Graciela Garrote

Dr. Graciela Garrote

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2015 in Immunobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CICarolina Iraporda
Carolina Iraporda
AEAgustina Errea
Agustina Errea
DRDavid E. Romanin
David E. Romanin
DCDelphine Cayet
Delphine Cayet
EPElba Pereyra
Elba Pereyra
MRMartín Rumbo
Martín Rumbo

4 July 2013 in World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GDGabriela Diosma
Gabriela Diosma
DRDavid E. Romanin
David E. Romanin
MRMaría F. Rey-Burusco
María F. Rey-Burusco
ALAlejandra Londero
Alejandra Londero
GGGraciela Garrote
Graciela Garrote

1 February 2018 in Food Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAna Agustina Bengoa
Ana Agustina Bengoa
MLM. Goretti Llamas
M. Goretti Llamas
CICarolina Iraporda
Carolina Iraporda
MDMaría Teresa Dueñas-Chasco
María Teresa Dueñas-Chasco
Analia G AbrahamAnalia G Abraham
Analia G Abraham
GGGraciela Garrote
Graciela Garrote

22 September 2021 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAna Agustina Bengoa
Ana Agustina Bengoa
CDCarolina Dardis
Carolina Dardis
GGGraciela Garrote
Graciela Garrote
Analia G AbrahamAnalia G Abraham
Analia G Abraham
Among artisanal fermented beverages, kefir (fermented milk drink) and water kefir (fermented nondairy beverage) are of special interest because their grains can be considered natural reservoirs of safe and potentially probiotic strains. In the last years, several reports on Lacticaseibacillus paracasei (formerly Lactobacillus paracasei) isolated from both artisanal fermented beverages were published focusing on their health-promoting properties. Although this is not the predominant species in kefir or water kefir, it may contribute to the health benefits associated to the consumption of the fermented beverage. Since the classification of L. paracasei has been a difficult task, the selection of an adequate method for identification, which is essential to avoid mislabeling in products, publications, and some publicly available DNA sequences, is discussed in the present work. The last findings in health promoting properties of L. paracasei and the bioactive compounds are described and compared to strains isolated from kefir, providing a special focus on exopolysaccharides as effector molecules. The knowledge of the state of the art of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei from kefir and water kefir can help to understand the contribution of these microorganisms to the health benefits of artisanal beverages as well as to discover new probiotic strains for applications in food industry.

12 May 2008 in Journal of Dairy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMarina A Golowczyc
Marina A Golowczyc
MGMaria J Gugliada
Maria J Gugliada
AHAxel Hollmann
Axel Hollmann
LDLucrecia Delfederico
Lucrecia Delfederico
GGGraciela Garrote
Graciela Garrote
GAGraciela De Antoni
Graciela De Antoni
Considering that several health promoting properties are associated with kefir consumption and a reliable probiotic product requires a complete identification of the bacterial species, the present work evaluates several proved markers of probiotic potential of eleven isolates of homofermentative lactobacilli isolated from kefir grains and molecular identification and genotypic diversity. Using restriction analysis of amplified ribosomal DNA (ARDRA) and analysis of the 16S–23S rRNA internal spacer region we confirmed that all homofermentative lactobacilli belong to the speciesLactobacillus plantarum. RAPD-PCR analysis allowed the discrimination of lactobacilli in five clusters. All isolates exhibited high resistance to bile salt. High survival after one hour of exposure to pH 2·5 was observed inLb. plantarumCIDCA 8313, 83210, 8327 and 8338. All isolates were hydrophilic and non autoaggregative. Isolate CIDCA 8337 showed the highest percentage of adhesion among strains. All tested lactobacilli had strong inhibitory power againstSalmonella typhimuriumandEscherichia coli. Seven out of eleven isolates showed inhibition againstSal. entericaand five isolates were effective againstSal. gallinarum. Only CIDCA 8323 and CIDCA 8327 were able to inhibitSal. sonnei. We did not find any correlation between the five clusters based on RAPD-PCR and the probiotic properties, suggesting that these isolates have unique characteristics.

17 April 2012 in Journal of Dairy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAlejandra Londero
Alejandra Londero
MHMaría F. Hamet
María F. Hamet
GAGraciela L. De Antoni
Graciela L. De Antoni
GGGraciela Garrote
Graciela Garrote
Analia G AbrahamAnalia G Abraham
Analia G Abraham
We report here a comparative analysis of the growth, acidification capacity, and chemical and microbiologic composition between kefir grains after 20 subcultures in whey at 20, 30, and 37°C and the original kefir grains coming from milk along with a determination of the microbiological composition of the fermented whey as compared with that of traditional fermented milk.When fermentation was carried out repeatedly at 30 or 37°C, kefir grains changed their kefir-like appearance, exhibited reduced growth rates, had a lower diversity of yeasts and water content, and a higher protein-to-polysaccharide ratio compared with the original kefir grains. In contrast, at 20°C kefir grains could remain in whey for prolonged periods without altering their acidification capacity, growth rate, macroscopic appearance or chemical and microbiologic composition—with the only difference being a reduction in certain yeast populations after 20 subcultures in whey. At this incubation temperature, the presence ofLactobacillus kefiranofaciens, Lb. kefir, Lb. parakefir, Lactococcus lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Saccharomyces unisporus, andSac. cerevisiaewas detected in kefir grains and in fermented whey by denaturing-gradient-gel electrophoresis (DGGE). In whey fermented at 20°C the number of lactic-acid bacteria (LAB) was significantly lower (P<0·05) and the number of yeast significantly higher (P<0·05) than in fermented milk. Since the DGGE profiles were similar for both products, at this temperature the microbiologic composition of fermented whey is similar to that of fermented milk. We therefore suggest a temperature of 20°C to preserve kefir grains as whey-fermentation starters.