Sadakatsu Ikeda

Prof. Sadakatsu Ikeda


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in JAMA Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSherri Z. Millis
Sherri Z. Millis
SISadakatsu Ikeda
Sadakatsu Ikeda
SRSandeep Reddy
Sandeep Reddy
ZGZoran Gatalica
Zoran Gatalica
RKRazelle Kurzrock
Razelle Kurzrock
The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is one of the most commonly activated signals in diverse cancer types.1 This pathway controls cell proliferation, growth, differentiation, protein synthesis, glucose metabolism, migration, and apoptosis.1 Activation of this pathway is initiated by the binding of corresponding ligands to tyrosine kinase receptors.1 A regulatory subunit of PI3K is phosphorylated and results in the activation of p110, a catalytic subunit of PI3K.2 The activation of PI3K leads to production of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate, a lipid second messenger, and further activation of downstream effectors such as protein kinase B (AKT) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).3 Phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) dephosphorylates proteins in this pathway.3

30 April 2018 in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SISadakatsu Ikeda
Sadakatsu Ikeda
JLJordan S. Lim
Jordan S. Lim
RKRazelle Kurzrock
Razelle Kurzrock
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has limited treatment options. Molecular analysis of its mutational landscape may enable the identification of novel therapies. However, biopsy is not routinely performed in HCC. The utility of analyzing cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is not established. We performed 32 ctDNA NGS analyses on 26 patients; 10 of these patients had tissue NGS (236 to 626 genes). ctDNA was evaluated using an assay that detects single nucleotide variants, amplifications, fusions, and specific insertion/deletion alterations in 54 to 70 genes. The ctDNA demonstrated that 23 of 26 patients (88.5%) had ≥1 characterized alteration, and all these individuals had ≥1 potentially actionable alteration. The most frequently mutated gene was TP53 (16 of 26 patients, 61.5%). There were 47 unique characterized molecular alterations among 18 total gene alterations [variants of unknown significance (VUS) excluded)]. ctDNA and tissue NGS frequently showed different profiles, perhaps due to length of time between tissue and blood samples [median = 370 days (range, 29 to 876 days)]. Serial ctDNA evaluation in an illustrative patient treated with capecitabine demonstrated emergence of a new TP53 alteration after progression. In conclusion, ctDNA profiling is feasible in advanced HCC, and serial assessment using ctDNA NGS can reveal genomic changes with time. NGS of ctDNA provides a minimally invasive alternative for identifying potentially actionable gene alterations and potential molecular targeted therapies. Dynamic changes in molecular portfolio associated with therapeutic pressure in difficult-to-biopsy patients can be observed. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 1114–22. ©2018 AACR.

31 March 2022 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YAYasuko Aoyagi
Yasuko Aoyagi
YKYoshihito Kano
Yoshihito Kano
KTKohki Tohyama
Kohki Tohyama
SMShotaro Matsudera
Shotaro Matsudera
YKYuichi Kumaki
Yuichi Kumaki
SISadakatsu Ikeda
Sadakatsu Ikeda
Introduction: Clinical sequencing has provided molecular and therapeutic insights into the field of clinical oncology. However, despite its significance, its clinical utility in Japanese patients remains unknown. Here, we examined the clinical utility of tissue-based clinical sequencing with FoundationOne® CDx and FoundationOne® Heme. Between August 2018 and August 2019, 130 Japanese pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors were tested with FoundationOne® CDx or FoundationOne® Heme. Results: The median age of 130 patients was 60.5 years (range: 3 to 84 years), and among them, 64 were males and 66 were females. Major cancer types were gastrointestinal cancer (23 cases) and hepatic, biliary, and pancreatic cancer (21 cases). A molecular tumor board had been completed on all 130 cases by October 31, 2019. The median number of gene alterations detected by Foundation testing, excluding variants of unknown significance (VUS) was 4 (ranged 0 to 21) per case. Of the 130 cases, one or more alterations were found in 123 cases (94.6%), and in 114 cases (87.7%), actionable alterations with candidates for therapeutic agents were found. In 29 (22.3%) of them, treatment corresponding to the gene alteration was performed. Regarding secondary findings, 13 cases (10%) had an alteration suspected of a hereditary tumor. Of the 13 cases, only one case received a definite diagnosis of hereditary tumor. Conclusions: Our study showed that clinical sequencing might be useful for detecting gene alterations in various cancer types and exploring treatment options. However, many issues still need to be improved.

