Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar

Dr. Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2017 in Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDavid A. Hodell
David A. Hodell
JNJoseph A. Nicholl
Joseph A. Nicholl
TBTomaso Bontognali
Tomaso Bontognali
SDSteffan Danino
Steffan Danino
JDJavier Dorador
Javier Dorador
URUrsula Röhl
Ursula Röhl
X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) core scanning and X‐ray computed tomography data were measured every 1 mm to study the structure of Heinrich Event 1 during the last deglaciation at International Ocean Discovery Program Site U1308. Heinrich Layer 1 comprises two distinct layers of ice‐rafted detritus (IRD), which are rich in detrital carbonate (DC) and poor in foraminifera. Each DC layer consists of poorly sorted, coarse‐grained clasts of IRD embedded in a dense, fine‐grained matrix of glacial rock flour that is partially cemented. The radiocarbon ages of foraminifera at the base of the two layers indicate a difference of 1400 14C years, suggesting that they are two distinct events, but the calendar ages depend upon assumptions made for surface reservoir ages. The double peak indicates at least two distinct stages of discharge of the ice streams that drained the Laurentide Ice Sheet through Hudson Strait during HE1 or, alternatively, the discharge of two independent ice streams containing detrital carbonate. Heinrich Event 1.1 was the larger of the two events and began at ~16.2 ka (15.5–17.1 ka) when the polar North Atlantic was already cold and Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) weakened. The younger peak (H1.2) at ~15.1 ka (14.3 to 15.9 ka) was a weaker event than H1.1 that was accompanied by minor cooling. Our results support a complex history for Heinrich Stadial 1 (HS1) with reduction in AMOC during the early part (~20–16.2 ka) possibly driven by melting of European ice sheets, whereas the Laurentide Ice Sheet assumed a greater role during the latter half (~16.2–14.7 ka).

1 May 2008 in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matías Reolid PérezMatías Reolid Pérez
Matías Reolid Pérez
FRFrancisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
JNJenö Nagy
Jenö Nagy
FOFederico Olóriz
Federico Olóriz

1 January 2005 in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gonzalo Jiménez-MorenoGonzalo Jiménez-Moreno
Gonzalo Jiménez-Moreno
FRFrancisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
EPEulogio Pardo-Igúzquiza
Eulogio Pardo-Igúzquiza
SFSéverine Fauquette
Séverine Fauquette
JSJean-Pierre Suc
Jean-Pierre Suc
PMPál Müller
Pál Müller

10 August 2012 in Geological Society of America Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matías Reolid PérezMatías Reolid Pérez
Matías Reolid Pérez
FRFrancisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
AMA. Marok
A. Marok
ASA. Sebane
A. Sebane

1 May 2014 in Chemical Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FJF.J. Jiménez-Espejo
F.J. Jiménez-Espejo
AGA. García-Alix
A. García-Alix
Gonzalo Jiménez-MorenoGonzalo Jiménez-Moreno
Gonzalo Jiménez-Moreno
MRM. Rodrigo-Gámiz
M. Rodrigo-Gámiz
RAR.S. Anderson
R.S. Anderson
EPE. Pardo-Igúzquiza
E. Pardo-Igúzquiza

1 December 2008 in Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Matías Reolid PérezMatías Reolid Pérez
Matías Reolid Pérez
JNJenö Nagy
Jenö Nagy
FRFrancisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
FOFederico Olóriz
Federico Olóriz
Foraminiferal assemblages from the neritic environment reveal the palaeoecological impact of nutrient types in relation to shore distance and sedimentary setting. Comparatively proximal siliciclastic settings from the Boreal Domain (Brora section, Eastern Scotland) were dominated by inner???shelf primary production in the water column or in sea bottom, while in relatively seawards mixed carbonate???siliciclastic settings from the Western Tethys (Prebetic, Southern Spain), nutrients mainly derived from the inner???shelf source. In both settings, benthic foraminiferal assemblages increased in diversity and proportion of epifauna from eutrophic to oligotrophic conditions. The proximal setting example (Brora Brick Clay Mb.) corresponds to Callovian offshore shelf deposits with a high primary productivity, bottom accumulation of organic matter, and a reduced sedimentation rate for siliciclastics. Eutrophic conditions favoured some infaunal foraminifera. Lately, inner shelf to shoreface transition areas (Fascally Siltstone Mb.), show higher sedimentation rates and turbidity, reducing euphotic???zone range depths and primary production, and then deposits with a lower organic matter content (high???mesotrophic conditions). This determined less agglutinated infaunal foraminifera content and increasing calcitic and aragonitic epifauna, and calcitic opportunists (i.e., Lenticulina). The comparatively distal setting of the Oxfordian example (Prebetic) corresponds to: (i) outer???shelf areas with lower nutrient input (relative oligotrophy) and organic matter accumulation on comparatively firmer substrates (lumpy lithofacies group) showing dominance of calcitic epifaunal foraminifera, and (ii) mid???shelf areas with a higher sedimentation rate and nutrient influx (low???mesotrophic conditions) favouring potentially deep infaunal foraminifers in comparatively unconsolidated and nutrient???rich substrates controlled by instable redox boundary (marl???limestone rhythmite lithofacies)