Vincenzo Sorgente

Dr. Vincenzo Sorgente

Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Tuscany, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
VSVincenzo Sorgente
Vincenzo Sorgente
ECErez James Cohen
Erez James Cohen
RBRiccardo Bravi
Riccardo Bravi
Diego MinciacchiDiego Minciacchi
Diego Minciacchi
Gross and fine motor competence have a close relationship during development and are shown to correlate to some extent. However, the study of the interaction between these domains still requires further insights. In this study, we investigated the developmental changes in overall motor skills as well as the effects of gross motor training programs on fine motor skills in children (aged 6–11, n = 240). Fine motor skills were assessed before and after gross motor intervention using the Box and Block Test. The gross motor intervention was based on the Test of Gross Motor Development—3rd Edition. Results showed that gross and fine motor skills correlate across all years of primary school, both significantly improving with age. Finally, the gross motor intervention appeared to not influence fine motor skills. Our findings show that during primary school age, overall motor development is continuous, but non-linear. From age nine onward, there seems to be a major step-up in overall motor competence, of which teachers/educators should be aware of in order to design motor educational programs accordingly. While gross and fine motor domains might be functionally integrated to enhance children’s motor performances, further research is needed to clarify the effect of gross motor practice on fine motor performances.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVincenzo Sorgente
Vincenzo Sorgente
AAAaron Agudo-Ortega
Aaron Agudo-Ortega
AHAlejandro Lopez Hernandez
Alejandro Lopez Hernandez
Jesús Santos del CerroJesús Santos del Cerro
Jesús Santos del Cerro
Diego MinciacchiDiego Minciacchi
Diego Minciacchi
José María González-RavéJosé María González-Ravé
José María González-Ravé
Evaluating force–velocity characteristics on dry-land is of the utmost importance in swimming, because higher levels of these bio-motor abilities positively affect in-water performance. However, the wide range of possible technical specializations presents an opportunity for a more categorized approach that has yet to be seized. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify feasible differences in maximum force–velocity exertion based on swimmers’ stroke and distance specialization. To this scope, 96 young male swimmers competing at the regional level were divided into 12 groups, one for each stroke (butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, and front crawl) and distance (50 m, 100 m, and 200 m). They performed two single pull-up tests, 5-min before and after competing in a federal swimming race. We assessed force (N) and velocity (m/s) exertion via linear encoder. There were no significant differences between pre-post maximum force–velocity exertions, despite the decreasing trend. Force-parameters highly correlated with each other and with the swimming performance time. Moreover, both force (t = −3.60, p < 0.001) and velocity (t = −3.90, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of swimming race time. Sprinters (both 50 m and 100 m) of all strokes could exert significantly higher force–velocity compared to 200 m swimmers (e.g., 0.96 ± 0.06 m/s performed by sprinters vs. 0.66 ± 0.03 m/s performed by 200 m swimmers). Moreover, breaststroke sprinters presented significantly lower force–velocity compared to sprinters specialized in the other strokes (e.g., 1047.83 ± 61.33 N performed by breaststroke sprinters vs. 1263.62 ± 161.23 N performed by butterfly sprinters). This study could provide the foundation for future research regarding the role of stroke and distance specializations in modeling swimmers’ force–velocity abilities, thus influencing paramount elements for specific training and improvement towards competitions.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVincenzo Sorgente
Vincenzo Sorgente
ECErez James Cohen
Erez James Cohen
RBRiccardo Bravi
Riccardo Bravi
Diego MinciacchiDiego Minciacchi
Diego Minciacchi
Two observational learning approaches have been shown to be successful in improving children’s motor performances: one is “technique-focused”, another is “goal-focused”. In this study, we sought to compare the effectiveness of these two strategies, thus testing for the more efficient method of observational learning to enhance motor skills in primary school children. To this end, two experiments were designed. Experiment 1 involved a precision ball throwing task. Experiment 2 involved a standing long jump task. A total of 792 subjects (aged 6–11) participated in this study and were divided into technique-focus (Experiment 1 n = 200; Experiment 2 n = 66), goal-focus (Experiment 1 n = 195; Experiment 2 n = 68), and control groups (Experiment 1 n = 199; Experiment 2 n = 64). The experiments were divided into pretest, practice, and retention phases. During the practice phase, the technique-focus and goal-focus groups were given different visual instructions on how to perform the task. The results showed that children aged 10–11 belonging to the technique-focus group performed significantly better in the practice phase than both the goal-focus and the control group (p < 0.001), but only for the precision ball throwing task. These findings could be useful for training adaptation in the context of motor learning and skills acquisition.

