Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is known to be a biomarker for systemic inflammatory reactions. In the present study, we sought to measure the predictive value of serum CRP level for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line ipilimumab and nivolumab using our real-world clinical dataset including non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). The clinical record of patients who underwent the first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab treatment for mRCC including ccRCC and nccRCC from 2018 to 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients were diagnosed with either intermediate or poor-risk group defined by IMCD (international metastatic RCC database consortium). In total, 74 patients were involved. The median age was 68 years and 24 (32.4%) patients deceased during the follow-up. Forty-five (61%) and 29 (39%) patients were classified into intermediate and poor-risk groups. The one-year overall survival (OS) rate and objective response rate were 65% and 41% for all 74 mRCC patients, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve identified 1.0 mg/dL of serum CRP level as an ideal cut-off for predicting overall survival (OS). Serum CRP > 1.0 mg/dL and nccRCC were the independent predictors for OS in 74 mRCC patients. OS for patients with CRP > 1 mg/dL was significantly shorter than those with CRP < 1 mg/dL in both ccRCC (58 patient: p = 0.009) and nccRCC (16 patients: p = 0.008). The present study indicated that serum CRP level is a prognostic indicator for OS in both ccRCC and nccRCC patients treated with the first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab treatment.

Background: There is emerging evidence that radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) is highly correlated with overall survival (OS), potentially serving as an indicator of treatment outcome for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The objective of this study is to assess rPFS and prostate specific antigen (PSA) response in sequential treatment using androgen signaling inhibitors (ASIs) including abiraterone and enzalutamide in newly diagnosed CRPC. Methods: Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias by confounding factors between first-line ASIs. The primary endpoints of the study included rPFS, time to PSA progression (TTPP), and PSA response. Results: A paired-matched group of 184 patients were identified. From the initiation of first-line ASIs, there was no significant difference in rPFS, TTPP, and PSA response between treatment arms. From the initiation of second-line ASIs, enzalutamide following abiraterone consistently exhibited longer rPFS (median: 7 and 15 months, p = 0.04), TTPP, and better PSA response compared to the reverse, whereas OS did not reach significance (median: 14 and 23 months, p = 0.35). Conclusion: Although the effect of ASIs as the first line was similar, the extent of cross-resistance might differ towards less resistance in enzalutamide following abiraterone than the reverse.

Introduction Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is emerging as an effective treatment oncologically and functionally for clinically localized renal tumors. However, RAPN in high‐complexity tumors with a Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical score ≥10 remains challenging. In this study, the feasibility of RAPN for high‐complexity tumors was assessed. Methods The study cohort consisted of 177 cases with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma who had undergone RAPN at our hospital from July 2010 to February 2018. They were assessed for perioperative parameters and trifecta achievement (ie, negative surgical margins, warm ischemia time <25 minutes, and no complications). Results Among the 177 cases who had undergone RAPN, 60 had high‐complexity tumors, and 117 had non‐high‐complexity (ie, intermediate‐ or low‐complexity) tumors. There were no significant differences in the operative and console times between the cohorts, but estimated intraoperative blood loss was much lower in the non‐high‐complexity group. Although the average warm ischemia time was less than 25 minutes in both groups, it was significantly shorter in the non‐high‐complexity group. Trifecta achievement rates significantly differed between the high‐ and non‐high‐complexity groups (68.3% vs 86.3%). Comparisons of four operative parameters (ie, BMI, tumor size, endophytic properties, and hilar tumor) using univariate analysis in the 60 high‐complexity tumor cases showed that BMI and tumor size were independent factors (P = 0.05 and 0.018, respectively). In multivariate analysis, tumor size was the only factor directly associated with trifecta achievement (P = 0.029). Conclusion The trifecta achievement rate was significantly lower in the high‐complexity group. Only tumor size affected trifecta achievement during RAPN in cases with high‐complexity tumors (Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical score ≥10).

Pembrolizumab has emerged as the new standard of care in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), whereas the optimal risk stratification to predict survival outcomes is still controversial. We examined a risk model for overall survival (OS) in mUC treated with pembrolizumab using our multi-institutional dataset (212 patients). The median age was 72 years old. Median OS from the initiation of pembrolizumab treatment was 11.7 months. The objective response rate (ORR) was 26.4%. On multivariate analysis, multiple metastatic sites and an NLR > 3.50 at the initiation of pembrolizumab treatment were identified as independent predictors for OS. We next developed a risk model using those two predictors. Patients without any factors were assigned to the favorable-risk group (26.5%). Patients with either factor and both factors were assigned to the intermediate-risk group (44.3%), and poor-risk group (29.2%), respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves showed clear discrimination of OS among the risk groups (p < 0.001). The ORR in each group was 35.7% in the favorable-risk group, 27.7% in the intermediate-risk group, and 17.7% in the poor-risk group. Given that the model can be concisely determined at the initiation of pembrolizumab treatment, physicians may be encouraged to consider the risk group for daily practice.