A gap in knowledge about current splinting practice exists between the educational program and clinical service. To bridge this gap, we investigated the perspectives and experiences of Thai occupational therapists regarding contemporary hand splinting practices in clinical use. A mixed-method study was designed. An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. In the first quantitative phase, a survey questionnaire was mailed to occupational therapists. The questions were regarding contemporary hand splinting practices in clinical use at seven hospitals in the capital city of Bangkok and outskirt areas. In the second phase, semi-structured interviews were completed to explore expert occupational therapists’ perspectives on practice in the same hospital settings. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results showed that most conditions receiving splints were nerve injuries, orthopedics, and stroke, which represented the service frequency of splint types: functional resting (100%), cock-up (93.3%), and thumb spica splints (80%). Bone and joint deformity prevention ranked first with muscle contracture prevention being ranked second, and the third-ranked was maintaining range of motion. Three themes emerged from the interviews: starting with the patient condition; effective function and value; knowledge and experiential skills. Perspectives and experiences of occupational therapists in splinting practice contribute to education based on the reality of practice. Integrated numerical and textual data of professional skills and knowledge in actual splinting practice can be reflected through splints and orthoses program revisions to meet future learning outcomes.

Objectives: The present study aims to investigate the effects of the participatory ergonomics (PE) program on reducing the ergonomic risk factors and increasing the work performance among the aging workers who work as ginger peelers in the Wat Puranawas community in Thailand. Material and...

Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common condition in the older person and can lead to serious complications. In Thailand, there is currently no standardized dysphagia screening tool for gathering preliminary information about clients for early evaluation and intervention. Objective: This study aimed to develop a dysphagia risk screening tool for older persons and investigate its psychometric properties. This study examined the content validity, criterion validity, and test-retest of the Geriatric Dysphagia Risk Screening Tool (GDRST). Materials and methods: 26 questions were developed from literature review and expert opinion. Five expert occupational therapists examined content validity. The Index of Congruence (IOC) was calculated from five experts, and the items that showed IOC scores of over 0.5 were incorporated into the target screening tool. Thirty older adults who had a risk of dysphagia (Mean±SD, 66.13±4.66 years) participated in the study. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the test-retest reliability of the screening tool. The criterion validity of the GDRST was evaluated by investigating the relationships between a score of the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Swallowing Quality Assessment Form for Occupational Therapists (SQAOT) using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results: Based on the literature review and occupational therapy expert opinions, the screening tool covers three domains, including the cognition domain, oral phase swallowing ability domain, and pharyngeal phase swallowing ability domain. Content validity IOC scores were between 0.6 and 1.0 for all items. The internal consistency of the GDRST was high, with 0.971 Cronbach’s alpha for the test. The screening tool had excellent test-retest reliability on all items (p<0.05). The score of the GDRST was significantly correlated with the score of FOIS (r=-0.468, p=0.009), and SQAOT (r=-0.705, p=0.000). Conclusion: The GDRST demonstrated excellent reliability and validity against the clinical assessment. It was simple to administer and could be beneficial for screening older people in the community for dysphagia.