Gardenia Vargas-Parra

Dr. Gardenia Vargas-Parra

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 February 2014 in Human Molecular Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura ValleLaura Valle
Laura Valle
EHEva Hernández-Illán
Eva Hernández-Illán
FBFernando Bellido
Fernando Bellido
GAGemma Aiza
Gemma Aiza
ACAdela Castillejo
Adela Castillejo
Ignacio BlancoIgnacio Blanco
Ignacio Blanco
Germline mutations in DNA polymerase ɛ (POLE) and δ (POLD1) have been recently identified in families with multiple colorectal adenomas and colorectal cancer (CRC). All reported cases carried POLE c.1270C>G (p.Leu424Val) or POLD1 c.1433G>A (p.Ser478Asn) mutations. Due to the scarcity of cases reported so far, an accurate clinical phenotype has not been defined. We aimed to assess the prevalence of these recurrent mutations in unexplained familial and early-onset CRC and polyposis, and to add additional information to define the clinical characteristics of mutated cases. A total of 858 familial/early onset CRC and polyposis patients were studied: 581 familial and early-onset CRC cases without mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, 86 cases with MMR deficiency and 191 polyposis cases. Mutation screening was performed by KASPar genotyping assays and/or Sanger sequencing of the involved exons. POLE p.L424V was identified in a 28-year-old polyposis and CRC patient, as a de novo mutation. None of the 858 cases studied carried POLD1 p.S478N. A new mutation, POLD1 c.1421T>C (p.Leu474Pro), was identified in a mismatch repair proficient Amsterdam II family. Its pathogenicity was supported by cosegregation in the family, in silico predictions, and previously published yeast assays. POLE and POLD1 mutations explain a fraction of familial CRC and polyposis. Sequencing the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 should be considered in routine genetic diagnostics. Until additional evidence is gathered, POLE and POLD1 genetic testing should not be restricted to polyposis cases, and the presence of de novo mutations, considered.

1 September 2014 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAdela Castillejo
Adela Castillejo
GVGardenia Vargas-Parra
Gardenia Vargas-Parra
MCMaría Isabel Castillejo
María Isabel Castillejo
MNMatilde Navarro
Matilde Navarro
VBVíctor Manuel Barberá
Víctor Manuel Barberá
JSJosé Luis Soto
José Luis Soto

30 March 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJesús del Valle
Jesús del Valle
PRPaula Rofes
Paula Rofes
JMJosé Marcos Moreno-Cabrera
José Marcos Moreno-Cabrera
ALAdriana López-Dóriga
Adriana López-Dóriga
SBSami Belhadj
Sami Belhadj
Conxi LázaroConxi Lázaro
Conxi Lázaro
Fanconi anemia (FA) is caused by biallelic mutations in FA genes. Monoallelic mutations in five of these genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, BRIP1 and RAD51C) increase the susceptibility to breast/ovarian cancer and are used in clinical diagnostics as bona-fide hereditary cancer genes. Increasing evidence suggests that monoallelic mutations in other FA genes could predispose to tumor development, especially breast cancer. The objective of this study is to assess the mutational spectrum of 14 additional FA genes (FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCI, FANCL, FANCM, FANCP, FANCQ, FANCR and FANCU) in a cohort of hereditary cancer patients, to compare with local cancer-free controls as well as GnomAD. A total of 1021 hereditary cancer patients and 194 controls were analyzed using our next generation custom sequencing panel. We identified 35 pathogenic variants in eight genes. A significant association with the risk of breast cancer/breast and ovarian cancer was found for carriers of FANCA mutations (odds ratio (OR) = 3.14 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–6.17, p = 0.003). Two patients with early-onset cancer showed a pathogenic FA variant in addition to another germline mutation, suggesting a modifier role for FA variants. Our results encourage a comprehensive analysis of FA genes in larger studies to better assess their role in cancer risk.

4 July 2012 in European Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMarta Pineda
Marta Pineda
Pilar MurPilar Mur
Pilar Mur
MIMaría Dolores Iniesta
María Dolores Iniesta
EBEster Borràs
Ester Borràs
OCOlga Campos
Olga Campos
GCGabriel Capellá
Gabriel Capellá

1 December 2020 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAgostina Stradella
Agostina Stradella
JVJesús del Valle
Jesús del Valle
PRPaula Rofes
Paula Rofes
GVGardenia Vargas-Parra
Gardenia Vargas-Parra
MSMónica Salinas
Mónica Salinas
Conxi LázaroConxi Lázaro
Conxi Lázaro

2 June 2017 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GVGardenia Vargas-Parra
Gardenia Vargas-Parra
MGMaribel González‐Acosta
Maribel González‐Acosta
BTBryony Thompson
Bryony Thompson
CGCarolina Gómez
Carolina Gómez
AFAnna Fernández
Anna Fernández
GCGabriel Capellá
Gabriel Capellá
In a proportion of patients presenting mismatch repair (MMR)‐deficient tumors, no germline MMR mutations are identified, the so‐called Lynch‐like syndrome (LLS). Recently, MMR‐deficient tumors have been associated with germline mutations in POLE and MUTYH or double somatic MMR events. Our aim was to elucidate the molecular basis of MSH2‐deficient LS‐suspected cases using a comprehensive analysis of colorectal cancer (CRC)‐associated genes at germline and somatic level. Fifty‐eight probands harboring MSH2‐deficient tumors were included. Germline mutational analysis of MSH2 (including EPCAM deletions) and MSH6 was performed. Pathogenicity of MSH2 variants was assessed by RNA analysis and multifactorial likelihood calculations. MSH2 cDNA and methylation of MSH2 and MSH6 promoters were studied. Matched blood and tumor DNA were analyzed using a customized next generation sequencing panel. Thirty‐five individuals were carriers of pathogenic or probably pathogenic variants in MSH2 and EPCAM. Five patients harbored 4 different MSH2 variants of unknown significance (VUS) and one had 2 novel MSH6 promoter VUS. Pathogenicity assessment allowed the reclassification of the 4 MSH2 VUS and 6 probably pathogenic variants as pathogenic mutations, enabling a total of 40 LS diagnostics. Predicted pathogenic germline variants in BUB1, SETD2, FAN1 and MUTYH were identified in 5 cases. Three patients had double somatic hits in MSH2 or MSH6, and another 2 had somatic alterations in other MMR genes and/or proofreading polymerases. In conclusion, our comprehensive strategy combining germline and somatic mutational status of CRC‐associated genes by means of a subexome panel allows the elucidation of up to 86% of MSH2‐deficient suspected LS tumors.