Anne Wein

Dr. Anne Wein


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008
Verified
Report
Closed access
LJLucile M. Jones
Lucile M. Jones
RBRichard Bernknopf
Richard Bernknopf
DCDale Cox
Dale Cox
JGJames Goltz
James Goltz
KHKenneth Hudnut
Kenneth Hudnut
AWAnne Wein
Anne Wein

1 January 2011
Verified
Report
Open access
KPKeith Porter
Keith Porter
AWAnne Wein
Anne Wein
CACharles Alpers
Charles Alpers
ABAllan Baez
Allan Baez
PBPatrick Barnard
Patrick Barnard
LJLucile Jones
Lucile Jones

30 November 2015 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AWAnne Wein
Anne Wein
SPSally Potter
Sally Potter
SJSarb Johal
Sarb Johal
EHEmma Hudson-Doyle
Emma Hudson-Doyle
JBJulia Becker
Julia Becker
After a large earthquake, geoscience agencies deliver information to public audiences about earthquakes that have recently occurred and aftershock forecasts about what might happen. We conducted focus groups and interviews about geoscience communications during the 2010–2012 earthquake sequence in Christchurch, New Zealand. Recorded experiences contain information about the public’s appetite for scientific earthquake and aftershock information, psychological and psychosocial states that affect communications, increased demands for geoscientists’ time and expertise, and multiple communication roles and responsibilities during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Results of a preliminary analysis reveal that public consumption of geoscience information changes throughout the sequence and differs with respect to ways of coping.

1 January 2010
Verified
Report
Closed access
BBBrian Bergamaschi
Brian Bergamaschi
RBRichard Bernknopf
Richard Bernknopf
DCDavid Clow
David Clow
DDDennis Dye
Dennis Dye
SFStephen Faulkner
Stephen Faulkner
Zhiliang ZhuZhiliang Zhu
Zhiliang Zhu

1 January 2017
Verified
Report
Open access
PDF file
KJKaren E. Jenni
Karen E. Jenni
MGMartin B. Goldhaber
Martin B. Goldhaber
JBJulio L. Betancourt
Julio L. Betancourt
JBJill S. Baron
Jill S. Baron
SBSky Bristol
Sky Bristol
CZChristian E. Zimmerman
Christian E. Zimmerman
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has a long history of advancing the traditional Earth science disciplines and identifying opportunities to integrate USGS science across disciplines to address complex societal problems. The USGS science strategy for 2007–2017 laid out key challenges in disciplinary and interdisciplinary arenas, culminating in a call for increased focus on a number of crosscutting science directions. Ten years on, to further the goal of integrated science and at the request of the Executive Leadership Team (ELT), a workshop with three dozen invited scientists spanning different disciplines and career stages in the Bureau convened on February 7–10, 2017, at the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis in Fort Collins, Colorado.The workshop focused on identifying “grand challenges” for integrated USGS science. Individual participants identified nearly 70 potential grand challenges before the workshop and through workshop discussions. After discussion, four overarching grand challenges emerged:Natural resource security,Societal risk from existing and emerging threats,Smart infrastructure development, andAnticipatory science for changing landscapes.Participants also identified a “comprehensive science challenge” that highlights the development of integrative science, data, models, and tools—all interacting in a modular framework—that can be used to address these and other future grand challenges:Earth Monitoring, Analyses, and Projections (EarthMAP)EarthMAP is our long-term vision for an integrated scientific framework that spans traditional scientific boundaries and disciplines, and integrates the full portfolio of USGS science: research, monitoring, assessment, analysis, and information delivery.The Department of Interior, and the Nation in general, have a vast array of information needs. The USGS meets these needs by having a broadly trained and agile scientific workforce. Encouraging and supporting cross-discipline engagement would position the USGS to tackle complex and multifaceted scientific and societal challenges in the 21st Century.

1 January 2018
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
KHKenneth Hudnut
Kenneth Hudnut
AWAnne Wein
Anne Wein
DCDale A. Cox
Dale A. Cox
KPKeith A. Porter
Keith A. Porter
LJLaurie A. Johnson
Laurie A. Johnson
DLDrew LaPointe
Drew LaPointe
The HayWired earthquake scenario, led by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), anticipates the impacts of a hypothetical magnitude-7.0 earthquake on the Hayward Fault. The fault is along the east side of California’s San Francisco Bay and is among the most active and dangerous in the United States, because it runs through a densely urbanized and interconnected region. One way to learn about a large earthquake without experiencing it is to conduct a scientifically realistic scenario. The USGS and its partners in the HayWired Coalition and the HayWired Campaign are working to energize residents and businesses to engage in ongoing and new efforts to prepare the region for such a future earthquake.