4 June 2018 in Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SISadakatsu Ikeda
Sadakatsu Ikeda
MSMaria Schwaederle
Maria Schwaederle
MMMandakini Mohindra
Mandakini Mohindra
DJDenis Leonardo Fontes Jardim
Denis Leonardo Fontes Jardim
RKRazelle Kurzrock
Razelle Kurzrock
We analyzed clinical associations of MET alterations in the plasma of patients with diverse malignancies. Digital sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) (54–70 genes) was performed in 438 patients; 263 patients also had tissue sequencing (182–315 genes). The most represented tumor types were gastrointestinal (28.1%), brain (24.9%), and lung (23.2%). Most patients (71.2%) had recurrent/metastatic disease. MET alterations were observed in 31 patients (7.1%) and correlated with bone metastasis (P = 0.007), with TP53 (P = 0.001) and PTEN (P = 0.003) abnormalities, and with an increased number of alterations (median, 4 vs 1, P = 0.001) (all multivariable analyses). Patients with MET alterations demonstrated a significantly shorter median time to metastasis/recurrence (1.0 vs 10.4 months, P = 0.044, multivariable) and a poorer survival (30.6 vs 58.4 months, P = 0.013, univariate only). Of the 31 patients with MET alterations, 18 also had tissue testing; only two also had tissue MET alterations (11.1%); MET alterations were detected at a lower frequency in tissue (1.14%) compared to ctDNA (7.1%), with P = 0.0002. In conclusion, the detection of MET alterations by liquid biopsy is feasible. MET ctDNA alterations were associated with a poorer prognosis, higher numbers of genomic abnormalities, and bone metastases. The correlation with bone metastases may explain the higher frequency of MET alterations in blood ctDNA than in tissue (since bones are rarely biopsied) and the previous observations of bone-predominant responses to MET inhibitors. The high number of co-altered genes suggests that MET inhibitors may need to be combined with other agents to induce/optimize responses.

17 January 2023 in Cancer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HKHidenori Kage
Hidenori Kage
ASAya Shinozaki‐Ushiku
Aya Shinozaki‐Ushiku
KIKazunaga Ishigaki
Kazunaga Ishigaki
Yusuke SatoYusuke Sato
Yusuke Sato
MTMasahiko Tanabe
Masahiko Tanabe
Katsutoshi OdaKatsutoshi Oda
Katsutoshi Oda
Comprehensive cancer genome profiling (CGP) has been nationally reimbursed in Japan since June 2019. Less than 10% of the patients have been reported to undergo recommended treatment. Todai OncoPanel (TOP) is a dual DNA–RNA panel as well as a paired tumor–normal matched test. Two hundred patients underwent TOP as part of Advanced Medical Care B with approval from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare between September 2018 and December 2019. Tests were carried out in patients with cancers without standard treatment or when patients had already undergone standard treatment. Data from DNA and RNA panels were analyzed in 198 and 191 patients, respectively. The percentage of patients who were given therapeutic or diagnostic recommendations was 61% (120/198). One hundred and four samples (53%) harbored gene alterations that were detected with the DNA panel and had potential treatment implications, and 14 samples (7%) had a high tumor mutational burden. Twenty‐two samples (11.1%) harbored 30 fusion transcripts or MET exon 14 skipping that were detected by the RNA panel. Of those 30 transcripts, 6 had treatment implications and 4 had diagnostic implications. Thirteen patients (7%) were found to have pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants and genetic counseling was recommended. Overall, 12 patients (6%) received recommended treatment. In summary, patients benefited from both TOP DNA and RNA panels while following the same indication as the approved CGP tests. (UMIN000033647).

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPhilip Cohen
Philip Cohen
SKShumei Kato
Shumei Kato
AGAaron M. Goodman
Aaron M. Goodman
SISadakatsu Ikeda
Sadakatsu Ikeda
RKRazelle Kurzrock
Razelle Kurzrock
Metastatic basal cell carcinoma may be treated with hedgehog pathway inhibitors, including vismodegib and sonidegib. However, patients can demonstrate resistance to these agents. We describe a man with metastatic basal cell carcinoma who did not respond well to vismodegib and sonidegib. Next generation sequencing of his metastatic liver tumor demonstrated a high tumor mutational burden (103 mutations per megabase) and the genomic amplification of PD-L1, both of which are features that predict response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Treatment with nivolumab, an anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor, resulted in near complete remission. Yet, he developed new primary cutaneous basal cell carcinomas while receiving immunotherapy and while his metastatic disease showed an ongoing response. His new superficial skin cancer had a lower tumor mutational burden (45 mutations per megabase) than the metastatic disease. Since immunotherapy response rates are higher in patients with more genomically complex tumors, our observations suggest that, in contrast with the premise of earlier treatment is better, which holds true for targeted and cytotoxic therapies, immunotherapy may be better suited to more advanced disease.