With an aging society, osteoporosis is one of the most common diseases threatening the health of China’s elderly population and is an issue that is raising increasing concern. Osteoporosis is characterized by bone loss and increased susceptibility to fragility fractures. Various imaging modalities such as X-ray, CT, MRI and nuclear medicine along with assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) play an important role in its diagnosis and management, and the treatment requires multidisciplinary teamwork. A lack of consensus in the approach to imaging and BMD measurement is hampering the quality of service and patient care in China. Therefore a panel of Chinese experts from the fields of radiology, orthopedics, endocrinology and nuclear medicine reviewed the international guidelines, consensus and literature with the most recent data from China and, taking account of current clinical practice in China, the panel reached this consensus to help guide the diagnosis of osteoporosis using imaging and BMD. This consensus report provides guidelines and standards for the imaging and BMD assessment of osteoporosis and criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in China.

Background: Acute vertebral fracture is usually caused by low-energy injury with osteoporosis and high-energy trauma. The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system (AO classification) plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. The diagnosis and description of vertebral fractures according to the classification scheme requires a great deal of time and energy for radiologists.Purpose: To design and validate a multistage deep learning system (multistage AO system) for the automatic detection, localization and classification of acute thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures according to AO classification on computed tomography.Materials and Methods: The CT images of 1,217 patients who came to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were collected retrospectively. The fractures were marked and classified by 2 junior radiology residents according to the type A standard in the AO classification. Marked fracture sites included the upper endplate, lower endplate and posterior wall. When there were inconsistent opinions on classification labels, the final result was determined by a director radiologist. We integrated different networks into different stages of the overall framework. U-net and a graph convolutional neural network (U-GCN) are used to realize the location and classification of the thoracolumbar spine. Next, a classification network is used to detect whether the thoracolumbar spine has a fracture. In the third stage, we detect fractures in different parts of the thoracolumbar spine by using a multibranch output network and finally obtain the AO types.Results: The mean age of the patients was 61.87 years with a standard deviation of 17.04 years, consisting of 760 female patients and 457 male patients. On vertebrae level, sensitivity for fracture detection was 95.23% in test dataset, with an accuracy of 97.93% and a specificity of 98.35%. For the classification of vertebral body fractures, the balanced accuracy was 79.56%, with an AUC of 0.904 for type A1, 0.945 for type A2, 0.878 for type A3 and 0.942 for type A4.Conclusion: The multistage AO system can automatically detect and classify acute vertebral body fractures in the thoracolumbar spine on CT images according to AO classification with high accuracy.

Objectives: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of carotid dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). Methods: Carotid DECTA datasets of 28 consecutive patients were reconstructed at 50 keV using DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H) and 80% ASIR-V algorithms. Mean attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at different levels of arteries were measured and calculated. Image quality for noise and texture, depiction of arteries, and diagnostic performance toward carotid plaques were assessed subjectively by two radiologists. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared between the ASIR-V, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H groups. Results: The image noise at aorta and common carotid artery, SNR, and CNR at all level arteries of DLIR-H images were significantly higher than those of ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.040). The quantitative analysis of DLIR-L and DLIR-M showed comparable denoise capability with ASIR-V. The overall image quality (p = 0.000) and image noise (p = 0.000–0.014) were significantly better in the DLIR-M and DLIR-H images. The image texture was improved by DLR at all level compared to ASIR-V images (p = 0.000–0.008). Depictions of head and neck arteries and diagnostic performance were comparable between four groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Compared with 80% ASIR-V, we recommend DLIR-H for clinical carotid DECTA reconstruction, which can significantly improve the image quality of carotid DECTA at 50 keV but maintain a desirable diagnostic performance and arterial depiction.