Intravenous β‐lactam antibiotics remain a cornerstone in the management of bacterial infections due to their broad spectrum of activity and excellent tolerability. β‐lactams are well established to display time‐dependent bactericidal activity, where reductions in bacterial burden are directly associated with the time that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen during the dosing interval. In an effort to take advantage of these bactericidal characteristics, prolonged (extended and continuous) infusions (PIs) can be applied during the administration of intravenous β‐lactams to increase time above the MIC. PI dosing regimens have been implemented worldwide, but implementation is inconsistent. We report consensus therapeutic recommendations for the use of PI β‐lactams developed by an expert international panel with representation from clinical pharmacy and medicine. This consensus guideline provides recommendations regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, therapeutic drug‐monitoring considerations, and the use of PI β‐lactam therapy in the following patient populations: severely ill and nonseverely ill adult patients, pediatric patients, and obese patients. These recommendations provide the first consensus guidance for the use of β‐lactam therapy administered as PIs and have been reviewed and endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP).

Background: In the ICU, early and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is important to lower infection-related mortality. Objectives: Assess whether achieving early β-lactam free concentration above the MIC 100% of the time (fT>MIC) is associated with positive outcomes in the ICU. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in ICU patients admitted to UF Health Shands Hospital between 2016 and 2018. Adult patients who received β-lactam therapy and had drug concentration measured were included. Data collected included demographics, β-lactam regimens and concentrations, sources of infection, cultures and susceptibilities, mortality, length of stay, resistance acquisition for 30 days and clinical outcome at end of therapy. Multiple regression and time-to-event (TTE) analyses were performed. Results: Two-hundred and six patients were included. Clinical cure occurred in 71%, microbial eradication occurred in 58% and new resistance to the β-lactam received developed in 8% of patients. Hospital and 30 day mortalities were 17% and 14%, respectively. fT>MIC and fT>4×MIC were associated with clinical cure (P = 0.0303), microbial eradication (P = 0.0476) and suppression of resistance (P = 0.0043). Delay in measuring β-lactam concentration was associated with clinical failure (P = 0.0072), longer ICU stay (P < 0.0001) and higher mortality (P = 0.0387). In the TTE analysis, patients with 100% fT>MIC had a significantly shorter ICU stay (P = 0.0297). Patients who had clinical cure and microbial eradication had drug concentrations measured earlier (P = 0.0025 and 0.0254, respectively). Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of early measurement of β-lactam concentration and confirms the association between fT>MIC and clinical cure, microbial eradication and emergence of resistance.

Introduction: One-third of the world’s population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb.). Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can progress to tuberculosis disease, the leading cause of death by infection. Rifamycin antibiotics, like rifampin and rifapentine, have unique sterilizing activity against M.tb. What are the advantages of each for LTBI or tuberculosis treatment? Areas covered: We review studies assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), drug interaction risk, safety, and efficacy of rifampin and rifapentine and provide basis for comparing them. Expert commentary: Rifampin has shorter half-life, higher MIC against M.tb, lower protein binding, and better distribution into cavitary contents than rifapentine. Drug interactions for the two drugs maybe similar in magnitude. For LTBI, rifapentine is effective as convenient, once-weekly, 12-week course of treatment. Rifampin is also effective for LTBI, but must be given daily for four months, therefore, drug interactions are more problematic. For drug-sensitive tuberculosis disease, rifampin remains the standard of care. Safety profile of rifampin is better-described; adverse events differ somewhat for the two drugs. The registered once-weekly rifapentine regimen is inadequate, but higher doses of either drugs may shorten the treatment duration required for effective management of TB. Results of clinical trials evaluating high-dose rifamycin regimens are eagerly awaited.

The 4-drug regimen of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol is an inexpensive, reliable option for treating patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB). Its efficacy could be further improved by determining the free drug concentrations in plasma, knowing that only the unbound drug can freely penetrate to the tissues. Using an ultrafiltration technique, we determined the protein binding (PB) extent and variability of the first-line anti-TB drugs when given simultaneously to TB patients, representing a real-life case scenario. We used clinical samples routinely received by our laboratory. Plasma proteins were also measured. A protein-free medium was used to determine the nonspecific binding. Plasma samples from 22 patients were included, of which plasma proteins were measured for 18 patients. The median PB was determined for rifampin (88%; range, 72 to 91%), isoniazid (14%; range, 0 to 34%), pyrazinamide (1%; range, 0 to 7%), and ethambutol (12%; range, 4 to 24%). Plasma proteins were not found to be significant predictors for the PB of first-line anti-TB drugs. Rifampin PB was positively correlated with its plasma concentration ( P value = 0.0051). Conversely, isoniazid PB was negatively correlated with its plasma concentration ( P value = 0.0417). Age was found to have a significant effect on isoniazid PB ( P value = 0.0376). No correlations were observed in pyrazinamide or ethambutol. In conclusion, we have determined variable PB of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol in patient plasma samples, with median values of 88, 14, 1, and 12%, respectively. In this small study, PB of rifampin and that of isoniazid are dependent on their plasma concentrations.

The prolonged treatment duration for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) makes linezolid dosing difficult because of adverse effects associated with long-term use. We sought to find the optimal dosing regimen for linezolid across different MIC values. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from TB patients were included from Brazil, Georgia, and two U.S. sites. Population PK modeling and simulation were performed. We used an f AUC (area under the unbound drug concentration-time curve)/MIC ratio of >119 as the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target and minimum (trough) concentrations of drug ( C _min s) of 2 and 7 mg/liter as thresholds for toxicity.