Frank Baganz

Dr. Frank Baganz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 1998 in Trends in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SOS G Oliver
S G Oliver
MWM K Winson
M K Winson
DKDouglas Kell
Douglas Kell
FBFrank Baganz
Frank Baganz

1 January 2006 in Microbial Cell Factories
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJonathan I Betts
Jonathan I Betts
FBFrank Baganz
Frank Baganz
This review focuses on the emerging field of miniature bioreactors (MBRs), and examines the way in which they are used to speed up many areas of bioprocessing. MBRs aim to achieve this acceleration as a result of their inherent high-throughput capability, which results from their ability to perform many cell cultivations in parallel. There are several applications for MBRs, ranging from media development and strain improvement to process optimisation. The potential of MBRs for use in these applications will be explained in detail in this review. MBRs are currently based on several existing bioreactor platforms such as shaken devices, stirred-tank reactors and bubble columns. This review will present the advantages and disadvantages of each design together with an appraisal of prototype and commercialised devices developed for parallel operation. Finally we will discuss how MBRs can be used in conjunction with automated robotic systems and other miniature process units to deliver a fully-integrated, high-throughput (HT) solution for cell cultivation process development.

1 February 2013 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YXYanan Xu
Yanan Xu
Saul PurtonSaul Purton
Saul Purton
FBFrank Baganz
Frank Baganz

1 May 2006 in Chemical Engineering Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMM. Micheletti
M. Micheletti
TBT. Barrett
T. Barrett
SDS.D. Doig
S.D. Doig
FBFrank Baganz
Frank Baganz
MLM.S. Levy
M.S. Levy
GLGary Lye
Gary Lye

1 January 2003 in Trends in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGary Lye
Gary Lye
PAParviz Ayazi-Shamlou
Parviz Ayazi-Shamlou
FBFrank Baganz
Frank Baganz
PDPaul A. Dalby
Paul A. Dalby
John M. WoodleyJohn M. Woodley
John M. Woodley

1 January 2014 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALA.M. Lizzul
A.M. Lizzul
PHPaul Hellier
Paul Hellier
SPS. Purton
S. Purton
FBFrank Baganz
Frank Baganz
NLN. Ladommatos
N. Ladommatos
Luiza C. CamposLuiza C. Campos
Luiza C. Campos
Substitution of conventional feedstock with waste based alternatives is one route towards both remediation and reducing costs associated with production of algal biomass. This work explores whether exhaust gases and wastewater can replace conventional feedstock in the production of biomass from Chlorella sorokiniana. Exhaust gases were used to augment production in final effluent, anaerobic digester centrate or in standard medium. Cultures were grown in 1L bottles under illumination of 80 μmol m(-2) s(-1). The results showed an average μmax ranging between 0.04 and 0.07 h(-1), whilst the final biomass yield in different media ranged between 220 and 330 mg L(-1). Lipid yield was increased over time to 31 mg L(-1). CO2 addition resulted in complete nitrogen removal between 48 and 96 h in both final effluent and centrate. The results also indicated that levels of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gases can be reduced by between 20% and 95%.