Camostat mesylate is expected to be promising as a treatment option for COVID-19, in addition to other indications for which it is currently used. Furthermore, in vitro experiments have confirmed the potential of camostat and its metabolites to be effective against COVID-19. Therefore, clinical trials were conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic characteristics of camostat after single-dose administration. Additionally, we aim to predict the pharmacokinetics of repeated dosing through modeling and simulation based on clinical trials. Clinical trials were conducted on healthy Korean adults, and an analysis was carried out of the metabolites of camostat, GBPA, and GBA. Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation were performed using Monolix. There were no safety issues (AEs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, and ECG) during the clinical trial. The pharmacokinetic characteristics at various doses were identified. It was confirmed that AUC _last and C_max increased in proportion to dose in both GBPA and GBA, and linearity was also confirmed in log-transformed power model regression. Additionally, the accumulation index was predicted (1.12 and 1.08 for GBPA and GBA). The pharmacokinetics of camostat for various dose administrations and indications can be predicted prior to clinical trials using the developed camostat model. Furthermore, it can be used for various indications by connecting it with pharmacodynamic information.

Donepezil patch was developed to replace the original oral formulation. To accurately describe the pharmacokinetics of donepezil and investigate compatible doses between two formulations, a population pharmacokinetic model for oral and transdermal patches was built based on a clinical study. Plasma donepezil levels were analyzed via liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Non-compartmental analyses were performed to derive the initial parameters for compartmental analyses. Compartmental analysis (CA) was performed with NLME software NONMEM assisted by Perl-speaks-NONMEM, and R. Model evaluation was proceeded via visual predictive checks (VPC), goodness-of-fit (GOF) plotting, and bootstrap method. The bioequivalence test was based on a 2 × 2 crossover design, and parameters of AUC and C_max were considered. We found that a two-compartment model featuring two transit compartments accurately describes the pharmacokinetics of nine subjects administered in oral, as well as of the patch-dosed subjects. Through evaluation, the model was proven to be sufficiently accurate and suitable for further bioequivalence tests. Based on the bioequivalence test, 114 mg/101.3 cm²–146 mg/129.8 cm² of donepezil patch per week was equivalent to 10 mg PO donepezil per day. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetic model was successfully developed, and acceptable parameters were estimated. However, the size calculated by an equivalent dose of donepezil patch could be rather large. Further optimization in formulation needs to be performed to find appropriate usability in clinical situations.