Previous studies mention the use of topical acyclovir for the treatment of equine sarcoids. Success rates vary and since the bovine papillomavirus (BPV) lacks the presence of a kinase necessary to activate acyclovir, there is no proof of its activity against equine sarcoids. Twenty-four equine sarcoids were topically treated with acyclovir cream and 25 with a placebo. Both creams were applied twice daily during 6 months. Before the start of the treatment and further on a monthly basis, photographs and swabs were obtained. On the photographs, sarcoid diameter and surface area were measured and verrucosity of the tumours was quantified using a visual analog scale (VAS). The swabs were analysed by PCR for the presence of BPV DNA and positivity rates were calculated as the number of positive swabs divided by the total number of swabs for each treatment group at each time point. Success rates were not significantly different between both treatment groups. There was also no significant effect of treatment on sarcoid diameter, surface area or VAS score. For the swabs, a significantly higher BPV positivity rate was found for acyclovir treated tumours compared to placebo treated sarcoids only after 1 month of treatment and not at other time points. None of the results indicate that treatment with acyclovir yields any better results compared to placebo treatment.

Background Dental disease is a troublesome health concern in alpacas. Specifically, the occurrence of tooth root abscesses has been described in veterinary literature. Nevertheless, no objective prevalence data are available for dental disorders in alpacas. Hypothesis/objectives To determine the prevalence of dental disorders in alpaca herds in Belgium and the Netherlands. To study the associations between the different dental disorders encountered in alpacas. Animals A total of 228 alpacas (Vicugna pacos) originating from 25 farms. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study. Dental disorders were diagnosed by dental examination of sedated animals using a dental mirror or a portable rigid oroscope. Results At the animal level, 82% (n = 187) had dental disorders of which 74.6, 41.7, and 3.9% were cheek teeth, incisor disorders, and canine disorders, respectively. At the level of the cheek teeth, diastemata (43.1%) were most common, followed by wear abnormalities (WA; 39.6%) and periodontal disease (PD; 33.3%). A significant association was detected between the presence of diastemata and PD (odds ratio [OR], 13.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6‐27.7; P < .001). Pulp exposure was significantly associated with the presence of diastemata (OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 3.8‐51.5; P < .001), PD (OR, 8.2; 95% CI, 3.1‐25.3; P < .001) and WA (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2‐7.4; P = .002). Conclusion and Clinical Importance Dental disorders are highly prevalent in alpacas in Belgium and the Netherlands. Several dental disorders in alpacas had significant associations. To prevent the development of advanced stages of dental disease, routine dental examinations are advised to allow early detection and prompt treatment.

In this study, sheep were examined as a potential animal model for immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets using experimental photopolymerisable bioabsorbable polymers. A total of 22 cylindrical implants were placed in fresh mandibular premolar extraction sockets of 7 sheep. Residual bone-implant voids were filled with a biocompatible composite of poly-methyl-methacrylate and poly-hydroxyl-ethyl-methacrylate (Bioplant 24). Photopolymerisation of a viscose mixture of experimental prepolymers and Bioplant 24 applied to the neck of the implants provided additional support before gingival closure. Clinical and radiographic controls were performed 30, 90, and 180 days after surgery. At 180 days postoperatively, the sheep were sacrificed and the mandibular segments were isolated for histological processing. High cumulative implant failure rates of 45.5%, 63.6%, and 77.3% at respectively 30, 90 and 180 days were recorded. Significantly more implants were lost when the position of the neck was located above the level of the alveolar crest (P < 0.05). Clinical and histological observations demonstrated poor implant osseointegration characterized by ingrowth of soft tissue into the extraction sockets. Bone substitutes were lost in all cases. Sheep have many practical advantages compared with other animal models. However, their specific oral biomechanics inherent to their constant ruminant activity accounted for a high degree of the reported implant failures. Important adaptations to the implantation technique and postoperative management will be necessary to use sheep as an animal model for future oral implant related experiments.