Timm B. Poeppl

Prof. Dr. Timm B. Poeppl

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPeter M. Kreuzer
Peter M. Kreuzer
MLMichael Landgrebe
Michael Landgrebe
OHOliver Husser
Oliver Husser
MRMarkus Resch
Markus Resch
MSMartin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann
BLBerthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth
Background: Vagus nerve stimulation has been successfully used as a treatment strategy for epilepsy and affective disorders for years. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a new non-invasive method to stimulate the vagus nerve, which has been shown to modulate neuronal activity in distinct brain areas. Objectives: Here we report effects of tVNS on cardiac function from a pilot study, which was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and safety of tVNS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus. Methods: Twenty-four patients with chronic tinnitus underwent treatment with tVNS over 3–10 weeks in an open single-armed pilot study. Safety criteria and practical usability of the neurostimulating device were to investigate by clinical examination and electrocardiography at baseline and at several visits during and after tVNS treatment (week 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24). Results: Two adverse cardiac events (one classified as a severe adverse event) were registered but considered very unlikely to have been caused by the tVNS device. Retrospective analyses of electrocardiographic parameters revealed a trend toward shortening of the QRS complex after tVNS. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is one of the first studies investigating feasibility and safety of tVNS in a clinical sample. In those subjects with no known pre-existing cardiac pathology, preliminary data do not indicate arrhythmic effects of tVNS.

14 May 2013 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TPTimm B. Poeppl
Timm B. Poeppl
BLBerthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth
ALAngela R. Laird
Angela R. Laird
SESimon B. Eickhoff
Simon B. Eickhoff

23 July 2018 in Molecular Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TPTimm B. Poeppl
Timm B. Poeppl
MDMaximilian R. Donges
Maximilian R. Donges
AMAndreas Mokros
Andreas Mokros
RRRainer Rupprecht
Rainer Rupprecht
PFPeter T. Fox
Peter T. Fox
SESimon B. Eickhoff
Simon B. Eickhoff

1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BLBerthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth
MSMartin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann
ALAstrid Lehner
Astrid Lehner
MLMichael Landgrebe
Michael Landgrebe
TPTimm B. Poeppl
Timm B. Poeppl
DRDirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder
An inherent limitation of functional imaging studies is their correlational approach. More information about critical contributions of specific brain regions can be gained by focal transient perturbation of neural activity in specific regions with non-invasive focal brain stimulation methods. Functional imaging studies have revealed that tinnitus is related to alterations in neuronal activity of central auditory pathways. Modulation of neuronal activity in auditory cortical areas by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can reduce tinnitus loudness and, if applied repeatedly, exerts therapeutic effects, confirming the relevance of auditory cortex activation for tinnitus generation and persistence. Measurements of oscillatory brain activity before and after rTMS demonstrate that the same stimulation protocol has different effects on brain activity in different patients, presumably related to interindividual differences in baseline activity in the clinically heterogeneous study cohort. In addition to alterations in auditory pathways, imaging techniques also indicate the involvement of non-auditory brain areas, such as the fronto-parietal “awareness” network and the non-tinnitus-specific distress network consisting of the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and amygdale. Involvement of the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region putatively reflects the relevance of memory mechanisms in the persistence of the phantom percept and the associated distress. Preliminary studies targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and the parietal cortex with rTMS and with transcranial direct current stimulation confirm the relevance of the mentioned non-auditory networks. Available data indicate the important value added by brain stimulation as a complementary approach to neuroimaging for identifying the neuronal correlates of the various clinical aspects of tinnitus.

1 October 2016 in Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPTimm B. Poeppl
Timm B. Poeppl
BLBerthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth
RRRainer Rupprecht
Rainer Rupprecht
Adam SafronAdam Safron
Adam Safron
DBDanilo Bzdok
Danilo Bzdok
SESimon B. Eickhoff
Simon B. Eickhoff

1 January 2011 in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPeter Michael Kreuzer
Peter Michael Kreuzer
MLMichael Landgrebe
Michael Landgrebe
MSMartin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann
TPTimm B. Poeppl
Timm B. Poeppl
VVVeronika Vielsmeier
Veronika Vielsmeier
BLBerthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth
Objectives: Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the temporal cortex has been investigated as a new treatment tool for chronic tinnitus during the last years and has shown moderate efficacy. However, there is growing evidence that tinnitus is not a pathology of a specific brain region, but rather the result of network dysfunction involving both auditory and non-auditory brain regions. In functional imaging studies the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been identified as an important hub in tinnitus related networks and has been shown to particularly reflect the affective components of tinnitus. Based on these findings we aimed to investigate whether the effects of left low-frequency rTMS can be enhanced by antecedent right prefrontal low-frequency rTMS. Study Design: Fifty-six patients were randomized to receive either low-frequency left temporal rTMS or a combination of low-frequency right prefrontal followed by low-frequency left temporal rTMS. The change of the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) score was the primary outcome, secondary outcome parameters included the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, numeric rating scales, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01261949). Results: Directly after therapy there was a significant improvement of the TQ-score in both groups. Comparison of both groups revealed a trend toward more pronounced effects for the combined group (effect size: Cohen’s d = 0.176), but this effect did not reach significance. A persistent trend toward better efficacy was also observed in all other outcome criteria. Conclusion: Additional stimulation of the right prefrontal cortex seems to be a promising strategy for enhancing TMS effects over the temporal cortex. These results further support the involvement of the right DLPFC in the pathophysiology of tinnitus. The small effect size might be due to the study design comparing the protocol to an active control condition.