspected native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) are recommended to establish the microbiological diagnosis and guide antibiotic therapy. Despite recent advances, the microbiological yield of this procedure remains between 48% and 52%. A better understanding of factors associated with this low yield may lead to improved microbiological diagnosis. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with suspected NVO undergoing image-guided biopsies from January 2011 to June 2021 at our institution. Two hundred nine patients undergoing 248 percutaneous biopsies were included. Demographic data, biopsy and microbiologic techniques, clinical characteristics, and antibiotic use were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with microbiological yield. Results: A total of 110 of 209 (52.6%) initial image-guided biopsies revealed positive microbiological results. This number increased to 121 of 209 (57.9%) when repeat image-guided biopsies were included. In multivariable analysis, aspiration of fluid was associated with a 3-fold increased odds of yielding a positive result (odds ratio [OR], 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39–7.04; P = .006), whereas prior antibiotic use was associated with a 3-fold decreased yield (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, .16–.65; P = .002). A univariate subgroup analysis revealed a significant association between the length of the antibiotic-free period and microbiological yield, with the lowest rates of pathogen detection at 0–3 days and higher rates as duration increased (P = .017). Conclusions: Prior antibiotic use in patients with suspected NVO was associated with a decrease in the microbiological yield of image-guided biopsies. An antibiotic-free period of at least 4 days is suggested to maximize yield. Successful fluid aspiration during the procedure also increases microbiological yield.

13 August 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPatrick S Chaftari
Patrick S Chaftari
Aiham QdaisatAiham Qdaisat
Aiham Qdaisat
ACAnne-Marie P. Chaftari
Anne-Marie P. Chaftari
Julian MaamariJulian Maamari
Julian Maamari
ZLZiyi Li
Ziyi Li
Sai-Ching Jim YeungSai-Ching Jim Yeung
Sai-Ching Jim Yeung
Cancer patients have increased risk of infections, and often present to emergency departments with infection-related problems where physicians must make decisions based on a snapshot of the patient’s condition. Although C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate are popular biomarkers of sepsis, their use in guiding emergency care of cancer patients with infections is unclear. Using these biomarkers, we created a prediction model for short-term mortality in cancer patients with suspected infection. We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients who visited the emergency department of MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1 April 2018 and 30 April 2019. A clinical decision model was developed using multiple logistic regression for various clinical and laboratory biomarkers; coefficients were used to generate a prediction score stratifying patients into four groups according to their 14-day mortality risk. The prediction score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.85–0.91) in predicting 14-day mortality. The prediction score also accurately predicted intensive care unit admission and 30-day mortality. Our simple new scoring system for mortality prediction, based on readily available clinical and laboratory data, including procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and lactate, can be used in emergency departments for cancer patients with suspected infection.