Background and Purpose—: The recent Save ChildS study provides multicenter evidence for the use of mechanical thrombectomy in children with large vessel occlusion arterial ischemic stroke. However, device selection for thrombectomy may influence rates of recanalization, complications, and neurological outcomes, especially in pediatric patients of different ages. We, therefore, performed additional analyses of the Save ChildS data to investigate a possible association of different thrombectomy techniques and devices with angiographic and clinical outcome parameters. Methods—: The Save ChildS cohort study (January 2000–December 2018) analyzed data from 27 European and United States stroke centers and included all pediatric patients (<18 years), diagnosed with arterial ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular recanalization. Patients were grouped into first-line contact aspiration (A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique [ADAPT]) and non-ADAPT groups as well as different stent retriever size groups. Associations with baseline characteristics, recanalization rates (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction), complication rates, and neurological outcome parameters (Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale after 24 hours and 7 days; modified Rankin Scale and Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure at discharge, after 6 and 24 months) were investigated. Results—: Seventy-three patients with a median age of 11.3 years were included. Currently available stent retrievers were used in 59 patients (80.8%), of which 4×20 mm (width×length) was the most frequently chosen size (36 patients =61%). A first-line ADAPT approach was used in 7 patients (9.6%), and 7 patients (9.6%) were treated with first-generation thrombectomy devices. In this study, a first-line ADAPT approach was neither associated with the rate of successful recanalization (ADAPT 85.7% versus 87.5% No ADAPT) nor with the complication rate or the neurological outcome. Moreover, there were no associations of stent retriever sizes with rates of recanalization, complication rates, or outcome parameters. Conclusions—: Our study suggests that neurological outcomes are generally good regardless of any specific device selection and suggests that it is important to offer thrombectomy in eligible children regardless of technique or device selection. Registration—: URL: https://www.drks.de/ ; Unique identifier: DRKS00016528.

Background: The key imaging features of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) are lobar, cortical, or cortico-subcortical microbleeds, macrohaemorrhages and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS). In contrast, hypertensive angiopathy is characterized by (micro) haemorrhages in the basal ganglia, thalami, periventricular white matter or the brain stem. Another distinct form of haemorrhagic microangiopathy is mixed cerebral microbleeds (mixed CMB) with features of both CAA and hypertensive angiopathy. The distinction between the two entities (CAA and mixed CMB) is clinically relevant because the risk of haemorrhage and stroke should be well balanced if oral anticoagulation is indicated in CAA patients. We aimed to comprehensively compare these two entities. Methods: Patients with probable CAA according to the modified Boston criteria and mixed CMB without macrohaemorrhage were retrospectively identified from our database. Comprehensive comparison regarding clinical and radiological parameters was performed between the two cohorts. Results: Patients with CAA were older (78 ± 8 vs. 74 ± 9 years, p = 0.036) and had a higher prevalence of cSS (19% vs. 4%, p = 0.027) but a lower prevalence of lacunes (73% vs. 50%, p = 0.018) and deep lacunes (23% vs. 51%, p = 0.0003) compared to patients with mixed CMB. Logistic regression revealed an association between the presence of deep lacunes and mixed CMB. The other collected parameters did not reveal a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: CAA and mixed CMB demonstrate radiological differences in the absence of macrohaemorrhages. However, more clinically available biomarkers are needed to elucidate the contribution of CAA and hypertensive angiopathy in mixed CMB patients.

Background: Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating condition if untreated. The optimal treatment strategy, however, is unknown. Historically, interventional approaches have been favored over intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), although this is not supported by good evidence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and compare the results for treatment modalities of BAO, namely, IVT and interventional stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT). Methods: Studies on IVT and SRT in BAO were systematically searched. Successful recanalization (TICI ≥2b), favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), mortality, and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) were the target parameters. Only studies with ≥15 patients were included. IVT prior to SRT was allowed. Studies were excluded (1) if >1 thrombectomy device was used in >50% of the patients and (2) when data on outcome or treatment could not be parsed (e.g. registries). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio estimation. Results are given as OR and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The χ² test was used to compare the outcome parameters clinical outcome, recanalization, mortality, and SICH. Results: A total of 17 studies (4 on IVT and 13 on SRT) with a total of 672 patients (IVT, n = 314; SRT, n = 358) were identified. Cumulatively, we found a highly significantly improved clinical outcome (43 vs. 31%, p = 0.004, OR [95% CI] = 1.66 [1.21, 2.76]), increased recanalization rate (88 vs. 60%, p < 0.00001, OR [95% CI] = 3.99 [2.73, 5.84]), and decreased mortality (26 vs. 41%, p = 0.0004, OR [95% CI] = 1.86 [1.33, 2.61]), as well as an equal rate of SICH (5 vs. 7%, p = 0.15, OR [95% CI] = 1.68 [0.82, 3.43]), in patients treated with SRT compared to those treated with IVT alone. Conclusions: The data from this meta-analysis suggest a possible superiority of SRT over IVT, pending positive results of randomized controlled trials. According to international recommendations, patients with BAO should preferentially be treated with SRT; if no contraindications exist, IVT should not be withheld.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Non-contrast-enhanced MRA techniques have experienced a renaissance due to the known correlation between the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and the deposition of gadolinium in some brain regions. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of ungated non-contrast-enhanced radial quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA of the extracranial supra-aortic arteries in comparison with conventional contrast-enhanced MRA in patients with clinical suspicion of carotid stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, both MRA pulse sequences were performed in 31 consecutive patients (median age, 68.8 years; 19 men). For the evaluation, the cervical arterial system was divided into 35 segments (right and left side). Three blinded reviewers separately evaluated these segments. An ordinal scoring system was used to assess the image quality of arterial segments and the stenosis grading of carotid arteries. RESULTS: Overall venous contamination in quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA was rated as “none” by all readers in 84.9% of cases and in 8.1% of cases in contrast-enhanced MRA (P < .0001). The visualization quality of arterial segments was considered good to excellent in 40.2% for the quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA and in 52.2% for the contrast-enhanced MRA (P < .0001). The diagnostic accuracy of ungated quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA concerning the stenosis grading showed a total sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ungated quiescent-interval slice-selective MRA can be used clinically as an alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA without a significantly different image quality or diagnostic accuracy for the detection of carotid stenosis at 1.5T.