By using the validated numerical method to simulate the annular shrouded stator with the inter-stage seal cavity, the stator aerodynamic performance related to the cavity leakage flow was examined. The current study also indicated the interactions between the leakage flow and the mainstream. Discussions on the developments of secondary flow movement and hub corner separation were conducted, and the performances at different incoming boundary layer shapes were assessed using both the total pressure loss coefficient and the entropy-based loss coefficient. The results indicate that the cavity leakage flow creates a new vortex close to the leading edge of blade and is crucial to the passage vortex development and the concentrated shedding vortex size. At the same time, the cavity leakage flow weakens the transverse deflection of flow near the end wall and strengthens the three-dimensional flow effect. The two loss coefficients for the shrouded stator with seal cavity change little by thickening the boundary layer. The proper boundary layer skew as well as the interacted cavity leakage flow have stronger resistance to the deflection of the passage vortex and the transverse pressure gradient.

Numerical simulations of a shrouded stator cascade with an inter-stage cavity were conducted using validated numerical methods to investigate the impact of different labyrinth seal structures and positions on the aerodynamic performance of the stator cascade. The study discussed the development trends of secondary flow motion and corner separation within the cascade under different labyrinth seal structures, evaluated the stator performance using total pressure loss coefficient and entropy-based loss coefficient, and revealed the interaction between cavity leakage flow and mainstream flow. The results indicate that individually changing the labyrinth seal structure or position has a negligible impact on stator performance, but simultaneously altering both the structure and position of the labyrinth seal can effectively reduce stator losses. The structure case 1-position case 2 labyrinth seal structure can reduce total pressure loss by 6.25%, while structure case 4-position case 4 reduces entropy increase loss coefficient by 7.67%. Additionally, it was found that changing the labyrinth seal structure and position can increase the circumferential velocity and momentum of cavity leakage flow at the cavity outlet, enhance the resistance of cavity leakage flow to circumferential secondary flow within the stator passage, and reduce stator losses. Altering the structure and position of the labyrinth seal effectively reduces the cavity leakage vortex at the leading edge of the cascade during the mixing process of cavity leakage flow with the mainstream, causing the passage vortex to move rearward axially.