Fungi are mostly sessile organisms, and thus have evolved ways to cope with environmental changes. Many fungi produce ‘dormant’ structures, which all

This article is part of the Top 10 Unanswered Questions in MPMI invited review series.The past few decades have seen major discoveries in the field of molecular plant-microbe interactions. As the result of technological and intellectual advances, we are now able to answer questions at a level of mechanistic detail that we could not have imagined possible 20 years ago. The MPMI Editorial Board felt it was time to take stock and reassess. What big questions remain unanswered? We knew that to identify the fundamental, overarching questions that drive our research, we needed to do this as a community. To reach a diverse audience of people with different backgrounds and perspectives, working in different areas of plant-microbe interactions, we queried the more than 1,400 participants at the 2019 International Congress on Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions meeting in Glasgow. This group effort resulted in a list of ten, broad-reaching, fundamental questions that influence and inform our research. Here, we introduce these Top 10 unanswered questions, giving context and a brief description of the issues. Each of these questions will be the subject of a detailed review in the coming months. We hope that this process of reflecting on what is known and unknown and identifying the themes that underlie our research will provide a framework to use going forward, giving newcomers a sense of the mystery of the big questions and inspiring new avenues and novel insights.[ ] Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license .

Sarocladium zeae is a fungal endophyte of maize and can be found co-inhabiting a single seed with Fusarium verticillioides, a major mycotoxigenic food safety threat. S. zeae produces pyrrocidines A and B that inhibit the growth of F. verticillioides and may limit its spread within the seed to locations lacking S. zeae. Although coinhabiting single seeds, the fungi are generally segregated in separate tissues. To understand F. verticillioides’ protective physiological response to pyrrocidines we sequenced the F. verticillioides transcriptome upon exposure to purified pyrrocidine A or B at sub-inhibitory concentrations. Through this work we identified a F. verticillioides locus FvABC3 (FVEG_11089) encoding a transporter critical for resistance to pyrrocidine. We also identified FvZBD1 (FVEG_00314), a gene directly adjacent to the fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster that was induced several thousand-fold in response to pyrrocidines. FvZBD1 is postulated to act as a genetic repressor of fumonisin production since deletion of the gene resulted in orders of magnitude increase in fumonisin. Further, pyrrocidine acts, likely through FvZBD1, to shut off fumonisin biosynthesis. This suggests that S. zeae is able to hack the secondary metabolic program of a competitor fungus, perhaps as preemptive self-protection, in this case impacting a mycotoxin of central concern for food safety. The fungal food safety threat, Fusarium verticillioides—producer of the deadly fumonisin mycotoxins, is a seed borne pathogen of corn. Another fungus, Sarocladium zeae, also lives in corn seed. S. zeae produces compounds called pyrrocidines that inhibit the growth of F. verticillioides. Here we describe the F. verticillioides transcriptional response upon exposure to pyrrocidines. By making deletion mutants in highly upregulated genes we determined the gene crucial for F. verticillioides resistance to pyrrocidine. Another gene, which was the most highly upregulated, suppresses fumonisin production. Additionally, we found that pyrrocidine effectively eliminates fumonisin production in wild F. verticillioides. This provides potential strategies for development of biological and/or chemical control to eliminate fumonisin contamination of food and feed.

Mycotoxin contaminated corn poses a risk to poultry production. Although mycotoxin regulatory guidelines are based on the hazards of individual mycotoxin contamination, feed and feed ingredients may be contaminated with multiple mycotoxins. The objective of this study was to assess mycotoxin co-contamination and its impact on the nutrient content of corn grain. Corn samples (n = 328) originating from various regions in the Southeastern U.S. were quantitatively analyzed for fumonisin (FUM), deoxynivalenol (DON), aflatoxin (AFB1) and zearalenone (ZEA) by HPLC-MS/MS. Nutritional content was analyzed by near-infrared spectroscopy, and color data were collected. All 328 samples were found to be contaminated with at least 1 mycotoxin: 100% contained FUM (19-24,680 µg/kg), 69.82% contained DON (0-9,640 µg/kg), 17.07% contained AFB1 (0-939 µg/kg), and 43.60% had detectable levels of ZEA (0-8,093.5 µg/kg). Most of the samples were contaminated with 2 or more mycotoxins, with only 18.29% of the samples containing a single mycotoxin. 38.41% of the samples had 2 mycotoxins present, 36.59 % had 3 mycotoxins, and 4.88% of the samples had all 4 tested mycotoxins present. Samples contaminated with AFB1 had significantly lower fat (P = 0.007) and lightness (P = 0.007); samples contaminated with DON had significantly higher starch (P < 0.001) and lower protein (P < 0.001). Samples contaminated with FUM had significantly higher protein (P = 0.008) and moisture (P = 0.019) and lower starch (P < 0.001). ZEA contaminated samples had significantly lower starch (P = 0.034). A correlation was observed between mycotoxin contamination and altered nutrient content in corn. This study provides further evidence that co-contamination of mycotoxins is the norm in corn, and that mycotoxin contamination correlates with impacts on the nutrient profile of feed corn.