Precipitation is a crucial component of the water cycle and plays a key role in hydrological processes. Recently, satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs) have provided grid-based precipitation with spatiotemporal variability. However, SPPs contain a lot of uncertainty in estimated precipitation, and the spatial resolution of these products is still relatively coarse. To overcome these limitations, this study aims to generate new grid-based daily precipitation based on a combination of rainfall observation data with multiple SPPs for the period of 2003–2017 across South Korea. A Random Forest (RF) machine-learning algorithm model was applied for producing a new merged precipitation product. In addition, several statistical linear merging methods have been adopted to compare with the results achieved from the RF model. To investigate the efficiency of RF, rainfall data from 64 observed Automated Synoptic Observation System (ASOS) installations were collected to analyze the accuracy of products through several continuous as well as categorical indicators. The new precipitation values produced by the merging procedure generally not only report higher accuracy than a single satellite rainfall product but also indicate that RF is more effective than the statistical merging method. Thus, the achievements from this study point out that the RF model might be applied for merging multiple satellite precipitation products, especially in sparse region areas.

Wildfires are increasingly frequent and severe, posing substantial risks to ecosystems, communities, and infrastructure. Accurately mapping wildfire severity (WSM) using remote sensing and machine learning (ML) is critical for evaluating damages, informing recovery efforts, and guiding long-term mitigation strategies. Stacking ensemble ML (SEML) enhances predictive accuracy and robustness by combining multiple diverse models into a single meta-learned predictor. This approach leverages the complementary strengths of individual base learners while reducing variance, ultimately improving model reliability. This study aims to optimize a SEML framework to (1) identify the most effective ML models for use as base learners and meta-learners, and (2) determine the optimal number of base models needed for robust and accurate wildfire severity predictions. The study utilizes six ML models—Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Linear Regression (LR), Adaptive Boosting (AB), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)—to construct an SEML. To quantify wildfire impacts, we extracted 118 spectral indices from post-fire Landsat-8 data and incorporated four additional predictors (land cover, elevation, slope, and aspect). A dataset of 911 CBI observations from 18 wildfire events was used for training, and models were validated through cross-validation and bootstrapping to ensure robustness. To address multicollinearity and reduce computational complexity, we applied Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and condensed the dataset into three primary components. Our results indicated that simpler models, notably LR and KNN, performed well as meta-learners, with LR achieving the highest predictive accuracy. Moreover, using only two base learners (RF and SVM) was sufficient to realize optimal SEML performance, with an overall accuracy and precision of 0.661, recall of 0.662, and F1-score of 0.656. These findings demonstrate that SEML can enhance wildfire severity mapping by improving prediction accuracy and supporting more informed resource allocation and management decisions. Future research should explore additional meta-learning approaches and incorporate emerging remote sensing data sources such as hyperspectral and LiDAR.

Wildfire behavior and post-fire effects are strongly modulated by terrain, yet the relative influence of individual topographic factors on burn severity remains incompletely quantified at landscape scales. The Composite Burn Index (CBI) provides a field-calibrated measure of severity, but large-area analyses have been hampered by limited plot density and cumbersome data extraction workflows. In this study, we paired 6150 CBI plots from 234 U.S. wildfire events (1994–2017) with 30 m SRTM DEM, extracting mean elevation, slope, and compass aspect within a 90 m buffer around each plot to minimize geolocation noise. Topographic variables were grouped into ecologically meaningful classes—six elevation belts (≤500 m to >2500 m), six slope bins (≤5° to >25°), and eight aspect octants—and their relationships with CBI were evaluated using Tukey HSD post hoc comparisons. Our findings show that all three factors exerted highly significant influences on severity (p < 0.001): mean CBI peaked in the 1500–2000 m belt (0.42 higher than lowlands), rose almost monotonically with steepness to slopes > 20° (0.37 higher than <5°), and was greatest on east- and northwest-facing slopes (0.19 higher than south-facing aspects). Further analysis revealed that burn severity emerges from strongly context-dependent synergies among elevation, slope, and aspect, rather than from simple additive effects. By demonstrating a rapid, reproducible workflow for terrain-aware severity assessment entirely within GEE, the study provides both methodological guidance and actionable insights for fuel-management planning, risk mapping, and post-fire restoration prioritization.

Calculating rainfall erosivity, which is the capacity of rainfall to dislodge soil particles and cause erosion, requires the measurement of the rainfall kinetic energy (KE). Direct measurement of KE has its own challenges, owing to the high cost and complexity of the measuring instruments involved. Consequently, the KE is often approximated using empirical equations derived from rainfall intensity (I_r) inputs in the absence of such instruments. However, the KE–I_r equations strongly depend on local climate patterns and measurement methods. Therefore, this study aims to compare and evaluate the efficacy of 27 KE–I_r equations with observed data. Based on a re-analysis, we also propose an exponential KE–I_r equation for the entire Korean site, and the spatial distribution of its parameter in the equation is also discussed. In this investigation, we used an optical disdrometer (OTT Parsivel²) to gather data in Sangju City (Korea) between June 2020 and December 2021. The outputs of this study are shown as follows: (1) The statistically most accurate estimates of KE expenditure and KE content in Sangju City are obtained using power-law equations given by Sanchez-Moreno et al. and exponential equations published by Lee and Won, respectively. (2) The suggested KE–I_r equation applied to the entire Korean site exhibits a comparable general correlation with the observed data. The parameter maps indicate a high variance in geography.

Wildfires increasingly threaten ecosystems and infrastructure, making accurate burn severity mapping (BSM) essential for effective disaster response and environmental management. Machine learning (ML) models utilizing satellite-derived vegetation indices are crucial for assessing wildfire damage; however, incorporating many indices can lead to multicollinearity, reducing classification accuracy. While principal component analysis (PCA) is commonly used to address this issue, its effectiveness relative to other feature extraction (FE) methods in BSM remains underexplored. This study aims to enhance ML classifier accuracy in BSM by evaluating various FE techniques that mitigate multicollinearity among vegetation indices. Using composite burn index (CBI) data from the 2014 Carlton Complex fire in the United States as a case study, we extracted 118 vegetation indices from seven Landsat-8 spectral bands. We applied and compared 13 different FE techniques—including linear and nonlinear methods such as PCA, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Isomap, uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), factor analysis (FA), independent component analysis (ICA), multidimensional scaling (MDS), truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD), non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), locally linear embedding (LLE), spectral embedding (SE), and neighborhood components analysis (NCA). The performance of these techniques was benchmarked against six ML classifiers to determine their effectiveness in improving BSM accuracy. Our results show that alternative FE techniques can outperform PCA, improving classification accuracy and computational efficiency. Techniques like LDA and NCA effectively capture nonlinear relationships critical for accurate BSM. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive comparison of FE methods, highlighting the potential benefits of underutilized techniques in BSM.