Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis

Dr. Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2010 in Tissue Engineering Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDaniel E. Kehoe
Daniel E. Kehoe
DJDonghui Jing
Donghui Jing
LLLye T. Lock
Lye T. Lock
ETEmmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Advances in stem cell biology have afforded promising results for the generation of various cell types for therapies against devastating diseases. However, a prerequisite for realizing the therapeutic potential of stem cells is the development of bioprocesses for the production of stem cell progeny in quantities that satisfy clinical demands. Recent reports on the expansion and directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in scalable stirred-suspension bioreactors (SSBs) demonstrated that large-scale production of therapeutically useful hESC progeny is feasible with current state-of-the-art culture technologies. Stem cells have been cultured in SSBs as aggregates, in microcarrier suspension and after encapsulation. The various modes in which SSBs can be employed for the cultivation of hESCs and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are described. To that end, this is the first account of hiPSC cultivation in a microcarrier stirred-suspension system. Given that cultured stem cells and their differentiated progeny are the actual products used in tissue engineering and cell therapies, the impact of bioreactor's operating conditions on stem cell self-renewal and commitment should be considered. The effects of variables specific to SSB operation on stem cell physiology are discussed. Finally, major challenges are presented which remain to be addressed before the mainstream use of SSBs for the large-scale culture of hESCs and hiPSCs.

1 August 2009 in Tissue Engineering Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLye T. Lock
Lye T. Lock
ETEmmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) with their abilities for extensive proliferation and multi-lineage differentiation can serve as a renewable source of cellular material in regenerative medicine. However, the development of processes for large-scale generation of human ESCs (hESCs) or their progeny will be necessary before hESC-based therapies become a reality. We hypothesized that microcarrier stirred-suspension bioreactors characterized by scalability, straightforward operation, and tight control of the culture environment can be used for hESC culture and directed differentiation. Under appropriate conditions, the concentration of hESCs cultured in a microcarrier bioreactor increased 34- to 45-fold over 8 days. The cells retained the expression of pluripotency markers such as OCT3/4A, NANOG, and SSEA4, as assessed by quantitative PCR, immunocytochemistry, and flow cytometry. We further hypothesized that hESCs on microcarriers can be induced to definitive endoderm (DE) when incubated with physiologically relevant factors. In contrast to embryoid body cultures, all hESCs on microcarriers are exposed to soluble stimuli in the bulk medium facilitating efficient transition to DE. After reaching a peak concentration, hESCs in microcarrier cultures were incubated in medium containing activin A, Wnt3a, and low concentration of serum. More than 80% of differentiated hESCs coexpressed FOXA2 and SOX17 in addition to other DE markers, whereas the expression of non-DE genes was either absent or minimal. We also demonstrate that the hESC-to-DE induction in microcarrier cultures is scalable. Our findings support the use of microcarrier bioreactors for the generation of endoderm progeny from hESCs including pancreatic islets and liver cells in therapeutically useful quantities.

25 June 2020 in Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GNGopika G. Nair
Gopika G. Nair
ETEmmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
MHMatthias Hebrok
Matthias Hebrok

22 October 2019 in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZCZijing Chen
Zijing Chen
SDShawna Downing
Shawna Downing
ETEmmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Regenerating islet-derived (Reg) proteins have emerged as multifunctional agents with pro-proliferative, anti-apoptotic, differentiation-inducing and bactericidal properties. Over the last forty years since first discovered, Reg proteins have been implicated in a gamut of maladies including diabetes, various types of cancer of the digestive tract, and Alzheimer disease. Surprisingly though, a consensus is still absent on the regulation of their expression, and molecular underpinning of their function. Here, we provide a critical appraisal of recent findings in the field of Reg protein biology. Specifically, the structural characteristics are reviewed particularly in connection with established or purported functions of different members of the Reg family. Moreover, Reg expression patterns in different tissues both under normal and pathophysiological conditions are summarized. Putative receptors and cascades reported to relay Reg signaling inciting cellular responses are presented aiming at a better appreciation of the biological activities of the distinct Reg moieties. Challenges are also discussed that have hampered thus far the rapid progress in this field such as the use of non-standard nomenclature for Reg molecules among various research groups, the existence of multiple Reg members with significant degree of homology and possibly compensatory modes of action, and the need for common assays with robust readouts of Reg activity. Coordinated research is warranted going forward, given that several research groups have independently linked Reg proteins to diseased states and raised the possibility that these biomolecules can serve as therapeutic targets and biomarkers.

1 December 2013 in Heart Rhythm
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGlenna C.L. Bett
Glenna C.L. Bett
AKAaron D. Kaplan
Aaron D. Kaplan
ALAgnieszka Lis
Agnieszka Lis
TCThomas R. Cimato
Thomas R. Cimato
ETEmmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
RRRandall L. Rasmusson
Randall L. Rasmusson

13 February 2001 in Cell Motility
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ETEmmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
Emmanuel S. S. Tzanakakis
LHLinda K. Hansen
Linda K. Hansen
WHWei-Shou Hu
Wei-Shou Hu