Anders Lobner-Olesen

Prof. Anders Lobner-Olesen

Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2005 in Nature Reviews Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKenn Gerdes
Kenn Gerdes
SCSusanne K. Christensen
Susanne K. Christensen
Anders Lobner-OlesenAnders Lobner-Olesen
Anders Lobner-Olesen

1 June 1989 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anders Lobner-OlesenAnders Lobner-Olesen
Anders Lobner-Olesen
KSKirsten Skarstad
Kirsten Skarstad
FHFlemming G. Hansen
Flemming G. Hansen
KMKaspar von Meyenburg
Kaspar von Meyenburg
EBErik Boye
Erik Boye

1 October 2003 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKThomas Kruse
Thomas Kruse
JMJakob Møller-Jensen
Jakob Møller-Jensen
Anders Lobner-OlesenAnders Lobner-Olesen
Anders Lobner-Olesen
KGKenn Gerdes
Kenn Gerdes
The mechanism of prokaryotic chromosome segregation is not known. MreB, an actin homolog, is a shape‐determining factor in rod‐shaped prokaryotic cells. Using immunofluorescence microscopy we found that MreB of Escherichia coli formed helical filaments located beneath the cell surface. Flow cytometric and cytological analyses indicated that MreB‐depleted cells segregated their chromosomes in pairs, consistent with chromosome cohesion. Overexpression of wild‐type MreB inhibited cell division but did not perturb chromosome segregation. Overexpression of mutant forms of MreB inhibited cell division, caused abnormal MreB filament morphology and induced severe localization defects of the nucleoid and of the oriC and terC chromosomal regions. The chromosomal terminus regions appeared cohered in both MreB‐depleted cells and in cells overexpressing mutant forms of MreB. Our observations indicate that MreB filaments participate in directional chromosome movement and segregation.

1 April 2005 in Current Opinion in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anders Lobner-OlesenAnders Lobner-Olesen
Anders Lobner-Olesen
OSOle Skovgaard
Ole Skovgaard
MMMartin G Marinus
Martin G Marinus

1 September 1990 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBErik Boye
Erik Boye
Anders Lobner-OlesenAnders Lobner-Olesen
Anders Lobner-Olesen

1 December 2000 in EMBO Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBErik Boye
Erik Boye
Anders Lobner-OlesenAnders Lobner-Olesen
Anders Lobner-Olesen
KSKirsten Skarstad
Kirsten Skarstad
In Escherichia coli cells, the origin of chromosomal replication is temporarily inactivated after initiation has occurred. Origin sequestration is the first line of defence against over‐initiation, providing a time window during which the initiation potential can be reduced by: (i) titration of DnaA proteins to newly replicated chromosomal elements; (ii) regulation of the activity of the DnaA initiator protein; and (iii) sequestration of the dnaA gene promoter. This review represents the first attempt to consider together older and more recent data on such inactivation mechanisms in order to analyze their contributions to the overall tight replication control observed in vivo . All cells have developed mechanisms for origin inactivation, but those of other bacteria and eukaryotic cells are clearly distinct from those of E. coli . Possible differences and similarities are discussed.