Albert Pinhasov

Prof. Albert Pinhasov

Department of Molecular Biology, Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel 4070000, Israel
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1999 in Journal of Neurochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMerav Bassan
Merav Bassan
RZRachel Zamostiano
Rachel Zamostiano
ADAriane Davidson
Ariane Davidson
APAlbert Pinhasov
Albert Pinhasov
EGEliezer Giladi
Eliezer Giladi
IGIllana Gozes
Illana Gozes

1 August 2003 in Developmental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAlbert Pinhasov
Albert Pinhasov
SMShmuel Mandel
Shmuel Mandel
ATArkady Torchinsky
Arkady Torchinsky
EGEliezer Giladi
Eliezer Giladi
ZPZipora Pittel
Zipora Pittel
IGIllana Gozes
Illana Gozes

1 January 2001 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RZRachel Zamostiano
Rachel Zamostiano
APAlbert Pinhasov
Albert Pinhasov
EGEdgar Gelber
Edgar Gelber
RSRuth A. Steingart
Ruth A. Steingart
ESEyal Seroussi
Eyal Seroussi
IGIllana Gozes
Illana Gozes
We have recently cloned the mouse activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP). Here, we disclose the cloning of human ADNP (hADNP) from a fetal brain cDNA library. Comparative sequence analysis of these two ADNP orthologs indicated 90% identity at the mRNA level. Several single nucleotide polymorphic sites were noticed. The deduced protein structure contained nine zinc fingers, a proline-rich region, a nuclear bipartite localization signal, and a homeobox domain profile, suggesting a transcription factor function. Further comparative analysis identified an ADNP paralog (33% identity and 46% similarity), indicating that these genes belong to a novel protein family with a nine-zinc finger motif followed by a homeobox domain. The hADNP gene structure spans approximately 40 kilobases and includes five exons and four introns with alternative splicing of an untranslated second exon. The hADNP gene was mapped to chromosome 20q12-13.2, a region associated with aggressive tumor growth, frequently amplified in many neoplasias, including breast, bladder, ovarian, pancreatic, and colon cancers. hADNP mRNA is abundantly expressed in distinct normal tissues, and high expression levels were encountered in malignant cells. Down-regulation of ADNP by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides up-regulated the tumor suppressor p53 and reduced the viability of intestinal cancer cells by 90%. Thus, ADNP is implicated in maintaining cell survival, perhaps through modulation of p53.

1 November 2007 in The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IVInna Vulih-Shultzman
Inna Vulih-Shultzman
APAlbert Pinhasov
Albert Pinhasov
SMShmuel Mandel
Shmuel Mandel
NGNikolaos Grigoriadis
Nikolaos Grigoriadis
OTOlga Touloumi
Olga Touloumi
Illana GozesIllana Gozes
Illana Gozes
Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) differentially interacts with chromatin to regulate essential genes. Because complete ADNP deficiency is embryonic lethal, the outcome of partial ADNP deficiency was examined. ADNP+/– mice exhibited cognitive deficits, significant increases in phosphorylated tau, tangle-like structures, and neurodegeneration compared with ADNP+/+ mice. Increased tau hyperphosphorylation is known to cause memory impairments in neurodegenerative diseases associated with tauopathies, including the most prevalent Alzheimer's disease. The current results suggest that ADNP is an essential protein for brain function and plays a role in normal cognitive performance. ADNP-deficient mice offer an ideal paradigm for evaluation of cognitive enhancers. NAP (NAPVSIPQ) is a peptide derived from ADNP that interacts with microtubules and provides potent neuroprotection. NAP treatment partially ameliorated cognitive deficits and reduced tau hyperphosphorylation in the ADNP+/– mice. NAP is currently in phase II clinical trials assessing effects on mild cognitive impairment.

14 January 2021 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaria Becker
Maria Becker
APAlbert Pinhasov
Albert Pinhasov
Asher OrnoyAsher Ornoy
Asher Ornoy
Depression is apparently the most common psychiatric disease among the mood disorders affecting about 10% of the adult population. The etiology and pathogenesis of depression are still poorly understood. Hence, as for most human diseases, animal models can help us understand the pathogenesis of depression and, more importantly, may facilitate the search for therapy. In this review we first describe the more common tests used for the evaluation of depressive-like symptoms in rodents. Then we describe different models of depression and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. These models can be divided into several categories: genetic models, models induced by mental acute and chronic stressful situations caused by environmental manipulations (i.e., learned helplessness in rats/mice), models induced by changes in brain neuro-transmitters or by specific brain injuries and models induced by pharmacological tools. In spite of the fact that none of the models completely resembles human depression, most animal models are relevant since they mimic many of the features observed in the human situation and may serve as a powerful tool for the study of the etiology, pathogenesis and treatment of depression, especially since only few patients respond to acute treatment. Relevance increases by the fact that human depression also has different facets and many possible etiologies and therapies.

1 June 2000 in The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Illana GozesIllana Gozes
Illana Gozes
EGEliezer Giladi
Eliezer Giladi
APAlbert Pinhasov
Albert Pinhasov
ABAmos Bardea
Amos Bardea
DBDouglas E. Brenneman
Douglas E. Brenneman