Suzanne Dickson

Dr. Suzanne Dickson

Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2002 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VWVille Raymond Wallenius
Ville Raymond Wallenius
KWKristina Wallenius
Kristina Wallenius
BABo Ahrén
Bo Ahrén
MRMats Rudling
Mats Rudling
HCHans Carlsten
Hans Carlsten
JJJohn-Olov Jansson
John-Olov Jansson

1 June 2015 in Molecular Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TMT.D. Müller
T.D. Müller
RNRuben Nogueiras
Ruben Nogueiras
MAM.L. Andermann
M.L. Andermann
ZAZ.B. Andrews
Z.B. Andrews
SAS.D. Anker
S.D. Anker
MTM.H. Tschöp
M.H. Tschöp
The gastrointestinal peptide hormone ghrelin was discovered in 1999 as the endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Increasing evidence supports more complicated and nuanced roles for the hormone, which go beyond the regulation of systemic energy metabolism. In this review, we discuss the diverse biological functions of ghrelin, the regulation of its secretion, and address questions that still remain 15 years after its discovery. In recent years, ghrelin has been found to have a plethora of central and peripheral actions in distinct areas including learning and memory, gut motility and gastric acid secretion, sleep/wake rhythm, reward seeking behavior, taste sensation and glucose metabolism.

1 November 2014 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJohannes Hebebrand
Johannes Hebebrand
ÖAÖzgür Albayrak
Özgür Albayrak
RARoger Adan
Roger Adan
JAJochen Antel
Jochen Antel
CDCarlos Dieguez
Carlos Dieguez
SDSuzanne Dickson
Suzanne Dickson
"Food addiction" has become a focus of interest for researchers attempting to explain certain processes and/or behaviors that may contribute to the development of obesity. Although the scientific discussion on "food addiction" is in its nascent stage, it has potentially important implications for treatment and prevention strategies. As such, it is important to critically reflect on the appropriateness of the term "food addiction", which combines the concepts of "substance-based" and behavioral addiction. The currently available evidence for a substance-based food addiction is poor, partly because systematic clinical and translational studies are still at an early stage. We do however view both animal and existing human data as consistent with the existence of addictive eating behavior. Accordingly, we stress that similar to other behaviors eating can become an addiction in thus predisposed individuals under specific environmental circumstances. Here, we introduce current diagnostic and neurobiological concepts of substance-related and non-substance-related addictive disorders, and highlight the similarities and dissimilarities between addiction and overeating. We conclude that "food addiction" is a misnomer because of the ambiguous connotation of a substance-related phenomenon. We instead propose the term "eating addiction" to underscore the behavioral addiction to eating; future research should attempt to define the diagnostic criteria for an eating addiction, for which DSM-5 now offers an umbrella via the introduction on Non-Substance-Related Disorders within the category Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

1 December 2019 in European Neuropsychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RARoger Adan
Roger Adan
EBEline M. van der Beek
Eline M. van der Beek
JBJan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar
JCJohn F. Cryan
John F. Cryan
JHJohannes Hebebrand
Johannes Hebebrand
SDSuzanne Dickson
Suzanne Dickson
Does it matter what we eat for our mental health? Accumulating data suggests that this may indeed be the case and that diet and nutrition are not only critical for human physiology and body composition, but also have significant effects on mood and mental wellbeing. While the determining factors of mental health are complex, increasing evidence indicates a strong association between a poor diet and the exacerbation of mood disorders, including anxiety and depression, as well as other neuropsychiatric conditions. There are common beliefs about the health effects of certain foods that are not supported by solid evidence and the scientific evidence demonstrating the unequivocal link between nutrition and mental health is only beginning to emerge. Current epidemiological data on nutrition and mental health do not provide information about causality or underlying mechanisms. Future studies should focus on elucidating mechanism. Randomized controlled trials should be of high quality, adequately powered and geared towards the advancement of knowledge from population-based observations towards personalized nutrition. Here, we provide an overview of the emerging field of nutritional psychiatry, exploring the scientific evidence exemplifying the importance of a well-balanced diet for mental health. We conclude that an experimental medicine approach and a mechanistic understanding is required to provide solid evidence on which future policies on diet and nutrition for mental health can be based.

6 December 2006 in Addiction Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EJElisabet Jerlhag
Elisabet Jerlhag
EEEmil Egecioglu
Emil Egecioglu
SDSuzanne Dickson
Suzanne Dickson
ADAnnika Douhan
Annika Douhan
LSLennart Svensson
Lennart Svensson
JEJörgen A. Engel
Jörgen A. Engel

4 April 2012 in The Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSuzanne Dickson
Suzanne Dickson
RSRozita H. Shirazi
Rozita H. Shirazi
CHCaroline Hansson
Caroline Hansson
Filip BergquistFilip Bergquist
Filip Bergquist
HNHans Nissbrandt
Hans Nissbrandt
KSKarolina P. Skibicka
Karolina P. Skibicka
The glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) system is a recently established target for type 2 diabetes treatment. In addition to regulating glucose homeostasis, GLP-1 also reduces food intake. Previous studies demonstrate that the anorexigenic effects of GLP-1 can be mediated through hypothalamic and brainstem circuits which regulate homeostatic feeding. Here, we demonstrate an entirely novel neurobiological mechanism for GLP-1-induced anorexia in rats, involving direct effects of a GLP-1 agonist, Exendin-4 (EX4) on food reward that are exerted at the level of the mesolimbic reward system. We assessed the impact of peripheral, central, and intramesolimbic EX4 on two models of food reward: conditioned place preference (CPP) and progressive ratio operant-conditioning. Food-reward behavior was reduced in the CPP test by EX4, as rats no longer preferred an environment previously paired to chocolate pellets. EX4 also decreased motivated behavior for sucrose in a progressive ratio operant-conditioning paradigm when administered peripherally. We show that this effect is mediated centrally, via GLP-1 receptors (GLP-1Rs). GLP-1Rs are expressed in several key nodes of the mesolimbic reward system; however, their function remains unexplored. Thus we sought to determine the neurobiological substrates underlying the food-reward effect. We found that the EX4-mediated inhibition of food reward could be driven from two key mesolimbic structures—ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens—without inducing concurrent malaise or locomotor impairment. The current findings, that activation of central GLP-1Rs strikingly suppresses food reward/motivation by interacting with the mesolimbic system, indicate an entirely novel mechanism by which the GLP-1R stimulation affects feeding-oriented behavior.