Glen Weiss

Dr. Glen Weiss

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2016 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDaniel Douglas Von Hoff
Daniel Douglas Von Hoff
MMMonica M. Mita
Monica M. Mita
RRRamesh K. Ramanathan
Ramesh K. Ramanathan
GWGlen Weiss
Glen Weiss
AMAlain C. Mita
Alain C. Mita
JSJasgit C. Sachdev
Jasgit C. Sachdev
Purpose: First-in-human phase I trial to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of BIND-014, a novel, tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted nanoparticle, containing docetaxel. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors received BIND-014 every three weeks (n = 28) or weekly (n = 27), with dose levels ranging from 3.5 to 75 mg/m2 and 15 to 45 mg/m2, respectively. Results: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities. The most common drug-related toxicities (>20% of patients) on either schedule included neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, alopecia, and diarrhea. BIND-014 demonstrated a dose-linear pharmacokinetic profile, distinct from docetaxel, with prolonged persistence of docetaxel-encapsulated circulating nanoparticles. Of the 52 patients evaluable for response, one had a complete response (cervical cancer on the every three week schedule) and five had partial responses (ampullary adenocarcinoma, non–small cell lung, and prostate cancers on the every-three-week schedule, and breast and gastroesophageal cancers on the weekly schedule). Responses were noted in both PSMA-detectable and -undetectable tumors. Conclusions: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with predictable and manageable toxicity and a unique pharmacokinetic profile compared with conventional docetaxel. Clinical activity was noted in multiple tumor types. The recommended phase II dose of BIND-014 is 60 mg/m2 every three weeks or 40 mg/m2 weekly. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3157–63. ©2016 AACR.

1 July 2021 in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAddeo Alfredo
Addeo Alfredo
AFAlex Friedlaender
Alex Friedlaender
GBGiuseppe L. Banna
Giuseppe L. Banna
GWGlen Weiss
Glen Weiss

8 November 2017 in Investigational New Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GWGlen Weiss
Glen Weiss
LBLisa Blaydorn
Lisa Blaydorn
JBJulia Beck
Julia Beck
KBKirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki
Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki
HUHoward Urnovitz
Howard Urnovitz
VKVivek Khemka
Vivek Khemka

5 March 2020 in Microbiome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YHYoshitaro Heshiki
Yoshitaro Heshiki
RVRuben Vazquez-Uribe
Ruben Vazquez-Uribe
JLJin Li
Jin Li
YNYueqiong Ni
Yueqiong Ni
SQScott Quainoo
Scott Quainoo
GPGianni Panagiotou
Gianni Panagiotou
The gut microbiota has the potential to influence the efficacy of cancer therapy. Here, we investigated the contribution of the intestinal microbiome on treatment outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort that included multiple cancer types to identify microbes with a global impact on immune response. Human gut metagenomic analysis revealed that responder patients had significantly higher microbial diversity and different microbiota compositions compared to non-responders. A machine-learning model was developed and validated in an independent cohort to predict treatment outcomes based on gut microbiota composition and functional repertoires of responders and non-responders. Specific species, Bacteroides ovatus and Bacteroides xylanisolvens, were positively correlated with treatment outcomes. Oral gavage of these responder bacteria significantly increased the efficacy of erlotinib and induced the expression of CXCL9 and IFN-γ in a murine lung cancer model. These data suggest a predictable impact of specific constituents of the microbiota on tumor growth and cancer treatment outcomes with implications for both prognosis and therapy.

31 August 2017 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GWGlen Weiss
Glen Weiss
JBJulia Beck
Julia Beck
DBDonald P. Braun
Donald P. Braun
KBKristen Bornemann-Kolatzki
Kristen Bornemann-Kolatzki
HBHeather Barilla
Heather Barilla
ESEkkehard Schütz
Ekkehard Schütz
Purpose: Chromosomal instability is a fundamental property of cancer, which can be quantified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) from plasma/serum–derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA). We hypothesized that cfDNA could be used as a real-time surrogate for imaging analysis of disease status as a function of response to immunotherapy and as a more reliable tool than tumor biomarkers. Experimental Design: Plasma cfDNA sequences from 56 patients with diverse advanced cancers were prospectively collected and analyzed in a single-blind study for copy number variations, expressed as a quantitative chromosomal number instability (CNI) score versus 126 noncancer controls in a training set of 23 and a blinded validation set of 33. Tumor biomarker concentrations and a surrogate marker for T regulatory cells (Tregs) were comparatively analyzed. Results: Elevated CNI scores were observed in 51 of 56 patients prior to therapy. The blinded validation cohort provided an overall prediction accuracy of 83% (25/30) and a positive predictive value of CNI score for progression of 92% (11/12). The combination of CNI score before cycle (Cy) 2 and 3 yielded a correct prediction for progression in all 13 patients. The CNI score also correctly identified cases of pseudo-tumor progression from hyperprogression. Before Cy2 and Cy3, there was no significant correlation for protein tumor markers, total cfDNA, or surrogate Tregs. Conclusions: Chromosomal instability quantification in plasma cfDNA can serve as an early indicator of response to immunotherapy. The method has the potential to reduce health care costs and disease burden for cancer patients following further validation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5074–81. ©2017 AACR.

6 June 2017 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GWGlen Weiss
Glen Weiss
JWJordan Waypa
Jordan Waypa
LBLisa Blaydorn
Lisa Blaydorn
JCJessica Coats
Jessica Coats
KMKayla McGahey
Kayla McGahey
VKVivek Khemka
Vivek Khemka
Pembrolizumab (P) is an anti-PD-1 antibody that blocks the interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T-cells and PD-L1 and PD-L2 on tumour cells. A phase Ib trial of P plus chemotherapy was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy. Patients with advanced, metastatic solid tumours were enrolled onto one of six treatment arms. Pembrolizumab was given: with gemcitabine (G), G+docetaxel (D), G+nab-paclitaxel (NP), G+vinorelbine (V) or irinotecan (I) until progression or toxicity, or with liposomal doxorubicin (LD) for up to 15 cycles, progression or toxicity. Safety monitoring and response assessments were conducted. Forty-nine patients were enrolled and treated. The most common adverse events were transaminitis, cytopenias, rash, diarrhoea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting. Arm 2 was closed due to poor accrual. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined for Arms 1, 3a, 4, 5 and 6. There were eight partial responses across multiple tumour types. Standard dose P can be safely combined with G, G+NP, G+V, I and LD. Efficacy was observed in multiple tumour types and evaluation to determine if response and duration of response are more robust than what would be expected for chemotherapy or immunotherapy alone requires further validation.