Retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) consistently challenges medical staff and patients, and the incidence of retear after surgery is 10-94%. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors that cause retear after ARCR and provide theoretical guidance for clinical intervention to reduce the occurrence of postoperative rotator cuff retear. Systematic review and meta-analysis. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021225088). PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for observational studies on risk factors for rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair. Meta-analytical methods were used to determine the odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) of potential risk factors related to postoperative rotator cuff retear. Stata 15.1 was used to quantitatively evaluate the publication bias of the statistical results. Fourteen studies from 6 countries with a total of 5693 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the risk factors for retear after rotator cuff repair were age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, subscapularis and infraspinatus fatty infiltration, symptom duration, bone mineral density, tear length, tear width, tear size area, amount of retraction, critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromiohumeral interval (AI), distance from the musculotendinous junction to the glenoid, operative duration, biceps procedure, and postoperative University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score. These findings can help clinical medical staff identify patients who are prone to retear early after arthroscopic repair and develop targeted prevention and treatment strategies for modifiable risk factors, which are of great significance for reducing the occurrence of rotator cuff retear after ARCR.

Background: Studies have shown that the combined application of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can repair degenerated cartilage and delay the progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of the intra-articular injection of PRP combined with HA compared with the intra-articular injection of PRP or HA alone in the treatment of KOA.Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched from inception to December 2019. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies of PRP combined with HA for KOA were included. Two orthopaedic surgeons conducted the literature retrieval and extracted the data. Outcome indicators included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the Lequesne Index, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and adverse events (AEs). Review Manager 5.3 was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) of the pooled data. STATA 14.0 was used for quantitative publication bias evaluation.Results: Seven studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 2 cohort studies) with a total of 941 patients were included. In the VAS comparison after 6 months of follow-up, PRP combined with HA was more likely to reduce knee pain than PRP alone (SMD: − 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): − 0.55 to − 0.06;P = 0.01 < 0.05). PRP combined with HA for KOA achieved better improvements in the WOMAC Function Score (SMD: -0.32; 95% CI: − 0.54 to − 0.10;P < 0.05) and WOMAC Total Score (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: − 0.67 to − 0.17;P < 0.05) at the 12-month follow-up than did the application of PRP alone. In a comparison of Lequesne Index scores at the 6-month follow-up, PRP combined with HA improved knee pain scores more than PRP alone (SMD: -0.42; 95% CI: − 0.67 to − 0.17;P < 0.05). In terms of AEs, PRP combined with HA was not significantly different from PRP or HA alone (P > 0.05).Conclusions: Compared with intra-articular injection of PRP alone, that of PRP combined with HA can improve the WOMAC Function Scores, WOMAC Total Score, 6-month follow-up VAS ratings, and Lequesne Index scores. However, in terms of the incidence of AEs, PRP combined with HA is not significantly different from PRP or HA alone.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease that affects the axial skeleton. In this study, we systematically reviewed Chinese AS epidemiological studies from the past 15 years to elucidate its prevalence and provide scientific data for China’s health care system. AS epidemiological research in China was summarized by conducting a literature review. A review and statistical analysis of the literature on the epidemiology of AS in mainland China published from May 2005 to May 2019 were performed via a meta-analysis. We calculated the prevalence of AS and analysed differences by sex, region, and population source using STATA12.0 software. Eleven papers including 122,558 subjects from mainland China were included. Over the past 15 years, the total prevalence of AS in mainland China was 0.29% (95% CI 0.22–0.35%), ranging from 0.42% (95% CI 0.31–0.52%) in males to 0.15% (95% CI 0.13–0.18%) in females; the difference in the prevalence of AS by sex was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The prevalence of AS in both southern and northern China was 0.31% (95% CI 0.21–0.42% and 0.21–0.40%, respectively), with no significant difference noted (P = 0.816 > 0.005). The prevalence of AS in Chinese military populations was 0.27% (95% CI 0.09–0.45%), and in community populations, it was 0.29% (95% CI 0.23–0.35%). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of AS by sampling resource (P = 0.115 > 0.005). The prevalence of AS in China was 0.29% and continues to increase. Sex differences in its prevalence were identified; the prevalence rate was 2.8 times higher in males than in females. Epidemiologists in China should formulate precise scientific investigations to provide additional authoritative epidemiological data for the prevention and treatment of AS.