1 May 2024 in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
José María González-RavéJosé María González-Ravé
José María González-Ravé
VSVincenzo Sorgente
Vincenzo Sorgente
AAAaron Agudo-Ortega
Aaron Agudo-Ortega
VCVíctor Rodrigo Carranza
Víctor Rodrigo Carranza
SPStelios Psycharakis
Stelios Psycharakis
ATAnthony P Turner
Anthony P Turner
Purpose: Monitoring performance athletes’ training responses can be efficiently completed at competitive events. This study aimed to explore the changes in swimming, countermovement-jump (CMJ), and pull-up (PU) performance following training across a competitive phase, as well as immediately before and after each race. Methods: Fourteen well-trained male sprint/middle-distance swimmers (height 179 [7] cm, mass 70 [8] kg, age 18 [2] y), from 3 regional training groups, completed CMJ and PU tests before and after the national competitions in October and May, when race performance was also assessed. Results: Swimming race performance was significantly improved from before the national competitions in October to after the national competitions in May (1.8% [3.2%], P = .044, d = 0.60, moderate effect). Although there were no significant changes in PU velocity, CMJ performance significantly improved from before the national competitions in October to after the national competitions in May (mean difference 2.29 cm, P = .004, d = 3.52) and showed before-to-after race decreases (mean difference −1.64 cm, P = .04, d = 2.28). Conclusion: Swimming performance and CMJ performance improved as the season progressed, although these improvements were not directly correlated. PU performance did not appear to be sensitive to training or race-induced fatigue, in contrast to CMJ, in this group of male swimmers.

26 July 2023 in Frontiers in Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VCVioleta Muñoz de la Cruz
Violeta Muñoz de la Cruz
AAAarón Agudo-Ortega
Aarón Agudo-Ortega
VSVincenzo Sorgente
Vincenzo Sorgente
ATAnthony P. Turner
Anthony P. Turner
José María González-RavéJosé María González-Ravé
José María González-Ravé
Introduction: This study aimed to determine if adjusting the loads via velocity-based training (VBT) in each session is more efficient in monitoring the relative intensity than programming loads assessing 1RM pre-training.Methods: To achieve this, six national level sprinters were randomly divided into two groups, i.e., adjusting loads (AL, n = 3) and not adjusting loads (NAL, n = 3), during twelve sessions of a squat training (ST) program. During this training intervention, the AL group adjusted the intensity for each session in the squat exercise depending on the speed the load was lifted after warmup. The NAL group, instead, progressed in the squat exercise referring to the 1RM estimated at pre-test. In addition, Parallel Squat (PSQ), Countermovement Jump (CMJ), Squat Jump (SJ), 30 m sprint standing start (30S) and 30 m sprint flying start (30F) tests were carried out before and after conducting the ST program.Results: Interestingly, AL performed the ST near their estimated velocities at 70%—75% 1RM, however with a wider gap at 80%—85% 1RM. The NAL group, instead, did not presented such a detectable behaviour across the whole ST. Moreover, both groups demonstrated improved performances in PSQ, CMJ, and SJ, whereas there were little changes in 30S and 30F after ST. Additionally, AL obtained a greater effect size than NAL in PSQ (0.60 vs. 0.35) but lower effect size in CMJ, SJ, 30S, and 30F (0.41 vs. 0.63, 0.30 vs. 0.40, 0.04 vs. 0.28 and 0.22 vs. 0.24). However, percentage change was greater in AL in all tests.Discussion: Based on these findings, we can conclude that further investigation into the AL strategy in VBT is warranted for sprinter athletes’ daily strength practices. The AL technique shows promise as a valuable tool for accurately adjusting and monitoring medium-high training loads to ensure they align with the intended intensity.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAManuel Amore
Manuel Amore
Diego MinciacchiDiego Minciacchi
Diego Minciacchi
GPGiulia Panconi
Giulia Panconi
SGSara Guarducci
Sara Guarducci
RBRiccardo Bravi
Riccardo Bravi
VSVincenzo Sorgente
Vincenzo Sorgente
Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a six-week integrated resisted sprint training (IRST) program on sprint performance and vertical jump height in a sample of U-14 male football players. This study also explored the potential benefits of incorporating variable resistive loads during pre-peak height velocity (pre-PHV) developmental stages, a period often overlooked in the training of young athletes. The IRST program alternated between heavy and light resistive sled loads to enhance sprint and jump capabilities, which are critical components of athletic performance in football. Methods: Nineteen healthy male football players (age: 13 ± 0.63 years) were divided into an experimental group (E, n = 10) and a control group (C, n = 9). The experimental group followed the IRST protocol, involving sled sprints with varying resistive loads (10–115% of the body mass) over specific distances, while the control group engaged in traditional unresisted sprint training. The sprint performance was assessed using 30 m sprint times, and the vertical jump height was measured using countermovement jump (CMJ) data collected via a force platform. Anthropometric measures and peak height velocity (aPHV) estimates were also recorded pre- and post-intervention. Results: The experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in 30 m sprint times (mean difference: −0.29 s; p < 0.01). Additionally, CMJ data revealed a positive trend in the take-off velocity and maximum concentric power, with an increase in jump height (mean difference: +0.44 cm). These results suggest enhanced sprint and explosive power capabilities following the IRST intervention. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the IRST program is an effective training method for enhancing sprint performance and maintaining jump capabilities in young football players. This approach highlights the importance of integrating variable resistance training in pre-PHV athletes to promote athletic development while ensuring safety and effectiveness.