Growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer is closely connected to the biosynthetic capacity of tumor cells, and colorectal cancer stem cells that reside at the top of the intratumoral hierarchy are especially dependent on this feature. By performing disease modeling on patient-derived tumor organoids, we found that elevated expression of the ribosome biogenesis factor NLE1 occurs upon SMAD4 loss in TGFβ1-exposed colorectal cancer organoids. TGFβ signaling-mediated downregulation of NLE1 was prevented by ectopic expression of c-MYC, which occupied an E-box–containing region within the NLE1 promoter. Elevated levels of NLE1 were found in colorectal cancer cohorts compared with normal tissues and in colorectal cancer subtypes characterized by Wnt/MYC and intestinal stem cell gene expression. In colorectal cancer cells and organoids, NLE1 was limiting for de novo protein biosynthesis. Upon NLE1 ablation, colorectal cancer cell lines activated p38/MAPK signaling, accumulated p62- and LC3-positive structures indicative of impaired autophagy, and displayed more reactive oxygen species. Phenotypically, knockout of NLE1 inhibit.ed proliferation, migration and invasion, clonogenicity, and anchorage-independent growth. NLE1 loss also increased the fraction of apoptotic tumor cells, and deletion of TP53 further sensitized NLE1-deficient colorectal cancer cells to apoptosis. In an endoscopy-guided orthotopic mouse transplantation model, ablation of NLE1 impaired tumor growth in the colon and reduced primary tumor-derived liver metastasis. In patients with colorectal cancer, NLE1 mRNA levels predicted overall and relapse-free survival. Taken together, these data reveal a critical role of NLE1 in colorectal cancer growth and progression and suggest that NLE1 represents a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer patients. Significance: NLE1 limits de novo protein biosynthesis and the tumorigenic potential of advanced colorectal cancer cells, suggesting NLE1 could be targeted to improve the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is frequently expressed in pulmonary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target. However, limited data on DLL3 expression in other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), such as extrapulmonary SCNEC, large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC), mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), and pulmonary carcinoids, impedes an estimation if other types of NEN might be suitable candidates for anti-DLL3 therapies. We evaluated DLL3 expression in 1294 NEN and 479 non-neuroendocrine carcinomas, correlating the findings with histological subtypes, tumour localisation, and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, we explored the concordance of DLL3 expression during metastatic progression in 67 paired primary NEN and metastases. DLL3 expression was significantly higher in NEC (64.0%) compared to GEP-NET and pulmonary carcinoids (10.1%, p < 0.001), particularly in SCNEC (80.4%), followed by LCNEC (62.6%) and MiNEN (28.6%). DLL3 was common in pulmonary carcinoids (41.5%), but rare in GEP-NET (5.1%) and non-neuroendocrine carcinomas (1.3%). Overall DLL3 expression was highly concordant between metastases and corresponding primary NEN (92.5%, p < 0.001). In univariable analyses, DLL3-expressing pulmonary carcinoids ( p = 0.005) and GEP-NET ( p = 0.018) were associated with decreased OS, but this was not retained in multivariable analyses adjusting for stage and grade ( p = n. s.). No prognostic impact was observed in pulmonary ( p = 0.708) or GEP-NEC ( p = 0.87). Our study highlights significant differences in DLL3 expression across NEN subtypes and localisations, with largely concordant expression in metastases. DLL3-based therapies may be effective in many NEC and pulmonary carcinoids, while DLL3 appears to be a minor therapeutic target for GEP-NET and non-neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Background: Immunohistochemical loss of CDX2 has been proposed as a biomarker of dismal survival in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in UICC Stage II/III. However, it remains unclear, how CDX2 expression is related to central hematoxylin–eosin (HE)-based morphologic parameters defined by 2019 WHO classification and how its prognostic relevance is compared to these parameters.Methods: We evaluated CDX2 expression in 1003 CRCs and explored its prognostic relevance compared to CRC subtypes, tumour budding and WHO grade in the overall cohort and in specific subgroups.Results: CDX2-low/absent CRCs were enriched in specific morphologic subtypes, right-sided and microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) CRCs (P < 0.001) and showed worse survival characteristics in the overall cohort/UICC Stage II/III (e.g. DFS:P = 0.005) and in microsatellite stable and left-sided CRCs, but not in MSI-H or right-sided CRCs. Compared with CDX2, all HE-based markers showed a significantly better prognostic discrimination in all scenarios. In multivariate analyses including all morphologic parameters, CDX2 was not an independent prognostic factor.Conclusion: CDX2 loss has some prognostic impact in univariate analyses, but its prognostic relevance is considerably lower compared to central HE-based morphologic parameters defined by the WHO classification and vanishes in multivariate analyses incorporating these factors.