Objectives The primary aim was to evaluate risk factors for surgical site infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The secondary aim was to investigate the surgical site infection incidence rate and the mean time to postoperative surgical site infection symptoms. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched from database inception to September 2021 and updated in April 2022. Eligibility criteria Quantitative, original studies reporting potential risk factors for surgical site infections after ACLR were included. Results Twenty-three studies with 3871 infection events from 469 441 ACLRs met the inclusion criteria. Male sex (OR 1.78, p< 0.00001), obesity (OR 1.82, p=0.0005), tobacco use (OR 1.37, p=0.01), diabetes mellitus (OR 3.40, p=0.002), steroid use history (OR 4.80, p<0.00001), previous knee surgery history (OR 3.63, p=0.02), professional athlete (OR 4.56, p=0.02), revision surgery (OR 2.05, p=0.04), hamstring autografts (OR 2.83, p<0.00001), concomitant lateral extra-articular tenodesis (OR 3.92, p=0.0001) and a long operating time (weighted mean difference 8.12, p=0.005) were identified as factors that increased the risk of surgical site infections (superficial and deep) after ACLR. Age, outpatient or inpatient surgery, bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts or allografts and a concomitant meniscus suture did not increase the risk of surgical site infections. The incidence of surgical site infections after ACLR was approximately 1% (95% CI 0.7% to 1.2%). The mean time from surgery to the onset of surgical site infection symptoms was approximately 17.1 days (95% CI 13.2 to 21.0 days). Conclusion Male sex, obesity, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, steroid use history, previous knee surgery history, professional athletes, revision surgery, hamstring autografts, concomitant lateral extra-articular tenodesis and a long operation time may increase the risk of surgical site infections after ACLR. Although the risk of surgical site infections after ACLR is low, raising awareness and implementing effective preventions for risk factors are priorities for clinicians to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections due to its seriousness.

Curcumin, a polyphenolic compound extracted from turmeric (Curcuma longa L.), is widely used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and experimental studies show that curcuminoid formulations have considerable clinical application value in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of curcumin, both alone and in combination with other drugs, in KOA treatment through a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials of curcumin for KOA treatment. The time range of the search was from the establishment of each database to April 26, 2023. The NMAs of outcome indicators were all performed using a random-effects model. NMAs were calculated and graphed in R using MetaInsight and Stata 140 software. Measurement data were represented by the mean difference (MD), while count data were represented by the odds ratio (OR); the 95% confidence interval (CI) of each effect size was also calculated. This study included 23 studies from 7 countries, including 2175 KOA patients and 6 interventions. The NMA results showed that compared with placebo, curcumin significantly reduced the visual analogue scale pain score (MD = -1.63, 95% CI: -2.91 to -0.45) and total WOMAC score (MD = -18.85, 95% CI: -29.53 to -8.76). Compared with placebo, curcumin (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.36), curcumin + NSAIDs (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.13) and NSAIDs (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.47) reduced the use of rescue medication. Compared with NSAIDs, curcumin (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.94) and curcumin + NSAIDs (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.9) had a reduced incidence of adverse reactions. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve results indicated that curcumin monotherapy, curcumin + chondroprotective agents, and curcumin + NSAIDs have good clinical value in KOA treatment. Curcumin, either alone or in combination with other treatments, is considered to have good clinical efficacy and safety in KOA treatment. Drug combinations containing curcumin may have the dual effect of enhancing efficacy and reducing adverse reactions, but this possibility still needs to be confirmed by further clinical and basic research.

Purpose: To explore the molecular mechanism of luteolin in the treatment of osteoporosis (OP) by network pharmacological prediction and experimentation.Methods: The target proteins of luteolin were obtained with the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP). OP-related proteins were extracted from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) and GeneCards and DisGeNET databases. We imported the common protein targets of luteolin and OP into the STRING database to obtain the relationships between the targets. The common target proteins of luteolin and OP were assessed by KEGG and GO enrichment analyses with the DAVID database. Animal experiments were conducted to verify the effect of luteolin on bone mineral density in ovariectomised (OVX) rats. Finally, the effects of luteolin on key signalling pathways were verified by cell experiments in vitro.Results: Forty-four targets of luteolin involved in the treatment of OP, including key target proteins such as TP53, AKT1, HSP90AA1, JUN, RELA, CASP3, and MAPK1, were screened. KEGG enrichment analysis found that luteolin inhibits OP by regulating the PI3K-Akt, TNF, oestrogen and p53 signalling pathways. The results of animal experiments showed that bone mass in the low-dose luteolin group (Luteolin-L group, 10 mg/kg), high-dose luteolin group (Luteolin-H group, 50 mg/kg) and positive drug group was significantly higher than that in the OVX group (P<0.05). Western blot (WB) analysis showed that the protein expression levels of Collagen I, Osteopontin and RUNX2 in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) cultured with 0.5, 1 and 5 μM luteolin for 48 h were significantly higher than those in the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) group (P<0.05). In vitro cell experiments showed that the p-PI3K/PI3K and p-Akt/Akt expression ratios in BMSCs cultured with 0.5, 1 and 5 μM luteolin for 48 h were also significantly higher than those in the DMSO group (P<0.05).Conclusions: Luteolin has multitarget and multichannel effects in the treatment of OP. Luteolin could reduce bone loss in OVX rats, which may be due to its ability to promote the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by regulating the activity of the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway.