Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) therapy have an increased risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia, which are known relevant factors in disease prognosis and therapeutic success, but still lack adequate screening in clinical routine. We evaluated the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for suitability in assessing cognitive performance in HD patients in comparison to the commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a detailed neuropsychological test battery, used as gold standard. 43 HD patients and 42 healthy controls with an average age of 58 years, were assessed with the MoCA, the MMSE and a detailed neuropsychological test battery, covering the domains of memory, attention, language, visuospatial and executive functions. Composite scores were created for comparison of cognitive domains and test results were analyzed using Spearman's correlation and linear regression. Cognitive dysfunction was defined using z-score values and predictive values were calculated. Sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. HD patients performed worse in all cognitive domains, especially in memory recall and executive functions. The MoCA correlated well with the detailed test battery and identified patients with cognitive impairment with a sensitivity of 76.7% and specificity of 78.6% for a cut-off value of ≤24 out of 30 points. In the detailed assessment executive functions accounted significantly for performance in the MoCA. The MMSE only discriminated weakly between groups. The MoCA represents a suitable cognitive screening tool for hemodialysis patients, demonstrating good sensitivity and specificity levels, and covering executive functions, which appear to play an important role in cognitive performance of HD patients.

Spinocerebellar ataxias are dominantly inherited disorders that are associated with progressive brain degeneration, mainly affecting the cerebellum and brainstem. As part of the multicentre European integrated project on spinocerebellar ataxias study, 37 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia-1, 19 with spinocerebellar ataxia-3 and seven with spinocerebellar ataxia-6 were clinically examined and underwent magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and after a 2-year follow-up. All patients were compared with age-matched and gender-matched healthy control subjects. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis included three-dimensional volumetry and observer-independent longitudinal voxel-based morphometry. Volumetry revealed loss of brainstem, cerebellar and basal ganglia volume in all genotypes. Most sensitive to change was the pontine volume in spinocerebellar ataxia-1, striatal volume in spinocerebellar ataxia-3 and caudate volume in spinocerebellar ataxia-6. Sensitivity to change, as measured by standard response mean, of the respective MRI measures was greater than that of the most sensitive clinical measure, the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. Longitudinal voxel-based morphometry revealed greatest grey matter loss in the cerebellum and brainstem in spinocerebellar ataxia-1, in the putamen and pallidum in spinocerebellar ataxia-3 and in the cerebellum, thalamus, putamen and pallidum in spinocerebellar ataxia-6. There was a mild correlation between CAG repeat length and volume loss of the bilateral cerebellum and the pons in spinocerebellar ataxia-1. Quantitative volumetry and voxel-based morphometry imaging demonstrated genotype-specific patterns of atrophy progression in spinocerebellar ataxias-1, 3 and 6, and they showed a high sensitivity to detect change that was superior to clinical scales. These structural magnetic resonance imaging findings have the potential to serve as surrogate markers, which might help to delineate quantifiable endpoints and non-invasive methods for rapid and reliable data acquisition, encouraging their use in clinical trials.

Objectives: We aimed to objectify and compare persisting self‐reported symptoms in initially hospitalized and non‐hospitalized patients after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) by applying clinical standardized measures.Methods: We conducted a cross‐sectional study of adult patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection including medical history, neurological examination, blood markers, neuropsychological testing, patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Results: Fifty patients with persisting symptoms for at least 4 weeks were included and classified by initial hospitalization status. Median time from SARS‐CoV‐2 detection to investigation was 29.3 weeks (range 3.3–57.9). Although individual cognitive performance was generally within the normative range in both groups, mostly mild deficits were found in attention, executive functions, and memory. Hospitalized patients performed worse in global cognition, logical reasoning, and processes of verbal memory. In both groups, fatigue severity was associated with reduced performance in attention and psychomotor speed tasks (r_s = −0.40, p < 0.05) and reduced quality of life (EQ5D, r_s = 0.57, p < 0.001) and with more persisting symptoms (median 3 vs. 6, p < 0.01). PROMs identified fatigue, reduced sleep quality, and increased anxiety and depression in both groups but more pronounced in non‐hospitalized patients. Brain MRI revealed microbleeds exclusively in hospitalized patients (n = 5).Interpretation: Regardless of initial COVID‐19 severity, an individuals' mental and physical health can be severely impaired in the long‐term limitedly objectified by clinical standard diagnostic with abnormalities primarily found in hospitalized patients. This needs to be considered when planning rehabilitation therapies and should give rise to new biomarker research.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has gained recognition for its validity in detecting cognitive impairment in several clinical populations. For serial assessments, alternate forms are needed to overcome possible practice effects. Our objective was to investigate the reliability of two German MoCA alternate forms for longitudinal assessment applications. The original and one of two alternate forms of the MoCA were administered within a 60-min interval of a clinical interview in a counterbalanced order to 100 healthy elderly controls, 30 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 30 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The diagnosis of the majority of patients was supported by in vivo AD pathology biomarkers. There was a strong correlation between the alternate forms and the original MoCA in all groups, but particularly in the clinical samples. Total mean scores did not differ significantly between the MoCA versions, even taking into account the presentation order. As in previous studies, age and education influenced performance in the MoCA. The same pattern of group differences (controls > MCI > AD) was observed for each of the versions. All three forms can be reliably and interchangeably used in serial cognitive assessment, confirming the MoCA's applicability in research and clinical longitudinal approaches.