Background: Telehealth services are widely used in Saudi Arabia. Despite this, neither the use rate nor the attitudes, perceptions, and barriers concerning telehealth applications have been evaluated nationally from the perspective of healthcare providers (HCPs). Aim: This study aims to explore the use rate of telehealth, as well as the attitudes, perceptions, and barriers concerning telehealth use in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of HCPs. Methods and design: A cross-sectional survey was conducted and distributed to all HCPs between 16 November 2021 and 16 March 2022, through an online platform (Survey Monkey). Results: Overall, 1034 HCPs completed the online survey, of which 65.0% (n = 677) were male. Physicians accounted for 22.34%, while nurses and respiratory therapists accounted for 22.34% and 21.47%, respectively. Only 491 HCPs (47%) have used telehealth applications, the majority for less than a year (21.47%) or from one to three years (14.51%). Around 44% of HCPs perceived telehealth as being useful in quality and care delivery. Around 43% of HCPs felt comfortable using telehealth, and 45.45% perceived telehealth as being useful for patients with transportation difficulties. Additionally, 38% believed that telehealth provides a confidential way of protecting patients’ information, and 36% would like to receive more training in telehealth. Speech-language therapists and public health professionals were the highest HCP users (98% and 95%, respectively), while general physicians and dentists were the lowest users (44% and 55%, respectively). Lack of time or a busy schedule was the most common barrier to not using telehealth among all HCPs (38%). Conclusion: The use of telehealth was perceived as being positive as well as valuable and confidential in monitoring and providing care. However, challenges such as the lack of time or a busy schedule impeded the use of telehealth among HCPs in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary patient-tailored intervention that aims to improve the physical and psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory diseases. Providing pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) services to the growing population of patients is challenging due to shortages in health care practitioners and pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Telerehabilitation has the potential to address this shortage in practitioners and PR programs as well as improve patients’ participation and adherence. This study’s purpose was to identify and evaluate the influences of intention of health care practitioners to use telerehabilitation. Methods: Data were collected through a self-administered Internet-based survey. Results: Surveys were completed by 222 health care practitioners working in pulmonary rehabilitation with 79% having a positive intention to use telerehabilitation. Specifically, perceived usefulness was a significant individual predictor of positive intentions to use telerehabilitation. Conclusion: Perceived usefulness may be an important factor associated with health care providers’ intent to use telerehabilitation for pulmonary rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Using telehealth in pulmonary rehabilitation (telerehabilitation) is a new field of health-care practice. To successfully implement a telerehabilitation program, measures of acceptance of this new type of program need to be assessed among potential users. The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to measure acceptance of using telerehabilitation by health-care practitioners and patients. METHODS: Three objectives were met (a) constructing a modified scale of the technology acceptance model, (b) judging the items for content validity, and (c) judging the scale for face validity. Nine experts agreed to participate and evaluate item relevance to theoretical definitions of domains. To establish face validity, 7 health-care practitioners and 5 patients were interviewed to provide feedback about the scale's clarity and ease of reading. RESULTS: The final items were divided into 2 scales that reflected the health-care practitioner and patient responses. Each scale included 3 subscales: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 scales, each with 3 subscales, exhibited evidence of content validity and face validity. The 17-item telerehabilitation acceptance scale for health-care practitioners and the 13-item telerehabilitation acceptance scale among patients warrant further psychometric testing as valuable measures for pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an interdisciplinary intervention designed to improve the physical status and the psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory diseases. To improve patients' participation in PR programs, telerehabilitation has been introduced. Objective: This study aimed to identify factors that could influence the intention to use telerehabilitation among patients attending traditional PR programs. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited subjects attending the PR centers in the hospitals of the Indiana State University, United States of America, between January and May 2017. Data were collected using self-administered Tele-Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale (TPRAS). TPRAS had two subscales: perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Behavioral intention (BI) was the dependent variable, and all responses were dichotomized into positive and negative intention to use. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to assess the influence of variables on the intention to use telerehabilitation. Results: A total of 134 respondents were included in this study, of which 61.2% indicated positive intention to use telerehabilitation. Perceived usefulness was a significant predictor of the positive intentions to use of telerehabilitation. Duration of respiratory disease was negatively associated with the use of telerehabilitation. Conclusion: Perceived usefulness was a significant predictor of using telerehabilitation. The findings of this study may be useful for health-care organizations in improving the adoption of telerehabilitation or in its implementation. Future telerehabilitation acceptance studies could explore the effects of additional factors including computer literacy and culture on the intention to use telerehabilitation.

Introduction: Telehealth offers several advantages over traditional in-person clinic visits. Despite its potential benefits, some barriers affect the optimal use of telehealth. Understanding healthcare practitioners' (HCPs) acceptance of telehealth is essential to ensure the successful, high-quality, and safe implementation of telehealth programs. However, a comprehensive, theory-driven understanding of the factors influencing HCPs' acceptance of telehealth in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is lacking, hindering the development of effective implementation strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to measure telehealth acceptance among HCPs in the KSA and to identify the key predictors of their intention to use it, with a specific focus on constructs derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Methods: This study was conducted from June 2024 to January 2025. HCPs working in the KSA were included. The survey was grounded in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and consisted of four constructs: performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC). In addition to behavioral intention (BI) as the dependent variable. The data analysis included performing descriptive analysis for the sociodemographic variables and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 1,051 HCPs completed the survey. The analysis indicated that 97.8% of respondents expressed a positive intention to use telehealth in the future. Performance expectancy (PE) emerged as a significant predictor of the intention to use telehealth [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.45, p < 0.05], as did social influence (SI) (AOR = 19.25.2, p < 0.01). Furthermore, employment in military or private hospitals was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of intending to use telehealth (AOR = 0.05, p < 0.05 and AOR = 0.07, p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: This study represents the first large-scale, theory-driven investigation of telehealth acceptance among healthcare practitioners (HCPs) across all regions of the KSA. The findings underscore the critical role of performance expectancy (PE) and social influence (SI) as significant predictors of HCPs' intention to adopt telehealth services. These insights provide valuable direction for policymakers and healthcare leaders, emphasizing the importance of fostering supportive professional environments and highlighting perceived benefits to enhance telehealth adoption. To address concerns related to effort expectancy and the facilitating conditions, telehealth developers should prioritize user-friendly designs and provide accessible and responsive IT support for users.