Summary: Here, we describe bsrG/SR4, a novel type I toxin–antitoxin system from the SPβ prophage region of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. The 294‐nucleotide bsrG RNA encodes a 38‐amino‐acid toxin, whereas SR4 is a 180‐nucleotide antisense RNA that acts as the antitoxin. Both genes overlap by 123 nucleotides. BsrG expression increases at the onset of stationary phase. The sr4 promoter is 6‐ to 10‐fold stronger than the bsrG promoter. Deletion of sr4 stabilizes bsrG mRNA and causes cell lysis on agar plates, which is due to the BsrG peptide and not the bsrG mRNA. SR4 overexpression could compensate cell lysis caused by overexpression of bsrG. SR4 interacts with the 3′ UTR of bsrG RNA, thereby promoting its degradation. RNase III cleaves the bsrG RNA/SR4 duplex at position 185 of bsrG RNA, but is not essential for the function of the toxin–antitoxin system. Endoribonuclease Y and 3′‐5′ exoribonuclease R participate in the degradation of both bsrG RNA and SR4, whereas PnpA processes three SR4 precursors to the mature RNA. A heat shock at 48°C results in faster degradation and, therefore, significantly decreased amounts of bsrG RNA.

Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) that act by base-pairing were first discovered in so-called accessory DNA elements--plasmids, phages, and transposons--where they control replication, maintenance, and transposition. Since 2001, a huge body of work has been performed to predict and identify sRNAs in a multitude of bacterial genomes. The majority of chromosome-encoded sRNAs have been investigated in E. coli and other Gram-negative bacteria. However, during the past five years an increasing number of sRNAs were found in Gram-positive bacteria. Here, we outline our current knowledge on chromosome-encoded sRNAs from low-GC Gram-positive species that act by base-pairing, i.e., an antisense mechanism. We will focus on sRNAs with known targets and defined regulatory mechanisms with special emphasis on Bacillus subtilis.

Summary: Small non‐coding RNAs (sRNAs) have been found to regulate gene expression in all three kingdoms of life. So far, relatively little is known about sRNAs from Gram‐positive bacteria. SR1 is a regulatory sRNA from the Bacillus subtilis chromosome that inhibits by base‐pairing translation initiation of ahrC mRNA encoding a transcriptional activator of the arginine catabolic operons. Here we present a novel target of SR1, the glycolytic gapA operon. Both microarray and Northern blot analyses show that the amount of gapA operon mRNA is significantly higher in the presence of SR1 when cells were grown in complex medium until stationary phase. Translational lacZ fusions and toeprinting analyses demonstrate that SR1 does not promote translation of gapA mRNA. By contrast, the half‐life of gapA operon mRNA is strongly reduced in the sr1 knockout strain. SR1 does not act as a base‐pairing sRNA on gapA operon mRNA. Instead, we demonstrate that the 39 aa peptide encoded by SR1, SR1P, is responsible for the effect of SR1 on the gapA operon. We show that SR1P binds GapA, thereby stabilizing the gapA operon mRNA by a hitherto unknown mechanism. SR1 is the first dual‐function sRNA found in B. subtilis.

CsrA is a widely conserved, abundant small RNA binding protein that has been found in E. coli and other Gram-negative bacteria where it is involved in the regulation of carbon metabolism, biofilm formation and virulence. CsrA binds to single-stranded GGA motifs around the SD sequence of target mRNAs where it inhibits or activates translation or influences RNA processing. Small RNAs like CsrB or CsrC containing 13–22 GGA motifs can sequester CsrA, thereby abrogating the effect of CsrA on its target mRNAs. In B. subtilis, CsrA has so far only been found to regulate one target, hag mRNA and to be sequestered by a protein (FliW) and not by an sRNA. Here, we employ a combination of in vitro and in vivo methods to investigate the effect of CsrA on the small regulatory RNA SR1 from B. subtilis, its primary target ahrC mRNA and its downstream targets, the rocABC and rocDEF operons. We demonstrate that CsrA can promote the base-pairing interactions between SR1 and ahrC mRNA, a function that has so far only been found for Hfq or ProQ. Abbreviations: aa, amino acid; bp, basepair; nt, nucleotide; PAA, polyacrylamide; SD, Shine Dalgarno.