Thromboembolic events are the second cause of death in cancer patients. In ovarian cancer, 3–10% of patients present with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the incidence may rise to 36% along the disease course. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial-derived growth factor, and in in vitro studies it showed a predisposition to hemostasis perturbation, including thrombosis. However, in vivo and clinical studies have shown conflicting results for its use as a treatment for ovarian cancer, so we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of arterial thromboembolism (ATE) and VTE in ovarian cancer patients treated with bevacizumab. The review comprised 14 trials with 6221 patients: ATE incidence was reported in 5 (4811 patients) where the absolute risk was 2.4% with bevacizumab vs. 1.1% without (RR 2.45; 95% CI 1.27–4.27, p = 0.008). VTE incidence was reported in 9 trials (5121 patients) where the absolute risk was 5.4% with bevacizumab vs. 3.7% without (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.02–1.79, p = 0.04). Our analysis showed that the risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism increased in patients treated with bevacizumab. Thrombolic events (TEs) are probably underreported, and studies should discriminate between ATE and VTE. Bevacizumab can be considered as an additional risk factor when selecting patients for primary prophylaxis with anticoagulants.

Outcomes of patients with relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) remain poor, despite the widespread incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into contemporary treatment algorithms. Although programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade with pembrolizumab, administered either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, has become the cornerstone of first line therapy for patients with PD-L1 positive disease, durable clinical benefit is achieved in only a minority of cases. This narrative review explores the most promising systemic treatment strategies expected to shape the management of R/M HNSCC over the coming decade, including bispecific antibodies, HPV directed therapeutic vaccines, antibody–drug conjugates, and other emerging modalities. We discuss their underlying mechanisms of action, review clinical data from early phase studies, and highlight ongoing phase III trials with the potential to redefine future treatment paradigms in R/M HNSCC.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy but are often complicated by immune-related adverse events, particularly colitis. With increasing ICI use, understanding the clinical course and management of ICI-induced colitis is essential. Objectives: To characterize the clinical, endoscopic, and histological features of ICI-induced colitis and evaluate treatment outcomes, focusing on the use of corticosteroids and second-line biologicals (infliximab and vedolizumab) in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Ghent University Hospital, including 77 adult patients diagnosed with ICI-induced colitis in between 2012 and 2023. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histological data were analyzed, along with treatment response and safety outcomes. Results: Patients with ICI-induced colitis received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (64.9%), anti-CTLA-4 (9.1%), or combination of both (26.0%). In patients with normal endoscopic findings, histological signs of colitis were observed in 88.0%. Combination ICI therapy was associated with higher Mayo scores (p = 0.029) and increased need for biologicals (p = 0.011) compared to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Clinical response rates were 79.6% with corticosteroids and 100.0% with biologicals. Rechallenge with ICIs lead to a 17.4% relapse rate. No colitis-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, we demonstrate that random colon biopsies reveal microscopic ICI-induced colitis in most patients with absence of endoscopic disease. Combination ICI therapy predicts a corticosteroid-refractory course, supporting the need for early escalation to biologicals. ICI rechallenge appears feasible, as relapse rates were relatively low and colitis morbidity remained manageable. Prospective studies are needed to refine therapeutic strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Immune-related hepatitis (irH) is a fairly frequent complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Its management is generally based on withholding ICIs and on the rapid initiation of corticosteroids, which is successful in 63 to 96% of cases. Mycofenolate mofetil (MMF) is accepted as a second-line immunosuppressant in the case of the failure of corticosteroids. In rare cases, though, irH is also resistant to MMF and may lead to liver failure. There are no standard third-line treatments and current guidelines are based on a limited number of case reports. We present a case of a metastatic melanoma patient with an immune-related hepatitis refractory to corticosteroids and MMF, that was successfully reversed with tacrolimus. Unfortunately, this was complicated with a serious infection and progressive disease, which illustrates the complexity of treatment of steroid-refractory immunotherapy-related adverse events. Furthermore, we provided a literature review regarding the management of steroid-refractory hepatitis and proposed a strategy to circumvent the current uncertainties in the management of steroid-refractory irH.