Chih-Ping Lin

Chih-Ping Lin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2003 in Soil Science Society of America Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChih-Ping Lin
Chih-Ping Lin

1 July 2008 in Soil Science Society of America Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChih-Ping Lin
Chih-Ping Lin
CCC.-C. Chung
C.-C. Chung
Johan Alexander HuismanJohan Alexander Huisman
Johan Alexander Huisman
STS.-H. Tang
S.-H. Tang

1 August 2009 in Vadose Zone Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCC.-C. Chung
C.-C. Chung
CLChih-Ping Lin
Chih-Ping Lin

1 May 2003 in Soil Science Society of America Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChih-Ping Lin
Chih-Ping Lin

30 June 2007 in Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChih-Ping Lin
Chih-Ping Lin
CLChun-Hung Lin
Chun-Hung Lin

24 July 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YHYin-Chun Hung
Yin-Chun Hung
CLChih-Ping Lin
Chih-Ping Lin
CLChin-Tan Lee
Chin-Tan Lee
KWKowei Weng
Kowei Weng
Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is one of the most widely used geophysical methods in geological, hydrogeological, and geo-environmental investigations. Although 3D ERT is now available, 2D ERT remains state-of-the-practice due to its simplicity in fieldwork and lower space requirements. 2D ERT assumes that the ground condition is perpendicular to the survey line and outside the survey line is homogeneous. This assumption can often be violated in conditions such as geologic strikes not perpendicular to the survey line and topographic changes or buried objects near the survey line. Possible errors or artifacts in the 2D resistivity tomogram arising from violating the 2D assumption are often overlooked. This study aimed to numerically investigate the boundary effects on 2D ERT under various simplified conditions. Potential factors including resistivity contrast, depth and size of buried objects, and electrode spacing were considered for the parametric studies. The results revealed that offline geologic features may project onto the 2D tomogram to some extent, depending on the aforementioned factors. The mechanism and implications of boundary effects can be drawn from these parametric studies.