Objective: To compare the performance of the Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS), pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PRS) and AIMS65 score in predicting specific clinical endpoints following variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH). Material and methods: Between January 2008 and December 2013, we retrospectively analyzed 225 consecutive hospitalized patients managed for endoscopically confirmed UGIH. Results: A total of 225 patients (mean age 61.3 years), mostly diagnosed with alcoholic cirrhosis (195/86.7%), presented with variceal UGIH during the study period. Rebleeding occurred in 22 (9.8%) patients and 30-day mortality was 39 (17.3%). Initial hemostasis was achieved with N-butyl cyanoacrylate (151/79.1%) and endoscopic variceal ligation (40/20.9%), while secondary rebleeding prophylaxis in 110 (48.9%) patients was accomplished using endoscopic variceal ligation (92%). The majority of patients died from the underlying disease, while 12 (30.8%) died from bleeding. Median hospital stay was 6 (1–35) days. There was no statistically significant difference among AIMS65, GBS and PRS in predicting mortality (AUROC 0.70 vs. 0.64 vs. 0.66) or rebleeding rates (AUROC 0.74 vs. 0.60 vs. 0.67). The GBS was superior in predicting the need for blood transfusion compared to AIMS65 score (AUROC 0.75 vs. 0.61, p = 0.01) and PRS (AUROC 0.75 vs. 0.58, p = 0.009). Conclusions: The AIMS65, GBS and PRS scores are comparable but not useful for predicting outcome in patients with variceal UGIH because of poor discriminative ability. The GBS is superior in predicting the need for transfusion compared to AIMS65 score and PRS.

Background: Derangement of liver blood tests (LBT) is frequent in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate (a) the prevalence of deranged LBT as well as their association with (b) clinical severity at admission and (c) 30-day outcomes among the hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: Consecutive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in the regional referral center over the 12-month period were included. Clinical severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission and 30-day outcomes (need for intensive care, mechanical ventilation, or death) were analyzed. Results: Derangement of LBT occurred in 2854/3812 (74.9%) of patients, most frequently due to elevation of AST (61.6%), GGT (46.1%) and ALT (33.4%). Elevated AST, ALT, GGT and low albumin were associated with more severe disease at admission. However, in multivariate Cox regression analysis, when adjusted for age, sex, obesity and presence of chronic liver disease, only AST remained associated with the risk of dying (HR 1.5081 and 2.1315, for elevations 1–3 × ULN and >3 × ULN, respectively) independently of comorbidity burden and COVID-19 severity at admission. Patients with more severe liver injury more frequently experienced defined adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Deranged LBTs are common among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and might be used as predictors of adverse clinical outcomes.

As the burden of liver disease in the general populace steadily increases, so does the need for both advanced diagnostic and treatment options. Endoscopic ultrasound is a reliable diagnostic and therapeutic method that has an established role, foremost in pancreatobiliary pathology. This paper aims to summarize the growing role of endoscopic ultrasound in hepatology based on the search of the current literature. A number of applications of endoscopic ultrasound are reviewed, including both noninvasive methods and tissue acquisition in focal and diffuse liver disease, portal hypertension measurement, detection and management of gastric and esophageal varices, treatment of focal liver lesions and staging of pancreatobiliary malignancies, treatment of cystic and solid liver lesions, as well as liver abscess drainage. Both hepatologists and endoscopists should be aware of the evolving role of endoscopic ultrasound in liver disease. The inherent invasive nature of endoscopic examination limits its use to a targeted population identified using noninvasive methods. Endoscopic ultrasound is one the most versatile methods in gastroenterology, allowing immediate access with detection, sampling, and treatment of digestive tract pathology. Further expansion of its use in hepatology is immanent.

Background/Objectives: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder marked by relapsing episodes of gastrointestinal inflammation, potentially causing severe symptoms. These unpredictable acute episodes, paired with chronic disabilities, such as fatigue and malabsorption, and extensive pharmacological and surgical treatments, can severely impact patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to assess which aspects of the patients’ lives IBD impacts, and how IBD patients perceive their disease. Methods: All IBD patients who had an appointment in our tertiary centre from 10 October 2022 to 21 February 2023, were invited to complete anonymous questionnaires. The questionnaires used were IBDQ-32, WPAI, and IBD Disk, all designed specifically to assess the IBD patients’ quality of life. Results: The questionnaires were completed by a total of 159 participants, 51% of whom were males, 47.9% who had UC, and 49.4% who had been or were currently treated with biologics. There was no statistically significant difference in the answers from patients with CD compared to UC, as well as those treated with conventional therapies compared to those with advanced options. Most of them considered their health to be good, but only a few (12.8%) claimed, with absolute certainty, that their health was at the level of healthy individuals, and only 13 (8.3%) claimed their health was excellent. A total of 95 (60.1%) participants expressed at least minor limitations when performing strenuous activities, but lighter forms of activities were not affected as much by the disease. A significant portion (48.7%) of the participants believed they were exposed to more stress than others, and their current pharmacological therapy was the cause of fear in 26.5%. A total of 119 (75.3%) participants believed that the disease affected their lives at least mildly during remission. Conclusions: Our study showed that IBD patients have diminished quality of life, not only in the periods of active disease but also during clinical remission. The decline in quality of life was not solely attributed to physical symptoms, as previously thought. Other factors, such as mental health issues, were found to impact quality of life as well. We firmly believe that restoring quality of life should be emphasised in guidelines as one of the most important therapeutic goals.

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic is affecting public health systems and mental health significantly. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are witnessing vigorous organizational changes in inflammatory bowel disease centers and experiencing all psychosocial effects of the crisis. We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study in order to assess inflammatory bowel disease patients’ concerns, behavior, and satisfaction with provided healthcare during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Methods: All inflammatory bowel disease patients treated in our center from April 1 to June 1, 2020, were invited to fulfill an anonymous online questionnaire. Results: A total of 132 participants have completed the questionnaire, 63.2% were female, 57.9% had Crohn’s disease (CD) During the first wave of the pandemic, 74.2% of participants perceived themselves as a high-risk group for acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 only because they suffered from inflammatory bowel disease, and 66.2% thought inflammatory bowel disease medications make them more susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019. This especially concerned patients treated with biologics (B = 2.068, P < .01). Females were more stressed (B = −1.451, P < .01) and concerned (B = −1.488, P < .01) about the pandemic, and they also reported more potential benefits from professional psychological help (B = −2.664, P = .02). Six patients (5.3%) discontinued inflammatory bowel disease therapy on their own initiative. Seventy-eight (68.4%) patients were completely satisfied and 14 (12.3%) were partially satisfied with the quality of healthcare provided in our inflammatory bowel disease center. Conclusion: Female inflammatory bowel disease patients tend to be more emotionally vulnerable during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Although psychological support should be continuously available to all inflammatory bowel disease patients, female gender may warrant special attention. Providing patients with adequate and early information during pandemic probably leads to better compliance and higher satisfaction. Cite this article as: Hrabar D, Cacic P, Biscanin A, et al. IBD patients’ perception of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and satisfaction with provided healthcare: A cross-sectional study. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022;33(3):190-195.