Paweł J. Konopacki

Dr. Paweł J. Konopacki

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2003 in Postharvest Biology and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTL.M.M Tijskens
L.M.M Tijskens
PKPaweł J. Konopacki
Paweł J. Konopacki
MSM Simcic
M Simcic

1 November 2017 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRyszard Hołownicki
Ryszard Hołownicki
GDGrzegorz Doruchowsky
Grzegorz Doruchowsky
WŚWaldemar Świechowski
Waldemar Świechowski
AGArtur Godyń
Artur Godyń
PKPaweł J. Konopacki
Paweł J. Konopacki

1 November 2008 in Postharvest Biology and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTL.M.M. Tijskens
L.M.M. Tijskens
PKPaweł J. Konopacki
Paweł J. Konopacki
RSR.E. Schouten
R.E. Schouten
JHJ. Hribar
J. Hribar
MSM. Simčič
M. Simčič

7 September 2021 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRyszard Hołownicki
Ryszard Hołownicki
GDGrzegorz Doruchowsky
Grzegorz Doruchowsky
WŚWaldemar Świechowski
Waldemar Świechowski
PKPaweł J. Konopacki
Paweł J. Konopacki
AGArtur Godyń
Artur Godyń
Three non-ionic adjuvants, Agral, Silwet, and Greemax, at three concentrations, were applied on apple leaves with the use of hollow cone nozzles (TR) and air-induction nozzles (ID) to verify the assumption that adjuvants may improve spray coverage obtained by coarse droplets, and thereby ensure both satisfactory application quality and an environmental advantage. Spray coverage and droplet density were measured on both sides of the leaves. The adjuvants enhanced the spray coverage when applied at a certain concentration level. In general, the adjuvant coverage produced by the ID nozzles equaled the pure water coverage produced by the TR nozzles, thereby showing the adjuvants’ potential to compensate for the lower spray coverage usually obtained by coarse spray. A higher spray coverage was obtained on the lower side of leaves, which is discussed in terms of leaf surface properties. In the experiment with the mixture of Silwet and the fungicide Delan (dithianon), the product interacted with the adjuvant, resulting in the reversed picture of spray coverage and droplet density on the upper and lower leaf sides compared to the results obtained for the adjuvant alone. The combination of coarse spray nozzles with adjuvants may reduce environmental pollution without compromising the quality of spray applications in fruit growing.

3 February 2010 in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LTLmm Tijskens
Lmm Tijskens
RSRob E Schouten
Rob E Schouten
PKPaweł J. Konopacki
Paweł J. Konopacki
JHJanez Hribar
Janez Hribar
MSMarjan Simčič
Marjan Simčič

1 October 2012 in Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAugustyn Mika
Augustyn Mika
PWPaweł Wawrzyńzak
Paweł Wawrzyńzak
ZBZbigniew Buler
Zbigniew Buler
DKDorota Konopacka
Dorota Konopacka
PKPaweł J. Konopacki
Paweł J. Konopacki
BGBogdan Gotowicki
Bogdan Gotowicki
Eleven plum cultivars (Prunus domestica L.) for processing grafted on semidwarf rootstock ‘Wangenheim Prune’ and vigorous rootstock ‘Myrobalan’ were densely planted (1000, 1250, 1666, 2500 trees ha-1) and trained to central leader spindle tree. A new training system was applied to obtain trees suitable for mechanical harvesting. The leader was not headed after planting and summer training procedures were performed in May/June. From the third year onwards, renewal pruning was carried out after fruit harvesting. The new training and pruning systems resulted in very fast tree growth, abundant branching, fruit bud formation on young wood and early bearing. The plum trees appeared to be suitable for hand and mechanical harvesting within 3 years from planting. The self propelled straddle combine harvester was able to harvest 2-3 tons of plums per hour compared to 30 kg with hand picking. Harvesting effectiveness was 90-95%. The quality of mechanically harvested plums was a little worse than of those hand picked, but fruits were suitable for processing. The ‘Common Prune’ and the prune type small plums were the most suitable fruit for mechanical harvesting.