Scott Pitnick

Dr. Scott Pitnick


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 April 2010 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMollie K. Manier
Mollie K. Manier
JBJohn M. Belote
John M. Belote
KBKirstin S. Berben
Kirstin S. Berben
DNDavid Novikov
David Novikov
WSWill T. Stuart
Will T. Stuart
SPScott Pitnick
Scott Pitnick
Battle of the Sperm: In insects, sperm from multiple matings are stored and retained, and are thought to compete for ova within a female's reproductive tract. Manier et al. (p. 354 , published online 18 March) visualized sperm from fruit flies transgenically tagged with green or red fluorescent protein within the reproductive tracts of female flies. Sperm showed more mobility within the female storage organs than expected, with those from the most recent copulation displacing sperm from previous males; however, sperm viability remained consistent over long-term storage and each male's sperm was equally competitive in fertilizing the female's eggs.

7 September 2002 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPScott Pitnick
Scott Pitnick
Francisco Garcia GonzalezFrancisco Garcia Gonzalez
Francisco Garcia Gonzalez
Previous studies indicate that female Drosophila melanogaster are harmed by their mates through copulation. Here, we demonstrate that the harm that males inflict upon females increases with male size. Specifically, both the lifespan and egg–production rate of females decreased significantly as an increasing function of the body size of their mates. Consequently, females mating with larger males had lower lifetime fitness. The detrimental effect of male size on female longevity was not mediated by male effects on female fecundity, egg–production rate or female–remating behaviour. Similarly, the influence of male size on female lifetime fecundity was independent of the male–size effect on female longevity. There was no relationship between female size and female resistance to male harm. Thus, although increasing male body size is known to enhance male mating success, it has a detrimental effect on the direct fitness of their mates. Our results indicate that this harm is a pleiotropic effect of some other selected function and not an adaptation. To the extent that females prefer to mate with larger males, this choice is harmful, a pattern that is consistent with the theory of sexually antagonistic coevolution.

1 December 1999 in Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPScott Pitnick
Scott Pitnick
TMTherese Marrow
Therese Marrow
GSGreg S. Spicer
Greg S. Spicer

22 May 2001 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPScott Pitnick
Scott Pitnick
GMG. T. Miller
G. T. Miller
JRJ. Reagan
J. Reagan
BHB. Holland
B. Holland
We evaluated the influence of pre– and post–copulatory sexual selection upon male reproductive traits in a naturally promiscuous species, Drosophila melanogaster. Sexual selection was removed in two replicate populations through enforced monogamous mating with random mate assignment or retained in polyandrous controls. Monogamous mating eliminates all opportunities for mate competition, mate discrimination, sperm competition, cryptic female choice and, hence, sexual conflict. Levels of divergence between lines in sperm production and male fitness traits were quantified after 38–81 generations of selection. Three a priori predictions were tested: (i) male investment in spermatogenesis will be lower in monogamy–line males due to the absence of sperm competition selection, (ii) due to the evolution of increased male benevolence, the fitness of females paired with monogamy–line males will be higher than that of females paired with control–line males, and (iii) monogamy–line males will exhibit decreased competitive reproductive success relative to control–line males. The first two predictions were supported, whereas the third prediction was not. Monogamy males evolved a smaller body size and the size of their testes and the number of sperm within the testes were disproportionately further reduced. In contrast, the fitness of monogamous males (and their mates) was greater when reproducing in a non–competitive context: females mated once with monogamous males produced offspring at a faster rate and produced a greater total number of surviving progeny than did females mated to control males. The results indicate that sexual selection favours the production of increased numbers of sperm in D. melanogaster and that sexual selection favours some male traits conferring a direct cost to the fecundity of females.

6 December 2005 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPScott Pitnick
Scott Pitnick
KJKate E Jones
Kate E Jones
GWGerald S Wilkinson
Gerald S Wilkinson
The contribution of sexual selection to brain evolution has been little investigated. Through comparative analyses of bats, we show that multiple mating by males, in the absence of multiple mating by females, has no evolutionary impact on relative brain dimension. In contrast, bat species with promiscuous females have relatively smaller brains than do species with females exhibiting mate fidelity. This pattern may be a consequence of the demonstrated negative evolutionary relationship between investment in testes and investment in brains, both metabolically expensive tissues. These results have implications for understanding the correlated evolution of brains, behaviour and extravagant sexually selected traits.

22 July 2003 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPScott Pitnick
Scott Pitnick
GMGary T. Miller
Gary T. Miller
KSKarin Schneider
Karin Schneider
TMTherese A. Markow
Therese A. Markow
Interspecific studies indicate that sperm morphology and other ejaculatory traits diverge more rapidly than other types of character in Drosophila and other taxa. This pattern has largely been attributed to postcopulatory sexual selection involving interaction between the sexes. Such divergence has been suggested to lead rapidly to reproductive isolation among populations and thus to be an ‘engine of speciation.’ Here, we test two critical predictions of this hypothesis: (i) there is significant variation in reproductive traits among incipient species; and (ii) divergence in interacting sex–specific traits exhibits a coevolutionary pattern among populations within a species, by examining geographical variation in Drosophila mojavensis, a species in the early stages of speciation. Significant among–population variation was identified in sperm length and female sperm–storage organ length, and a strong pattern of correlated evolution between these interacting traits was observed. In addition, crosses among populations revealed coevolution of male and female contributions to egg size. Support for these two important predictions confirms that coevolving internal characters that mediate successful reproduction may play an important part in speciation. The next step is to determine exactly what that role is.