A single electro-optical (EO) sensor used in space debris observation provides angle-only information. However, space debris position can be derived using simultaneous optical measurements obtained from two EO sensors located at two separate observation sites, and this is commonly known as triangulation. In this paper, we propose a new triangulation algorithm to determine space debris position, and its analytical expression of Root-Mean-Square (RMS) position error is presented. The simulation of two-site observation is conducted to compare the RMS positioning error of the proposed triangulation algorithm with traditional triangulation algorithms. The results show that the maximum RMS position error of the proposed triangulation algorithm is not more than 200 m, the proposed triangulation algorithm has higher positioning accuracy than traditional triangulation algorithms, and the RMS position error obtained in the simulation is nearly consistent with the analytical expression of RMS position error. In addition, initial orbit determination (IOD) is carried out by using the triangulation positioning data, and the results show that the IOD accuracy of two-site observation is significantly higher than that of the single-site observation.

Initial orbit determination (IOD), as a basis for initial orbit association and accurate orbit determination (OD), has a crucial role in the process of obtaining space debris orbit information. Among the traditional methods, the Gooding method has better convergence and stability. In this study, the Gooding method is enhanced to solve the issues discovered. A novel initial orbit determination (IOD) method is developed using the proposed improvement measures of the single-parameter initial value determination (SIVD) method, the fitted-curve noise suppression method, the restricted corrective value solution method, the removal of trivial solutions, etc. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of the improved method. The success rate of the initial orbit determination reached 99%, and the accuracy of the solved orbit parameters was significantly improved, especially the semi-major axis (SMA) error of less than 50 km, accounting for 88% of the total. It can be seen that the method meets the demand of space-based space debris cataloging for initial orbit association and can serve in the field of space situational awareness, which has important practical significance and application potential.

Atmospheric drag is an important factor affecting orbit determination and prediction of low-orbit space debris. To obtain accurate ballistic coefficients of space debris, we propose a calculation method based on measured optical angles. Angle measurements of space debris with a perigee height below 1400 km acquired from a photoelectric array were used for orbit determination. Perturbation equations of atmospheric drag were used to calculate the semi-major-axis variation. The ballistic coefficients of space debris were estimated and compared with those published by the North American Aerospace Defense Command in terms of orbit prediction error. The 48 h orbit prediction error of the ballistic coefficients obtained from the proposed method is reduced by 18.65% compared with the published error. Hence, our method seems suitable for calculating space debris ballistic coefficients and supporting related practical applications.

Atmospheric drag is an important influencing factor in precise orbit determination and the prediction of low-orbit space debris. It has received widespread attention. Currently, calculating atmospheric drag mainly relies on different atmospheric density models. This experiment was designed to explore the impact of different atmospheric density models on the orbit prediction of space debris. In the experiment, satellite laser ranging data published by the ILRS (International Laser Ranging Service) were used as the basis for the precise orbit determination for space debris. The prediction error of space debris orbits at different orbital heights using different atmospheric density models was used as a criterion to evaluate the impact of atmospheric density models on the determination of space-target orbits. Eight atmospheric density models, DTM78, DTM94, DTM2000, J71, RJ71, JB2006, MSIS86, and NRLMSISE00, were compared in the experiment. The experimental results indicated that the DTM2000 atmospheric density model is best for determining and predicting the orbits of LEO (low-Earth-orbit) targets.

The authors would like to make the following corrections to this paper