Purpose: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous malignancy, which has demonstrated sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Here, we perform the largest genomics study in MCC to date to characterize the molecular landscape and evaluate for clinical and molecular correlates to immune checkpoint inhibitor response. Experimental Design: Comprehensive molecular profiling was performed on 317 tumors from patients with MCC, including the evaluation of oncogenic mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), mutational signatures, and the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). For a subset of 57 patients, a retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate for clinical and molecular correlates to immune checkpoint inhibitor response and disease survival. Results: Genomic analyses revealed a bimodal distribution in TMB, with 2 molecularly distinct subgroups. Ninety-four percent (n = 110) of TMB-high specimens exhibited an ultraviolet light (UV) mutational signature. MCPyV genomic DNA sequences were not identified in any TMB-high cases (0/117), but were in 63% (110/175) of TMB-low cases. For 36 evaluable patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, the overall response rate was 44% and response correlated with survival at time of review (100% vs. 20%, P < 0.001). Response rate was 50% in TMB-high/UV-driven and 41% in TMB-low/MCPyV-positive tumors (P = 0.63). Response rate was significantly correlated with line of therapy: 75% in first-line, 39% in second-line, and 18% in third-line or beyond (P = 0.0066). PD-1, but not PD-L1, expression was associated with immunotherapy response (77% vs. 21%, P = 0.00598, for PD-1 positive and negative, respectively). Conclusions: We provide a comprehensive genomic landscape of MCC and demonstrate clinicogenomic associates of immunotherapy response.

Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is associated with development of acute hemolytic anemia in the setting of oxidative stress, which can be caused by medication exposure. Regulatory agencies worldwide warn against the use of certain medications in persons with G6PD deficiency, but in many cases, this information is conflicting, and the clinical evidence is sparse. This guideline provides information on using G6PD genotype as part of the diagnosis of G6PD deficiency and classifies medications that have been previously implicated as unsafe in individuals with G6PD deficiency by one or more sources. We classify these medications as high, medium, or low to no risk based on a systematic review of the published evidence of the gene–drug associations and regulatory warnings. In patients with G6PD deficiency, high‐risk medications should be avoided, medium‐risk medications should be used with caution, and low‐to‐no risk medications can be used with standard precautions, without regard to G6PD phenotype. This new document replaces the prior Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for rasburicase therapy in the context of G6PD genotype (updates at: www.cpicpgx.org).

To determine the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and cost of UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan. In this prospective, multicentre, non-randomised study, patients intended for treatment with irinotecan were pre-therapeutically genotyped for UGT1A1∗28 and UGT1A1∗93. Homozygous variant carriers (UGT1A1 poor metabolisers; PMs) received an initial 30% dose reduction. The primary endpoint was incidence of febrile neutropenia in the first two cycles of treatment. Toxicity in UGT1A1 PMs was compared to a historical cohort of UGT1A1 PMs treated with full dose therapy, and to UGT1A1 non-PMs treated with full dose therapy in the current study. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, feasibility, and costs. Of the 350 evaluable patients, 31 (8.9%) patients were UGT1A1 PM and received a median 30% dose reduction. The incidence of febrile neutropenia in this group was 6.5% compared to 24% in historical UGT1A1 PMs (P = 0.04) and was comparable to the incidence in UGT1A1 non-PMs treated with full dose therapy. Systemic exposure of SN-38 of reduced dosing in UGT1A1 PMs was still slightly higher compared to a standard-dosed irinotecan patient cohort (difference: +32%). Cost analysis showed that genotype-guided dosing was cost-saving with a cost reduction of €183 per patient. UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing significantly reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in UGT1A1 PM patients treated with irinotecan, results in a therapeutically effective systemic drug exposure, and is cost-saving. Therefore, UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan should be considered standard of care in order to improve individual patient safety.

Arshiya Mariam, BS, and colleagues report the findings of a large meta-analysis assessing the ability of various biomarkers to predict responses to immune checkpoint inhibition.