James Janopaul-Naylor

Dr. James Janopaul-Naylor

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJames Janopaul-Naylor
James Janopaul-Naylor
YSYang Shen
Yang Shen
DQDavid Qian
David Qian
ZBZachary Buchwald
Zachary Buchwald
Radiotherapy has been used for more than a hundred years to cure or locally control tumors. Regression of tumors outside of the irradiated field was occasionally observed and is known as the abscopal effect. However, the occurrence of systemic anti-tumor effects was deemed too rare and unpredictable to be a therapeutic goal. Recent studies suggest that immunotherapy and radiation in combination may enhance the abscopal response. Increasing numbers of cases are being reported since the routine implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, showing that combined radiotherapy with immunotherapy has a synergistic effect on both local and distant (i.e., unirradiated) tumors. In this review, we summarize pre-clinical and clinical reports, with a specific focus on the mechanisms behind the immunostimulatory effects of radiation and how this is enhanced by immunotherapy.

20 July 2022 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNeal S. McCall
Neal S. McCall
HMHamilton S. McGinnis
Hamilton S. McGinnis
JJJames Janopaul-Naylor
James Janopaul-Naylor
AKAparna H. Kesarwala
Aparna H. Kesarwala
STSibo Tian
Sibo Tian
KHKristin A. Higgins
Kristin A. Higgins

12 October 2023 in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJames Janopaul-Naylor
James Janopaul-Naylor
AKAndee Koo
Andee Koo
DQDavid C. Qian
David C. Qian
NMNeal S. McCall
Neal S. McCall
YLYuan Liu
Yuan Liu
SPSagar A. Patel
Sagar A. Patel
Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are a new, publicly available tool for patients to access health care–related information with unknown reliability related to cancer-related questions. This study assesses the quality of responses to common questions for patients with cancer. Methods: From February to March 2023, we queried chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) from OpenAI and Bing AI from Microsoft questions from the American Cancer Society’s recommended “Questions to Ask About Your Cancer” customized for all stages of breast, colon, lung, and prostate cancer. Questions were, in addition, grouped by type (prognosis, treatment, or miscellaneous). The quality of AI chatbot responses was assessed by an expert panel using the validated DISCERN criteria. Results: Of the 117 questions presented to ChatGPT and Bing, the average score for all questions were 3.9 and 3.2, respectively (P < 0.001) and the overall DISCERN scores were 4.1 and 4.4, respectively. By disease site, the average score for ChatGPT and Bing, respectively, were 3.9 and 3.6 for prostate cancer (P = 0.02), 3.7 and 3.3 for lung cancer (P < 0.001), 4.1 and 2.9 for breast cancer (P < 0.001), and 3.8 and 3.0 for colorectal cancer (P < 0.001). By type of question, the average score for ChatGPT and Bing, respectively, were 3.6 and 3.4 for prognostic questions (P = 0.12), 3.9 and 3.1 for treatment questions (P < 0.001), and 4.2 and 3.3 for miscellaneous questions (P = 0.001). For 3 responses (3%) by ChatGPT and 18 responses (15%) by Bing, at least one panelist rated them as having serious or extensive shortcomings. Conclusions: AI chatbots provide multiple opportunities for innovating health care. This analysis suggests a critical need, particularly around cancer prognostication, for continual refinement to limit misleading counseling, confusion, and emotional distress to patients and families.

3 August 2023 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJames Janopaul-Naylor
James Janopaul-Naylor
TCTaylor J. Corriher
Taylor J. Corriher
JSJeffrey Switchenko
Jeffrey Switchenko
SHSheela Hanasoge
Sheela Hanasoge
AEAshanda Esdaille
Ashanda Esdaille
SPSagar A. Patel
Sagar A. Patel
Background: Delayed access to care may contribute to disparities in prostate cancer (PCa). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) aimed at increasing access and reducing healthcare disparities, but its impact on timely treatment initiation for PCa men is unknown.Methods: Men with intermediate‐ and high‐risk PCa diagnosed 2010–2016 and treated with curative surgery or radiotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the effect of race and insurance type on treatment delay >180 days after diagnosis. Cochran–Armitage test measured annual trends in delays, and joinpoint regression assessed if 2014, the year the ACA became fully operationalized, was significant for inflection in crude rates of major delays.Results: Of 422,506 eligible men, 18,720 (4.4%) experienced >180‐day delay in treatment initiation. Compared to White patients, Black (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.72–1.87, p < 0.001) and Hispanic (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28–1.48, p < 0.001) patients had higher odds of delay. Compared to uninsured, those with Medicaid had no difference in odds of delay (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84–1.06, p = 0.31), while those with private insurance (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52–0.63, p < 0.001) or Medicare (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.58–0.70, p < 0.001) had lower odds of delay. Mean time to treatment significantly increased from 2010 to 2016 across all racial/ethnic groups (trend p < 0.001); 2014 was associated with a significant inflection for increase in rates of major delays.Conclusions: Non‐White and Medicaid‐insured men with localized PCa are at risk of treatment delays in the United States. Treatment delays have been consistently rising, particularly after implementation of the ACA.

19 June 2021 in Practical Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJames Janopaul-Naylor
James Janopaul-Naylor
DQDavid Qian
David Qian
MKMohammad Khan
Mohammad Khan
SBSusan Brown
Susan Brown
JLJolinta Lin
Jolinta Lin
PPPretesh Patel
Pretesh Patel

19 March 2022 in Advances in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJames Janopaul-Naylor
James Janopaul-Naylor
TLTian Liu
Tian Liu
BZBoran Zhou
Boran Zhou
XYXiaofeng Yang
Xiaofeng Yang
NMNeal S. McCall
Neal S. McCall
AJAshesh B. Jani
Ashesh B. Jani