and Izak Faiena

and Izak Faiena


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 September 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMiyad Movassaghi
Miyad Movassaghi
RCRainjade Chung
Rainjade Chung
CAChristopher B. Anderson
Christopher B. Anderson
MSMark Stein
Mark Stein
YSYvonne M. Saenger
Yvonne M. Saenger
AFand Izak Faiena
and Izak Faiena
The use of immunotherapy has become a critical treatment modality in many advanced cancers. However, immunotherapy in prostate cancer has not been met with similar success. Multiple interrelated mechanisms, such as low tumor mutational burden, immunosuppressive cells, and impaired cellular immunity, appear to subvert the immune system, creating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and leading to lower treatment efficacy in advanced prostate cancer. The lethality of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer is driven by the lack of therapeutic regimens capable of generating durable responses. Multiple strategies are currently being tested to overcome immune resistance including combining various classes of treatment modalities. Several completed and ongoing trials have shown that combining vaccines or checkpoint inhibitors with hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, antibody–drug conjugates, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, or chemotherapy may enhance immune responses and induce long-lasting clinical responses without significant toxicity. Here, we review the current state of immunotherapy for prostate cancer, as well as tumor-specific mechanisms underlying therapeutic resistance, with a comprehensive look at the current preclinical and clinical immunotherapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and impaired cellular immunity that have largely limited the utility of immunotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.

18 May 2023 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRainjade Chung
Rainjade Chung
GMGeorge W. Moran
George W. Moran
MMMiyad Movassaghi
Miyad Movassaghi
DPDaniel Pohl
Daniel Pohl
JIJustin Ingram
Justin Ingram
AFand Izak Faiena
and Izak Faiena

22 August 2024 in Journal of Immunotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFand Izak Faiena
and Izak Faiena
SASabina Adhikary
Sabina Adhikary
CSColleen Schweitzer
Colleen Schweitzer
SAStephanie H. Astrow
Stephanie H. Astrow
TGTristan Grogan
Tristan Grogan
ADAlexandra Drakaki
Alexandra Drakaki
Melanoma-associated antigen-A (MAGE-A) is expressed in multiple cancers with restricted expression in normal tissue. We sought to assess the MAGE-A3/A6 expression profile as well as immune landscape in urothelial (UC) and non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). We also assessed co-expression of immune-associated markers, including programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor and/or immune cells, and assessed the effect of checkpoint inhibitor treatment on these markers in the context of urothelial carcinoma. We used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections from a variety of tumor types were screened by IHC for MAGE-A and PD-L1 expression. Gene expression analyses by RNA sequencing were performed on RNA extracted from serial tissue sections. UC tumor samples from patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors were assessed by IHC and NanoString gene expression analysis for MAGE-A and immune marker expression before and after treatment. Overall, 84 samples (57%) had any detectable MAGE-A expression. Detectable MAGE-A expression was present at similar frequencies in both tumor tissue types, with 41 (50%) NSCLC and 43 (64%) UC. MAGE-A expression was not significantly changed before and after checkpoint inhibitor therapy by both IHC and NanoString mRNA sequencing. Other immune markers were similarly unchanged post immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Stable expression of MAGE-A3/A6 pre and post checkpoint inhibitor treatment indicates that archival specimens harvested after checkpoint therapy are applicable to screening potential candidates for MAGE therapies.