Alessandro Castiglione

Dr. Alessandro Castiglione

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 November 2016 in Audiology and Neurotology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAlessandro Castiglione
Alessandro Castiglione
ABAlice Benatti
Alice Benatti
CVCarmelita Velardita
Carmelita Velardita
DFDiego Favaro
Diego Favaro
EPElisa Padoan
Elisa Padoan
Alessandro MartiniAlessandro Martini
Alessandro Martini
A growing interest in cognitive effects associated with speech and hearing processes is spreading throughout the scientific community essentially guided by evidence that central and peripheral hearing loss is associated with cognitive decline. For the present research, 125 participants older than 65 years of age (105 with hearing impairment and 20 with normal hearing) were enrolled, divided into 6 groups according to their degree of hearing loss and assessed to determine the effects of the treatment applied. Patients in our research program routinely undergo an extensive audiological and cognitive evaluation protocol providing results from the Digit Span test, Stroop color-word test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Geriatric Depression Scale, before and after rehabilitation. Data analysis was performed for a cross-sectional and longitudinal study of the outcomes for the different treatment groups. Each group demonstrated improvement after auditory rehabilitation or training on short- and long-term memory tasks, level of depression and cognitive status scores. Auditory rehabilitation by cochlear implants or hearing aids is effective also among older adults (median age of 74 years) with different degrees of hearing loss, and enables positive improvements in terms of social isolation, depression and cognitive performance.

11 January 2022 in Audiology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAlessandro Castiglione
Alessandro Castiglione
CMClaes Möller
Claes Möller
Usher syndrome (USH) is the most common genetic condition responsible for combined loss of hearing and vision. Balance disorders and bilateral vestibular areflexia are also observed in some cases. The syndrome was first described by Albrecht von Graefe in 1858, but later named by Charles Usher, who presented a large number of cases with hearing loss and retinopathy in 1914. USH has been grouped into three main clinical types: 1, 2, and 3, which are caused by mutations in different genes and are further divided into different subtypes. To date, nine causative genes have been identified and confirmed as responsible for the syndrome when mutated: MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15, and USH1G (SANS) for Usher type 1; USH2A, ADGRV1, and WHRN for Usher type 2; CLRN1 for Usher type 3. USH is inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern. Digenic, bi-allelic, and polygenic forms have also been reported, in addition to dominant or nonsyndromic forms of genetic mutations. This narrative review reports the causative forms, diagnosis, prognosis, epidemiology, rehabilitation, research, and new treatments of USH.

1 January 2014 in Audiology and Neurotology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessandro MartiniAlessandro Martini
Alessandro Martini
ACAlessandro Castiglione
Alessandro Castiglione
RBRoberto Bovo
Roberto Bovo
Antonino VallesiAntonino Vallesi
Antonino Vallesi
CGCarlo Gabelli
Carlo Gabelli
Sensorineural systems play a crucial role in the diagnosis, treatment and management of several neurological disorders. The function of the eye and ear represents a unique window for testing various conditions in cognitive decline or dementia. Touch and smell have also been found to be strongly involved in neurodegenerative conditions, and their decline has been significantly associated with the progression of the disease; hence, the idea that restoring sensory function in cognitively impaired adults might enable a significant improvement in their cognitive status, reducing the worldwide incidence and prevalence of dementia. Not all sensorineural ‘windows' can benefit equally from the same procedures; however, hearing and vision can certainly gain the most from dependable therapeutic and other diagnostic options. The ear, including the vestibular system, deserves an honored place among the sensory organs in this context due mainly to the sophisticated electrical devices available that have amply demonstrated their effectiveness in treating hearing loss. Restoring an individual's hearing can reduce the cognitive ‘load', i.e. the neural activity needed to understand/recognize the spoken word - an activity that becomes more demanding if the brain is obliged to recruit different neural populations to achieve the same performance, as happens in older adults with sensory impairments. The sensory interfaces may also facilitate the early diagnosis of conditions characterized by a lengthy preclinical phase, as well as enabling noninvasive, follow-up procedures to assess the outcome of rehabilitation measures and distinguish physiological brain aging from neurodegenerative disorders. The present study is a brief literature review on the issues and prospects relating to the unique relationship between hearing and cognitive decline, with a general introduction to the main topics before focusing on rehabilitation training with hearing aids and cochlear implants to combat cognitive decline.

1 November 2011 in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andrea CiorbaAndrea Ciorba
Andrea Ciorba
RBR. Bovo
R. Bovo
PTP. Trevisi
P. Trevisi
MRM. Rosignoli
M. Rosignoli
CAC. Aimoni
C. Aimoni
Alessandro MartiniAlessandro Martini
Alessandro Martini

1 June 2013 in International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlice Benatti
Alice Benatti
ACAlessandro Castiglione
Alessandro Castiglione
PTPatrizia Trevisi
Patrizia Trevisi
RBRoberto Bovo
Roberto Bovo
MRMonica Rosignoli
Monica Rosignoli
Alessandro MartiniAlessandro Martini
Alessandro Martini

10 December 2010 in Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRoberto Bovo
Roberto Bovo
Andrea CiorbaAndrea Ciorba
Andrea Ciorba
PTPatrizia Trevisi
Patrizia Trevisi
CAClaudia Aimoni
Claudia Aimoni
LCLucia Cappiello
Lucia Cappiello
Alessandro MartiniAlessandro Martini
Alessandro Martini
Conclusions: Despite the need for special fitting strategies, improvements in speech discrimination tests support the use of cochlear implantation (CI) for patients with Cogan syndrome. Adequate preimplant counselling is mandatory, to prevent high expectations and to stress the necessity for bilateral implantation. Objective: In 60% of patients with Cogan syndrome, CI remains the only treatment option. Literature data agree that once the electrode array is properly inserted, functional outcomes are very good. Nevertheless, results may deteriorate due to progressive cochlear ossification. A few studies have documented the outcomes of CI in these patients, but none have reported the long-term results. Methods: This was a retrospective study describing the outcomes of 3 implanted patients with Cogan syndrome – among 300 adult patients who received a cochlear implant, 3 had become deaf due to Cogan syndrome. Results: In one patient the cochlear ossification advanced and the speech perception abilities worsened from the highest category to identification of words in closed set. The second patient complained of an abrupt reduction of loudness at 18 months post-implant, which required an increased electrical stimulation. The third patient reached the identification category probably due to auditory dyssynchrony, as an atypical consequence of the syndrome.