Muhammad Usman Azam

Dr. Muhammad Usman Azam

University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Aberdeen City, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Applied Surface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MUMuhammad Umer
Muhammad Umer
MTMuhammad Tahir
Muhammad Tahir
MAMuhammad Usman Azam
Muhammad Usman Azam
MJMohammad Musaab Jaffar
Mohammad Musaab Jaffar

1 August 2019 in Applied Surface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMuhammad Usman Azam
Muhammad Usman Azam
MTMuhammad Tahir
Muhammad Tahir
MUMuhammad Umer
Muhammad Umer
MJMohammad Musaab Jaffar
Mohammad Musaab Jaffar
MNM.G.M. Nawawi
M.G.M. Nawawi

17 October 2024 in ACS Catalysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMuhammad Usman Azam
Muhammad Usman Azam
Auguste FernandesAuguste Fernandes
Auguste Fernandes
MFMaria João Ferreira
Maria João Ferreira
Waheed AfzalWaheed Afzal
Waheed Afzal
IGInês Graça
Inês Graça

1 June 2019 in Applied Clay Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MUMuhammad Umer
Muhammad Umer
MTMuhammad Tahir
Muhammad Tahir
MAMuhammad Usman Azam
Muhammad Usman Azam
BTBeenish Tahir
Beenish Tahir
MJMohammad Musaab Jaffar
Mohammad Musaab Jaffar
HAHajar Alias
Hajar Alias

21 November 2022 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMuhammad Usman Azam
Muhammad Usman Azam
AVAkshay Vete
Akshay Vete
Waheed AfzalWaheed Afzal
Waheed Afzal
Pyrolysis and hydrocracking of plastic waste can produce valuable products with manageable effects on the environment as compared to landfilling and incineration. This research focused on the process simulation and life cycle assessment of the pyrolysis and hydrocracking of high-density polyethylene. Aspen Plus was used as the simulator and the Peng-Robinson thermodynamic model was employed as a fluid package. Additionally, sensitivity analysis was conducted in order to optimize product distribution. Based on the simulation, the hydrocracking process produced value-added fuels, i.e., gasoline and natural gas. In contrast, pyrolysis generated a significant quantity of pyrolysis oil with a high number of cyclo-compounds and char, which are the least important to be utilized as fuels. Moreover, in the later part of the study, life cycle assessment (LCA) was adopted in order to investigate and quantify their impact upon the environment using simulation inventory data, which facilitates finding a sustainable process. Simapro was used as a tool for LCA of the processes and materials used. The results demonstrate that hydrocracking is a better process in terms of environmental impact in 10 out of the 11 impact categories. Overall, the present study proposed a promising comparison based on energy demands, product distribution, and potential environmental impacts, which will help to improve plastic waste management.

1 October 2019 in Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MUMuhammad Umer
Muhammad Umer
MTMuhammad Tahir
Muhammad Tahir
MAMuhammad Usman Azam
Muhammad Usman Azam
STSehar Tasleem
Sehar Tasleem
TATariq Abbas
Tariq Abbas
AMAyyaz Muhammad
Ayyaz Muhammad