The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of glutamine to treat severe mucositis induced by radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer. We undertook electronic searches of PubMed (1990 to January 2015), Embase (1990 to January 2015), and the Cochrane Library (2013, Issue 2) to identify relevant studies. We included randomized controlled trials of glutamine to alleviate oral mucositis (OM) in patients with head and neck cancer who received radiotherapy. Information regarding methods, patients, results, and risk of bias was independently extracted by two authors. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) using fixed-effect models. We identified five clinical studies that included 234 patients with head and neck cancer. All studies were assessed as being at low risk of bias in most items of six domains. In this meta-analysis, glutamine treatment showed a statistically significant benefit with respect to reducing the risk and severity of OM induced by radiotherapy compared to either placebo or no treatment (risk ratio 0.17, 95%CI 0.06–0.47). Overall, glutamine significantly reduces the risk and severity of OM during radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Further prospective and large trials are required to support the findings.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of SBRT compared to sorafenib which is the only drug for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A Markov decision-analytic model was performed to compare the cost-effectiveness of SBRT and sorafenib for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients transitioned between three health states: stable disease, progression disease and death. We calculated the data on cost from the perspective of our National Health Insurance Bureau. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the impact of several variables. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for sorafenib compared to SBRT was NT$3,788,238 per quality-adjusted life year gained (cost/QALY), which was higher than the willingness to pay threshold of Taiwan according to WHO’s guideline. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the utility of progression disease for the sorafenib treatment, utility of progression free survival for SBRT, utility of progression free survival for sorafenib, utility of PFS to progression disease for SBRT and transition probability of progression disease to dead for SBRT were the most sensitive parameters in all cost scenarios. The Monte-Carlo simulation demonstrated that the probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness to pay threshold of NT$ 2,213,145 per QALY was 100 % and 0 % chance for SBRT and sorafenib. This study indicated that SBRT for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold as defined by WHO guideline in Taiwan.

To evaluate the risk of breast cancer associated with long-term use of antihypertensive agents (AHs) in Taiwanese women with hypertension.

(2015). Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in elderly women with HER-2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of real-world data. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety: Vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 1661-1671. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1089231

Background: Trastuzumab was considered a cost-effective adjuvant treatment for HER 2-positive early breast cancer. Since 2010, the Taiwanese National Health Insurance (NHI) has started to reimburse for 1-year adjuvant treatment. This study aims to provide an updated cost-effectiveness analysis from the NHI perspective, which explores assumptions about long-term cardiac toxicity and treatment benefit of 1-year adjuvant treatment sequentially after chemotherapy. Methods: A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab for HER-2/neu positive early breast cancer over a 20-year life-time horizon. A probability sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation was performed to characterize uncertainties in the expected outcomes, which are expressed as an incremental costs effectiveness ratio (ICER, cost/QALY). A willingness-to-pay threshold of 3-times the per capita gross domestic product was adopted according to the WHO definition. The Taiwan per capita gross domestic product in 2015 was US$22,355; thus, a threshold was considered as NT$2,011,950 (US$67 065, 1USD =30 NTD in 2015). Results: The model showed that adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in HER-2/neu positive early breast cancer yielded 1.631 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) compared with no trastuzumab treatment. The ICER was US $51,863 per QALY gained in the base-case scenario. The Monte Carlo simulation by varying all variables simultaneously demonstrated that the probability of cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$67,065 was 50% for 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab. Conclusions: From this real-world study, 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab treatment is likely to be a cost-effective therapy for patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer at the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3-times GDP per capita in Taiwan.