Pavel Stavrev

Dr. Pavel Stavrev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 June 2008 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TST Stanescu
T Stanescu
HJH-S Jans
H-S Jans
NPN Pervez
N Pervez
PSPavel Stavrev
Pavel Stavrev
BFB. Gino Fallone
B. Gino Fallone
The aim of this study is to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment planning procedure for intracranial lesions. The method relies on (a) distortion correction of raw magnetic resonance (MR) images by using an adaptive thresholding and iterative technique, (b) autosegmentation of head structures relevant to dosimetric calculations (scalp, bone and brain) using an atlas-based software and (c) conversion of MR images into computed tomography (CT)-like images by assigning bulk CT values to organ contours and dose calculations performed in Eclipse (Philips Medical Systems). Standard CT + MRI-based and MRI-only plans were compared by means of isodose distributions, dose volume histograms and several dosimetric parameters. The plans were also ranked by using a tumor control probability (TCP)-based technique for heterogeneous irradiation, which is independent of radiobiological parameters. For our 3 T Intera MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems), we determined that the total maximum image distortion corresponding to a typical brain study was about 4 mm. The CT + MRI and MRI-only plans were found to be in good agreement for all patients investigated. Following our clinical criteria, the TCP-based ranking tool shows no significant difference between the two types of plans. This indicates that the proposed MRI-based treatment planning procedure is suitable for the radiotherapy of intracranial lesions.

17 April 2001 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPavel Stavrev
Pavel Stavrev
NSN Stavreva
N Stavreva
ANA Niemierko
A Niemierko
MGM Goitein
M Goitein
This work investigates the existing biological models describing the response of tumours and normal tissues to radiation, with the purpose of developing a general biological model of the response of tissue to radiation. Two different types of normal tissue behaviour have been postulated with respect to its response to radiation, namely critical element and critical volume behaviour. Based on the idea that an organ is composed of functional subunits, models have been developed describing these behaviours. However, these models describe the response of an individual, a particular patient or experimental animal, while the clinically or experimentally observed quantity is the population response. There is a need to extend the models to address the population response, based on the ideas we have about the individual response. We have attempted here to summarize and unify the existing individual models. Finally, the population models are investigated by fitting to pseudoexperimental sets of data and comparing them with each other in terms of goodness-of-fit and in terms of their power to recover the values of the population parameters.

1 October 2015 in British Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRuggero Ruggieri
Ruggero Ruggieri
SNStefania Naccarato
Stefania Naccarato
PSPavel Stavrev
Pavel Stavrev
NSNadejda Stavreva
Nadejda Stavreva
SFSergio Fersino
Sergio Fersino
Filippo AlongiFilippo Alongi
Filippo Alongi
Objective:In volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) becomes challenging when the sparing of rectum, bladder and urethra is strictly pursued. Our current 35-Gy-in-five-fraction plans only assure 33.2 Gy to ≥95% PTV (V33.2PTV ≥ 95%). Looking for an improved V33.2PTV, increased near-maximum target dose (D2%) and prostate–rectum spacer insertion were tested.Methods:For 11 patients, two VMAT plans, with D2% ≤ 37.5 Gy (Hom) or D2% ≤ 40.2 Gy (Het), on each of two CT studies, before or after spacer insertion, were computed. All plans assured V33.2PTV ≥95%, and <1 cm3 of rectum, bladder and urethra receiving ≥35 Gy. By hypothesis testing, several dose–volume metrics for target coverage and rectal sparing were compared across the four groups of plans. The impact of spacer insertion on the fractions of rectum receiving more than 18, 28 and 32 Gy (VXr) was further tested by linear correlation analysis.Results:By hypothe...

1 December 2020 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRuggero Ruggieri
Ruggero Ruggieri
MRMichele Rigo
Michele Rigo
SNStefania Naccarato
Stefania Naccarato
DGDavide Gurrera
Davide Gurrera
VFVanessa Figlia
Vanessa Figlia
FAFilippo Alongi
Filippo Alongi

10 April 2003 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSN. A. Stavreva
N. A. Stavreva
PSPavel Stavrev
Pavel Stavrev
BWB. Warkentin
B. Warkentin
BFB. G. Fallone
B. G. Fallone

1 December 2017 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRuggero Ruggieri
Ruggero Ruggieri
PSPavel Stavrev
Pavel Stavrev
SNStefania Naccarato
Stefania Naccarato
NSNadejda Stavreva
Nadejda Stavreva
Filippo AlongiFilippo Alongi
Filippo Alongi
ANAlan E. Nahum
Alan E. Nahum