Jatupol Srisomboon

Dr. Jatupol Srisomboon


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
STSiriwan Tangjitgamol
Siriwan Tangjitgamol
ETEkkasit Tharavichitkul
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul
CTChokaew Tovanabutra
Chokaew Tovanabutra
KRKanisa Rongsriyam
Kanisa Rongsriyam
TATussawan Asakij
Tussawan Asakij
VLVichan Lorvidhaya
Vichan Lorvidhaya
Tangjitgamol S, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;30(4):e82. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e82

1 May 2005 in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPrapaporn Suprasert
Prapaporn Suprasert
JSJatupol Srisomboon
Jatupol Srisomboon
Kittipat CharoenkwanKittipat Charoenkwan
Kittipat Charoenkwan
SSS. Siriaungul
S. Siriaungul
SKS. Khunamornpong
S. Khunamornpong
VLV. Lorvidhaya
V. Lorvidhaya

1 December 2019 in Clinical Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSiwanon Rattanakanokchai
Siwanon Rattanakanokchai
CKChumnan Kietpeerakool
Chumnan Kietpeerakool
JSJatupol Srisomboon
Jatupol Srisomboon
NJNampet Jampathong
Nampet Jampathong
PPPorjai Pattanittum
Porjai Pattanittum
PLPisake Lumbiganon
Pisake Lumbiganon
Background: With increasing rates of cesarean sections (CS), the number of hysterectomies performed among women with a previous CS is on the rise. Objective: To provide the association between the odds of complications following a hysterectomy performed later in life and a previous CS. Search strategy: A comprehensive search was performed using major electronic databases, ie, MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, from their inception to April 2019. Selection criteria: Analytical studies, irrespective of language or publication status, were included. Data collection and analysis: Outcomes were extracted in duplicate. The methodological quality of the included studies was independently evaluated by two review authors. A three-level meta-analysis was applied for outcomes with dependent effect sizes. Main results: Twenty-six studies were included involving 54,815 women. The odds of the following complications were increased in women with a previous CS: urinary tract injury (pooled unadjusted odds ratio (OR)=3.15, 95% CI=2.01–4.94, 15 studies, 33,902 women, and pooled adjusted OR=2.21, 95% CI=1.46–3.34, 3 studies, 31,038 women), gastrointestinal tract injury (pooled unadjusted OR=1.73, 95% CI=1.19–2.53; 7 studies, 30,050, and pooled adjusted OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.11–3.03, 1 study, 25,354 women), postoperative infections (pooled unadjusted OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.22–1.71, 6 studies, 37,832 women), wound complications (pooled unadjusted OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.94–2.57, 9 studies, 37,559 women), reoperation (pooled unadjusted OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.19–1.78, 2 studies, 9,899 women), and blood transfusion (pooled unadjusted OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.03–1.76, 7 studies, 13,430 women). Conclusion: Previous CS increases risks of various complications following hysterectomy. This information reminds the gynecologists to be aware of the associations between previous CS and potential complications among women undergoing hysterectomy. Prospero registration number: CRD42018085061.

20 July 2020 in Minimally Invasive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChumnan Kietpeerakool
Chumnan Kietpeerakool
SRSiwanon Rattanakanokchai
Siwanon Rattanakanokchai
AYAranya Yantapant
Aranya Yantapant
RRRatchadaporn Roekyindee
Ratchadaporn Roekyindee
SPSongphol Puttasiri
Songphol Puttasiri
JSJatupol Srisomboon
Jatupol Srisomboon
Background. Shoulder pain is a common symptom following laparoscopic surgery. This systematic review was undertaken to assess updated evidence regarding the effectiveness and complications of the pulmonary recruitment maneuver (PRM) for reducing shoulder pain after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Methods. A number of databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating PRM for reducing shoulder pain were searched up to June 2019. Two authors independently selected potentially relevant RCTs, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and compared results. Network meta-analyses were employed to simultaneously compare multiple interventions. Effect measures were presented as pooled mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95 confidence intervals (CI). Results. Of the 44 records that we identified as a result of the search (excluding duplicates), eleven RCTs involving 1111 participants were included. Three studies had an unclear risk of selection bias. PRM with a maximum pressure of 40cm H2O was most likely to result in the lowest shoulder pain intensity at 24 hours (MD 1.91; 95 CI 2.06 to 1.76) while PRM with a maximum pressure of 40cmH2O plus intraperitoneal saline (IPS) appeared to be the most efficient at 48 hours (MD 2.09; 95 CI 2.97 to 1.21). The estimated RRs for analgesia requirement, nausea/vomiting, and cardiopulmonary events were similar across the competing interventions. Conclusion. PRM with 40cm H2O performed either alone or accompanied by IPS is a promising intervention for alleviating shoulder pain within 48 hours following gynecologic laparoscopy.

14 May 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAtita Ruengsaen
Atita Ruengsaen
SSSethawat Sethasathien
Sethawat Sethasathien
CSCharuwan Saeteng
Charuwan Saeteng
Kittipat CharoenkwanKittipat Charoenkwan
Kittipat Charoenkwan
PSPrapaporn Suprasert
Prapaporn Suprasert
TTTheera Tongsong
Theera Tongsong
Objective: To evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with ultra-high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) compared to those with low-risk and high-risk GTN. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for GTN patients treated at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand, between January 1999 and December 2019. Overall and risk-specific survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: During the study period, 160 patients with GTN were identified, including 98 (61.2%) classified as low-risk, 31 (19.4%) as high-risk, and 31 (19.4%) as ultra-high-risk. One patient in the low-risk group and one in the high-risk group underwent hysterectomy without adjuvant chemotherapy due to spontaneous regression of serum β-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin). Additionally, one patient with ultra-high-risk GTN died before receiving chemotherapy. Among the 97 low-risk GTN patients, 80 (82.5%) were treated with either single-agent methotrexate or actinomycin D. Among the 30 high-risk GTN patients, 20 (66.7%) received EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine) as first-line chemotherapy, while 24 (80%) of the 30 ultra-high-risk GTN patients received EMA/CO as first-line treatment. Following first-line chemotherapy and/or salvage treatment, patients with ultra-high-risk GTN had significantly worse outcomes compared with those with low- and high-risk GTN, with remission rates of 63.3%, 96.9%, and 80.0%, respectively (p < 0.01). The five-year overall survival rate for patients with ultra-high-risk GTN was significantly lower than that for patients with low- and high-risk GTN (56% vs. 96% and 80%, respectively; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, significant prognostic factors included antecedent term pregnancy (hazard ratio [HR] = 11.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.56–37.22; p < 0.01) and brain metastasis (HR = 4.61; 95% CI, 1.73–12.28; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Ultra-high-risk GTN accounts for only a small proportion of GTN cases but it is associated with poor survival rate and responsible for the majority of GTN-related deaths. Antecedent term pregnancy and brain metastasis were identified as significant prognostic factors.

1 January 2022 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALArb-aroon Lertkhachonsuk
Arb-aroon Lertkhachonsuk
Kittipat CharoenkwanKittipat Charoenkwan
Kittipat Charoenkwan
SWSarikapan Wilailak
Sarikapan Wilailak
PKPanon Kasemsarn
Panon Kasemsarn
JSJatupol Srisomboon
Jatupol Srisomboon
Lertkhachonsuk AA, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;33:e36. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e36