The efficacy and durability of actual treatments (open, endovascular and hybrid) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair are not yet completely defined. Open surgical repair using a multi-adjunct (ADJ) approach has been the standard of care for many years and may still be an effective treatment option. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of open TAAA repair since the introduction of the available ADJ. From 1994 to 2014, 542 consecutive patients underwent open TAAA repair in our institution, routinely receiving aortic distal perfusion and the other ADJ (either for visceral and spinal cord protection). The aetiology of TAAA was identified to be degenerative in 325 (60%) patients and chronic post-dissection in 160 (29.5%) patients. Other causes such as connective tissue disorders, vasculitis and infective aneurysms were less represented (10.5%). Extensive type I and II repair was required in 128 (23.6%) and 285 (52.6%) patients, respectively. All patients were followed up at 3 and 6 months after surgery and yearly thereafter using computed tomography angiogram. The overall 30-day mortality and paraplegia rates were 8.5 and 4.2%, respectively. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.07 per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.13], female gender (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.27–4.99), urgency (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.12–6.20) and emergency (OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.00–11.50) emerged as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Follow-up was 100% complete (mean 6.32 years). Overall 1-, 5- and 10-year survival was 85.9 ± 1.5, 74.2 ± 2.0 and 61.6 ± 2.5%, respectively. The extent of surgical repair did not significantly influence late hospital death ( P = 0.56). For patients surviving the first 30 days, a degenerative aneurysm aetiology negatively impaired long-term survival compared with the other diseases [hazard ratio = 1.66; 95% CI (1.13–2.44)]. Five- and 10-year freedom from reoperation was 86.3 ± 1.8 and 80.7 ± 2.3%, respectively, and 8.5% of patients required aortic reinterventions. In elective cases, open TAAA repair has to be considered an effective option associated with low necessity of reoperation at follow-up. The extent of aortic resection did not affect long-term mortality. Conversely, survival was mainly determined by patient age and preoperative condition.

Treating complex aortic arch disease with proximal and distal aortic segment involvement is challenging. In recent years, different surgical and endovascular techniques have been applied in a single or multiple-stage approach with the aim to cure and simplify these conditions. The first procedure available for this purpose was the conventional elephant trunk technique. Its recent evolution is the frozen elephant trunk, which treats the descending thoracic aorta using the antegrade release of a self-expandable stent graft. In the following review article, we analyse the advantages and drawbacks of both techniques from clinical and practical perspectives.

Surgical management of the aortic root in type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is controversial. This study compares short- and long-term outcomes of root replacement (RR) versus conservative root management (CR). Between 1999 and 2014, 296 patients with TAAAD were treated in our department. The mean age was 63.7 years. Of the total, 69% were male. Ten patients (3%) presented with Marfan syndrome or bicuspid aortic valve. RR was performed in 119 (40%) patients, whereas CR in 177 (60%). Pre- and intraoperative data were stratified according to root management, and treatment bias was addressed by propensity-score (PS) analysis. Independent predictors of hospital and long-term mortality and proximal aortic reoperation were identified using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models. Using PS analysis, we obtain two groups of 82 patients. The matched cohort hospital mortality rate was 21% in the CR group and 26% in the RR group ( P = 0.45). The unadjusted comparison showed no statistical difference in early and long-term mortality between the groups. This result was confirmed after standard logistic regression and propensity-adjusted logistic regression. Freedom from proximal aortic reintervention was higher in the RR group (at 7 years RR: 96 ± 3% vs CR: 80 ± 6%, log-rank P = 0.02) and remained high in the matched cohort of patients (at 7 years RR: 98 ± 2 vs CR: 86 ± 6, log-rank P = 0.06). Conservative and aggressive root management in acute aortic dissection provided similar results for early and late mortality. Nevertheless, a more extensive root intervention appeared to be protective against aortic reintervention.