This study aimed to investigate the adipokine and cytokine profiles of adipocytes from epicardial and subcutaneous adipose tissues in interconnection with the visceral adipose tissue area and the biochemical and clinical characteristics of patients with coronary artery disease. We assessed 84 patients with coronary artery disease (65 men, 19 women) and divided them into two groups based on the presence of visceral obesity. We sampled epicardial and subcutaneous adipose tissues from the patients with visceral obesity. We then cultured the adipocytes and evaluated their adipokine profiles and pro-inflammatory activity. Results show that the mRNA expression of adiponectin in cultures of epicardial adipocytes from patients with and without visceral obesity was lower than that in subcutaneous adipocytes. Moreover, adiponectin mRNA expression in cultures of subcutaneous and epicardial adipocytes from patients with visceral obesity was lower than that in patients without obesity. For leptin, the reverse pattern was observed, with expression higher in cultures of epicardial adipocytes than in subcutaneous adipocytes and higher in epicardial adipocytes from patients with visceral obesity than in those from subjects without visceral obesity. In addition, in epicardial adipocytes, increased expression of proinflammatory cytokine genes (IL6, TNF) was observed compared with that in subcutaneous adipocytes. In contrast, expression of IL10 was higher in cultures of subcutaneous adipocytes than in epicardial adipocytes. The epicardial adipose tissue area was associated with the presence of higher levels of leptin and TNF-α within adipocytes and serum, increased lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Coronary artery disease, in the context of the status of epicardial adipocytes, can be characterized as “metabolic inflammation,” suggesting the direct involvement of adipocytes in pathogenesis through the development of adipokine imbalances and activation of proinflammatory processes.

Adipose tissue (AT) is an endocrine and paracrine organ that synthesizes biologically active adipocytokines, which affect inflammation, fibrosis, and atherogenesis. Epicardial and perivascular fat depots are of great interest to researchers, owing to their potential effects on the myocardium and blood vessels. The aim of the study was to assess the expression and secretion of adipocytokine genes in the AT of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and patients with aortic or mitral valve replacement. This study included 84 patients with CAD and 50 patients with aortic or mitral valve replacement. Adipocytes were isolated from subcutaneous, epicardial (EAT), and perivascular AT (PVAT), and were cultured for 24 h. EAT exhibited the lowest level of adiponectin gene expression and secretion, regardless of nosology, and high expression levels of the leptin gene and interleukin-6 (IL-6). However, EAT adipocytes in patients with CAD were characterized by more pronounced changes in comparison with the group with heart defects. High leptin and IL-6 levels resulted in increased pro-inflammatory activity, as observed in both EAT and PVAT adipocytes, especially in individuals with CAD. Therefore, our results revealed the pathogenetic significance of alterations in the adipokine and cytokine status of adipocytes of EAT and PVAT in patients with CAD.

Calcium phosphate bions (CPBs) are formed under blood supersaturation with calcium and phosphate owing to the mineral chaperone fetuin-A and representing mineralo-organic particles consisting of bioapatite and multiple serum proteins. While protecting the arteries from a rapid medial calcification, CPBs cause endothelial injury and aggravate intimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured rat aortas. Here, we asked whether CPBs induce intimal hyperplasia in intact rat arteries in the absence of cardiovascular risk factors. Normolipidemic Wistar rats were subjected to regular (once/thrice per week over 5 weeks) tail vein injections of either spherical (CPB-S) or needle-shaped CPBs (CPB-N), magnesium phosphate bions (MPBs), or physiological saline (n = 5 per group). Neointima was revealed in 3/10 and 4/10 rats which received CPB-S or CPB-N, respectively, regardless of the injection regimen or blood flow pattern in the aortic segments. In contrast, none of the rats treated with MPBs or physiological saline had intimal hyperplasia. The animals also did not display signs of liver or spleen injury as well as extraskeletal calcium deposits. Serum alanine/aspartate transaminases, interleukin-1β, MCP-1/CCL2, C-reactive protein, and ceruloplasmin levels did not differ among the groups. Hence, CPBs may provoke intimal hyperplasia via direct endothelial injury regardless of their shape or type of blood flow.

Lung cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer. The aim of this study was to validate chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes of lung cancer patients living in a region with high air pollution and increased background radon levels as a biomarker of cancer risk. A total of 417 lung cancer patients and 468 control participants were analysed using a chromosome aberration assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes. The results showed that chromatid-type aberrations (2.26±1.58 vs. 1.60±1.58) and chromosome-type aberrations (CSAs) (0.96±1.36 vs. 0.42±0.70) in lung cancer patients were increased significantly in comparison with the controls. The most significant two-fold increase was detected for CSAs (nonsmoking patients: 0.84±1.54 vs. 0.41±0.73%, smoking patients: 0.99±1.31 vs. 0.44±0.67%). The frequency of dicentric and ring chromosomes, double minutes and rogue cells was significantly higher (P=0.002, 0.00002, 0.01, 0.0007) in the lung cancer patients. As both analysed groups lived in the same environment, our results show that increased radon levels were not the only source for the detected genome damage. Using binomial logistic regression, the estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals adjusted for the main confounders (smoking, occupational exposure, age) were 1.31 (1.20–1.40) for chromatid-type aberrations, 1.28 (1.17–1.33), and 1.68 (1.49–1.88) for CSAs. It may be suggested that lung cancer patients show a significant increase in genome damage that may be caused by an interplay between exposure and individual low capacity of DNA repair, leading to genome instability.