Background: Cirrhosis is the primary risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and gastrointestinal bleeding (GI). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of daily aspirin on HCC occurrence, overall survival, and GI bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Methods: A total of 35,898 eligible cases were enrolled for analyses from an initial 40,603 cirrhotic patients without tumor history. Patients continuously treated with aspirin for at least 84 days were in the therapy group, whereas those without treatment were controls. A 1:2 propensity score matching by age, sex, comorbidities, drugs, and significant clinical laboratory tests with covariate assessment was used. Results: Multivariable regression analyses revealed that daily aspirin use was independently associated with a reduced risk of HCC (three-year HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37–0.87; p = 0.0091; five-year HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.88; p = 0.0072) inversely correlated with the treatment duration [3–12 months: HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.58–1.34); 12–36 months: HR 0.56 (0.31–0.99); and ≥ 36 months: HR 0.37 (0.18–0.76)]. Overall mortality rates were significantly lower among aspirin users compared with untreated controls [three-year HR 0.43 (0.33–0.57); five-year HR 0.51 (0.42–0.63)]. Consistent results were obtained when the laboratory data were included in the propensity score for matching. Conclusions: Long-term aspirin use significantly reduced the incidence of HCC and overall mortality without increasing gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

Long-term use of gastric-acid-suppressive drugs is known to be associated with several adverse effects. However, the association between enteric infection and acid suppression therapy is still uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between gastric acid suppression and the risk of enteric infection. Materials and Methods: We conducted a population-based case-control study using the data from Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) in Taiwan. Between January 2008 and December 2017, a total of 154,590 adult inpatients (age > 18) were identified. A pool of potential eligible controls according to four propensity scores matching by sex, age, and index year were extracted (n = 89,925). Subjects with missing data or who received less than 7 days of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and/or H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were excluded. Finally, 17,186 cases and 69,708 corresponding controls were selected for analysis. The use of PPIs and H2RAs, the result of microbiological samples, and co-morbidity conditions have been analyzed. Confounders were controlled by conditional logistic regression. Results: 32.84% of patients in the case group used PPIs, compared with 7.48% in the control group. Of patients in the case group, 9.9% used H2RAs, compared with 6.9% in the control group. Of patients in the case group, 8.3% used a combination of PPIs and H2RAs, compared with 2.7% in the control group. The most common etiological pathogens were Enterococcus (44.8%), Clostridioides difficile (34.5%), and Salmonella spp. (10.2%). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for PPI use with enteric infection was 5.526 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.274–5.791). For H2RAs, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.339 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.261–1.424). Compared to the control group, persons with enteric infection had more frequent acid-suppressive agent usage. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that gastric-acid-suppressive drug use is associated with an increased risk of enteric infection after adjusting for potential biases and confounders.

To investigate the impact of revascularization on long-term survival and renal outcome in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study includes NSTEMI patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m², including those on chronic hemodialysis who were identified from the multicenter Chang Gung Research Database from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to generate comparable groups. The survival and the risk of progression to chronic hemodialysis between those receiving revascularization, either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, and those receiving medical therapy during index hospitalization were compared. A total of 2821 NSTEMI patients with severe CKD, including 1141 patients on chronic hemodialysis, were identified. Of these, 1149 patients received revascularization and 1672 received medical therapies. The differences in demographics, comorbidities, and presentations between groups were balanced after inverse probability of treatment weighting. After a mean follow-up of 1.82 years, revascularization was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.70). For non-dialysis-dependent patients who had survival to discharge, revascularization had a higher risk of progression to chronic hemodialysis (adjusted HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.49-2.26) after a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. Revascularization was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in NSTEMI patients with severe CKD. For non-dialysis-dependent patients who survived to discharge, revascularization was associated with a higher risk of progression to chronic hemodialysis.

Background: Obesity is a global concern, driving the search for alternative treatments beyond lifestyle changes and medications. Laser acupuncture (LA) shows promise in obesity management, yet few studies compare it with FDA-approved medications. This study aimed to assess and compare LA’s impact with liraglutide on weight reduction in obese individuals. Methods: Data from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) (2013–2018) were analyzed. Primary outcomes included changes in body weight and BMI within 180 days, with secondary outcomes measuring the proportion achieving 5%, 10%, and 15% weight loss. Adverse events were also assessed. Results: Of 745 subjects (173 LA users, 572 liraglutide users), LA users lost more weight by day 180 (5.82 ± 4.39 vs. 2.38 ± 5.75 kg; p < 0.001) and had a greater BMI reduction (−2.27 ± 1.73 vs. −0.93 ± 2.25 kg/m²; p < 0.001). More LA users achieved 5% and 10% weight loss compared to liraglutide users (64.2% vs. 22.7%, 26.6% vs. 4.2%; all p < 0.001). After balancing baseline differences, LA’s benefits remained significant. No adverse events were reported with LA. Conclusions: LA may offer superior weight reduction compared to liraglutide. Future studies should explore LA alone or in combination with liraglutide for obesity management.